HUMAN BEING AS PROJECTION OF SPACIAL AND TEMPORARY CONNECTIONS: PROJECTIONS AND CHALLENGES OF SOCIAL-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION
- Authors: Nesterenko V.M.1, Ionesov V.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 10, No 2 (2013)
- Pages: 142-148
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1991-8569/article/view/51935
- ID: 51935
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The human being is involved to social interaction to try is realizing two ways of communication – in space and time as positions here and now. The process of identification and self-consciousness of person is determined mainly in this double-sector communicative model. As a result, each individual performs a kind of projection of the spaсial and temporary relations in the communicative system of culture. Cultural communication is a complicated and dramatic process of development of humanity. The authors see two vectors of human identification in this process – individualization and generalization. It is shown the effective means of new structuring of historical experiences and innovative practices are new technologies and multifunctional systems in the form of multimedia, multiplications, multiplex and other multi- communications. The new technologies not only allow us to solve effectively the urgent tasks on social transformation, but also they throw a challenge to contemporary society by means of the cultivating of digital consciousness, virtual values and new imitative environment.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Vladimir M. Nesterenko
Samara State Technical University
Email: nesterenko.fgo@gmail.com
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head, department of Psychology and Pedagogics. 244, Molodogvardeiskaya st., Samara, 443100
Vladimir I. Ionesov
Samara State Technical University
Email: ionesov@mail.ru
Doctor of Cultural Studies, Associate Professor, department of Psychology and Pedagogics. 244, Molodogvardeiskaya st., Samara, 443100
References
- Белкин А.И., Ионесов В.И. Особенности психо-культурного опосредования ментальности авторов граффити и процесса мультикультурной интеграции //Известия Самарского научного центра РАН. –2011. – Т. 13. – №2 (6). – С. 1494 – 1501.
- Жирар Р. Насилие и священное. – М.: Новое культурное обозрение, 2000. –400 с.
- Ионесов В.И.Всемирное наследие в дискурсе культурно-антропологического знания // Наследие и гуманизм: культурная антропология на службе человечества: Материалымеждунар. науч. конф. (29 ноября 2009, Самара). – Самара: СГАКИ, 2010. – С. 58 – 87.
- Ионесов В.И. Мультикультурализм как интеграционный процесс: модели трансформации //Креативная экономика и социальные инновации: Междунар. науч. информ.-аналит. эл. журнал.– 2011. – № 1 (1). – С. 60 – 65.www.cesi-journal.com (дата обращения: 30/09/2013).