Email this article The change in the level of responsibility in the rehabilitation process of persons suffering from drug addiction
- Authors: Serezhko T.A.1, Volobueva N.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law
- Issue: Vol 16, No 2 (2019)
- Pages: 164-177
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1991-8569/article/view/52414
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2019.2.13
- ID: 52414
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study is devoted to the study of changes in the level of responsibility in the process of rehabilitation of people suffering from drug addiction. As research methods used: bibliographic review of foreign and domestic psychological literature, testing, quantitative and qualitative analysis of empirical data. The study was conducted in three stages, which were based on the allocation of the system of organizational and methodological tools and research principles.At the first stage, it was found that drug addicts who are beginning rehabilitation have low rates of responsibility. This is especially true in such areas of life as: the scope of failures in activities, the sphere of family relations, the sphere of interpersonal relations, health, which is primarily due to a lack of understanding of the meaning of responsibility and its role in human life and their own. Drug addicts can not cope with the negative emotions that arise at a time when the activity or situation is quite complex.At the second stage, the author monitored the course of the rehabilitation process and participated in its psychological support. Individual consultations, psychological trainings and group psychotherapy were included in a single process of rehabilitation of drug addicts, which we observed and analyzed for six months.At the third stage, respondents were examined after rehabilitation and found that they have acquired the ability to self-reliance and responsible performance of tasks and assignments.Comparison of the results of the study of responsibility before and after rehabilitation shows that in the process of rehabilitation there are changes in the responsibility of drug addicts. It is revealed that after rehabilitation the respondents significantly changed (increased) indicators of responsibility, which has a positive impact on the formation of attitudes to health in the context of dependent behavior.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Tatiana A. Serezhko
Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law
Email: serezhko@mail.ru
Cand. Phil. Sci., Associate Professor of Humanities, Social and Legal Disciplines Department 116, Sadovaya str., Belgorod, Russia, 308023
Natalia M. Volobueva
Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law
Email: nataliavolobueva@yandex.ru
Cand. Psych. Sci., Associate Professor of Humanities, Social and Legal Disciplines Department, psychologist of the rehabilitation center of the Foundation for the formation of a healthy lifestyle "In the name of the Archangel Gabriel" 116, Sadovaya str., Belgorod, Russia, 308023
References
- Брюн Е.А., Духанина И.В., Москвичёв В.Г. Реабилитационно-профилактические технологии наркологической помощи // Здравоохранение Российской Федерации. - 2007. - № 4. - С. 16-19.
- Быков С.В. Проблемы психологии ответственности личности: Монография / Под ред. д-ра психол. наук, проф. Г.В. Акопова. - Тольятти: ВУиТ, 2004. - 213 с.
- Волобуева Н.М., Сережко Т.А. Жизнестойкость и религиозность как ресурсы современного человека в трудных жизненных ситуациях // Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки. Филология. Журналистика. Педагогика. Психология. - 2015. - № 24 (221), вып. 28. - С. 151-158.
- Дементий Л.И. Ответственность: типология и личностные основания: Монография. - Омск: ОмГУ, 2001. - 192 с.
- Иваненко Я.В., Сережко Т.А. Физическая культура и спорт в системе ценностных ориентаций молодежи // Управление городом: теория и практика. - Март 2018. - № 1 (28). - С. 95-100.
- Муздыбаев К. Психология ответственности. - М.: Либроком, 2010. - 248 с.
- Преядин В.П. Ответственность как системное качество личности: Учеб. пособие.- Екатеринбург, 2001. - 209 с.
- Сатонина Н.Н. Социально-психологические аспекты различных видов ответственности в профессиональном поведении // Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Сер. Психология. - 2005. - № 1. - С. 47-54.
- Сережко Т.А. Философия воспитания здорового образа жизни в образовательном пространстве // Педагогическое образование в системе высшей школы: Мат-лы Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. «Педагогическое образование в системе высшей школы» и Междунар метод. конф. «Особенности методических подходов в образовательном процессе высшей школы». 1 апреля 2015 г. - Белгород: Изд-во БУКЭП, 2015. - С. 139-147.
- Старшенбаум Г.В. Аддиктология. Психология и психотерапия зависимостей. - М., 2006. - 280 с.
- Шевцова Ю.Б. О подходах к профилактике распространения наркомании // Наркология. - 2010. - № 5. - С. 50-58.
- Bell J., Reed К.D., Ashcroft R., Witton J., Strang J. Addiction Neuroethics // The ethics of addiction neuroscience research and treatment 2012, Pages 57-74.
- Brickman P., Rabinowitz V.C., Karuza J.Jr., Coates D., Cohn E., & Kidder L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368-384.
- Dawson & Archer. Addiction 1993; 88: 1509-1518.
- Gunzerath L., Hewitt B.G., Li T.K., Warren K.R. Alcohol research: past, present, and future. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011; 1216: 1-23.
- Leshner A.I. (1997) Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science, 278: 45-47.
- Robins L.N., Helzer J.E., Hesselbrock M., & Wish E. (2010). Vietnam Veterans Three Years after Vietnam: How Our Study Changed Our View of Heroin. The American Journal on Addiction, 19(3), 203-211.
- Rotter J.B. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New York, 1954. - 466 p.
- Schukit. Ch. 98. In: Davis et al. (eds). Neuropsychopharmacology: The Fith Generation of Progress. 2002.
- Volkow N.D., Li T.K. (2005) Drugs and alcohol: treating and preventing abuse, addiction and their medical consequences. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 108: 3-17.
Supplementary files
