Features of pragmatic competence development while teaching a foreign language to university students

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The key objective of the conducted research is to develop methodology of building pragmatic competence while teaching English language to students of Saint Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University (SPCPU). In order to use a language fluently, learners have to study not only forms and meanings in it. Practical experience indicates that the development of pragmatic competence is one of the main aims of teaching a second language. However, only few English course books include this component. The research concentrates on the formation and enhancement of pragmatic competence which includes not only knowledge of the language but also cultural knowledge. Various methods to boost pragmatic competence are given. The results of research with an experimental design revealed that a deliberate focus on pragmatics during English classes was conducive to enhancement of pragmatic competence.

About the authors

Nadezhda G. Pirogova

St. Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: pirogova.nadezhda@pharminnotech.com

Cand. Ped. Sci., Associate Professor of Scientific and Educational Center of Foreign Languages and Intercultural Communication

Russian Federation, 14, Prof. Popova st., St. Petersburg, 197376

Grigoriy A. Rozhkov

St. Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University

Email: grigory.rozhkov@pharminnotech.com

Cand. Ped. Sci., Associate Professor, Director of Scientific and Educational Center of Foreign Languages and Intercultural Communication

Russian Federation, 14, Prof. Popova st., St. Petersburg, 197376

References

  1. Crystal D. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985. 277 p.
  2. Bardovi-Harlig K., Mahan-Taylor R. Introduction to teaching pragmatics. English Teaching Forum. 2002. Vol. 41. No. 3. Pp. 37–39.
  3. Canale M., Swain M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching an testing. Applied Linguistics. 1980. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 11–47.
  4. Canale M. From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. Language and Communication. London: Longman, 1983. 26 p.
  5. Kasper G., Rose K. Pragmatic development in a Second language. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2002. 364 p.
  6. Ishihara N., Cohen A. Teaching and learning pragmatics. Where language and culture meet. Great Britain: Longman Applied Linguistics, 2010. 384 p.
  7. Felix-Brasdefer J.C., Cohen A.D. Teaching pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: Grammar as a communicative resource. Hispania. 2012. Vol. 95. No. 4. Pp. 650–669.
  8. Thomas J. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics. 1983. Vol. 4. Pp. 91–112.
  9. Savignon S.J. Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1983. 322 p.
  10. Edwards M., Csizer K. Developing pragmatic competence in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum. 2004. Vol. 42. No. 3. Pp. 35–41.
  11. Martinez-Flor A., Uso-Juan E. A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom. The 6Rs approach. Applied Language Learning. 2006. Vol. 16. Pp. 39–64.
  12. Lyons J. Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP, 1990. 356 p.
  13. Crozet C. A conceptual framework to help teachers identify where culture is located in language use. Teaching invisible culture: Classroom practice and theory. Melbourne: Language Australia, 2003. Pp. 34–39.
  14. McKay S. Western culture and the teaching of English as an international language. English Teaching Forum Online. 2004. Vol. 42. No.2. Pp. 10–15.
  15. Kilickaya F. Authentic materials and cultural content in EFL classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal. 2004. Vol. 1. No. 7. Pp. 1–5.
  16. Sykes J. Learner request in Spanish: Examining the potential of multi-user environments: User-driven design and implementation for language learning. Teaching through multi-user virtual environments: Applying dynamic elements to the modern classroom. Hershey, PA: iGI Global, 2009. Pp. 238–305.
  17. Dewey J. Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan, 1938. 116 p.
  18. Hymes D.H. On Communicative Competence. Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings. Penguin, 1985. Pp. 269–293.
  19. Saito H., Beecken M. An approach to instruction of pragmatic aspects: Implications of pragmatic transfer by American learners of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal. 1997. Vol. 81. No. 3. Pp. 363–377.
  20. Barron A. Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. 403 p.
  21. Kim D., Hall J. The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal. 2002. Vol. 86. No. 3. Pp. 332–348.
  22. Huth T., Nikazm C. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research. 2006. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pp. 53–79.
  23. Mey L.J. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1993. 357 p.
  24. Krulatz A., Dixon T. Fostering Pragmatic Competence: Focus on Refusals. Tri-TESOL 2015 – Transcending Boundaries and Interweaving Perspectives: Conference Proceedings. 2016. Pp. 47–58.

Copyright (c) 2024 Pirogova N.G., Rozhkov G.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies