Agency development of high school students in the process of professional self-determination

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

An urgent problem in educational psychology is the effectiveness of students’ professional self-determination. At the same time, for successful self-determination it is necessary to possess the qualities of a full-fledged agent. Scientists, despite differences in the definitions of the concepts “agent” and “agency”, agree on general characteristics: the agent must have independence (autonomy), activity, responsibility, the ability for self-reflection and self-knowledge. All these are necessary qualities for high school students to make a conscious choice of their future profession. Accordingly, the development of student agency becomes particularly important in education. At the same time, students’ value orientations act as one of the components of the subject’s activity, as well as a factor in successful self-determination. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of the agency development of high school students in the process of professional development. The study involved two samples of students (eleventh and ninth grades of a secondary school). Ninth grade students were divided into an experimental group, which received professional self-determination training, and a control group, which received training as usual. Diagnostic sections in the ninth grade took place in three stages: before the training, immediately after the training (19 weeks later) and on the same sample in the 10th grade (7 months after the second section). The questionnaire of the stages of agency development of high school students (OSS-SH) and the projective method of assessing the states of the stages of agency development of students were used as diagnostic methods. Mathematical processing of the obtained data was carried out by using the Wilcoxon T-test to compare changes in parameters over time, and the non-parametric tau-Kendall correlation coefficient to identify relationships. As a result of the study, features of the agency development of high school students in the process of professional self-determination were identified, including the integrity of the stages, the influence of career guidance activities, in this case training, on changes in the states of the stages of agency as well as the relationship between the agency development and the value of the stage for the student and understanding of the necessary steps to achieve the ideal stage level. The practical significance of this study is in substantiating the need for career guidance training for high school students in order to increase educational motivation, independence and the quality of the work they perform.

About the authors

Evgeniya S. Volkova

Samara Branch of Moscow City Pedagogical University

Email: volkova.es2014@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-3546-7161

Postgraduate Student of Pedagogical and Applied Psychology Department

Russian Federation, 76, Stara Zagora st., Samara, 443081

Alexander V. Kaptsov

Samara Branch of Moscow City Pedagogical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: avkaptsov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7999-6546
SPIN-code: 1469-9079

Doc. Psych. Sci., Professor of Pedagogical and Applied Psychology Department

Russian Federation, 76, Stara Zagora st., Samara, 443081

References

  1. Markova E.A. Tsennostnyye oriyentatsii professional’nogo samoopredeleniya uchashchikhsya starshikh klassov [Value orientations of professional self-determination of high school students]. Sotsial’nyye i gumanitarnyye nauki: teoriya i praktika. 2019. No. 1 (3). Pp. 284–292. EDN: ODUXNE.
  2. Zhuravlev A.L., Kupreychenko A.B. Ekonomicheskoye samoopredeleniye: Teoriya i empiricheskiye issledovaniya [Economic self-determination: Theory and empirical research]. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN Publ., 2007. 480 p.
  3. Abul’khanova K.A. Psikhologiya i soznaniye lichnosti (problemy metodologii, teorii i issledovaniya real’noy lichnosti): Izbrannyye psikhologicheskiye Trudy [Psychology and personality consciousness (problems of methodology, theory and research of real personality): Selected psychological works]. Moscow: Moskovskiy psikhologo-sotsial’nyy institut; Voronezh: NPO «MODEK» Publ., 1999. 216 p.
  4. Brushlinskiy A.V. O kriteriyakh sub”yekta i ego deyatel’nosti [On the criteria of the agency and his activities]. Psikhologicheskiye osnovy professional’noy deyatel’nosti: khrestomatiya. Ed. By V.A. Bodrov. Moscow: Per Se: Logos Publ., 2007. Pp. 114–118.
  5. Anan’yev B.G. Psikhologicheskaya struktura cheloveka kak sub”yekta [Psychological structure of man as a agent]. Chelovek i obshchestvo. Leningrad, 1967. Vol. 2. Pp. 235–249.
  6. Panov V.I. Sub”yektnost’ pedagoga v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obrazovaniya: ekopsikhologicheskiy aspekt [Teacher’s agency in the context of digitalization of education: eco-psychological aspect]. Pedagog v kontekste lichnostnogo i professional’nogo razvitiya: real’nost’ i perspektivy: Kollektivnaya monografiya. Ed. by L.M. Mitina. Moscow: Psikhologicheskiy institut RAO: Bakhrakh Publ., 2022. Pp. 63–73. EDN: RYNCWG.
  7. Panov V.I. Ekopsikhologicheskiye predposylki izucheniya psikhicheskoy aktivnosti [Ecopsychological prerequisites for the study of mental activity]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya. 2014. Vol. 3. No. 3 (11). Pp. 214–224. doi: 10.18500/2304-9790-2014-3-3-214-224
  8. Thomas D. Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology By Rom Harré Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Philosophy. 1981. No. 56 (215). Pp. 133–134. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100049913
  9. Pryazhnikov N.S. Professional’noye samoopredeleniye. Teoriya i praktika [Professional self-determination. Theory and practice]. Moscow: Academia Publ., 2008. 320 p.
  10. Tsygankova M.N. Formirovaniye sub”yektnosti kak usloviye proforiyentatsii obuchayushchikhsya s ogranichennymi vozmozhnostyami zdorov’ya: dis. kand. ps. nauk [Agency development as a condition for career guidance of students with disabilities: thesis cand. of ps. sci.]. Moscow: NANO VO «Institut mirovykh tsivilizatsiy» Publ., 2016. 275 p.
  11. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology. 2008. No. 49 (3). Pp. 82–185. doi: 10.1037/a0012801.
  12. Hauskeller M. The Things That Really Matter: Philosophical conversations on the cornerstones of life. London: UCL Press, 2022. 294 p. doi: 10.14324/111.9781800082175.
  13. Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Vol. 49. Cross-Cultural Differences in Perspectives on the Self. Lincoln (NB), 2003. Pp. 1– 57.
  14. Gutman L.M., Schoon I. Aiming high, aiming low, not knowing where to go: Career aspirations and later outcomes of adolescents with special educational needs. International Journal of Educational Research. 2018. Vol. 89. P. 92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.002
  15. Ng-Knight T., Schoon I. Can locus of control compensate for socioeconomic adversity in the transition from school to work? Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2017. Vol. 46. No. 10. Pр. 2114–2128. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0720-6.
  16. Reeve J., Tseng C.M. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2011. No. 36. Pp. 257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
  17. Reeve J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013. No. 105. Pp. 579–595. doi: 10.1037/a0032690.
  18. Patall E.A., Pituch K.A., Steingut R.R., Vasquez A.C., Yates N., Kennedy A. Agency and high school science students’ motivation, engagement, and classroom support experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2019. No. 62. Pp. 77–92. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2019.01.004.
  19. Arnold J., Clarke D.J. What is ‘agency’? Perspectives in science education research. International Journal of Science Education. 2014. Vol. 36. No. 5. Pp. 735–754. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.825066.
  20. Aron I.S. Agency in Professional Self-Determination of Adolescents with Special Social Situations of Development. Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2017. No. 13 (4). Pp. 64–72. doi: 10.17759/chp.2017130407.
  21. Bateman T.S. Agency Is the Highest Level of Personal Competence. 2022. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/getting-proactive/202203/agency-is-the-highest-level-personal-competence (accessed September 20, 2023).
  22. Côté J.E., Bynner J.M. Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UKand Canada: The role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies. 2018. No. 11. Pp. 251–268.
  23. Côté J.E., Levine C.G. Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2002. 247 p.
  24. Elmore T. How Parents Can Steal Agency From Their Kids. 2023. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/artificial-maturity/202307/how-parents-can-steal-agency-from-their-kids (accessed September 20, 2023).
  25. Gray P., Lancy D.F., Bjorklund D.F. Decline in Independent Activity as a Cause of Decline in Children’s Mental Wellbeing: Summary of the Evidence. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2003. No. 260 (2). doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.02.004
  26. Antopol’skaya T.A., Panov V.I., Silakov A.S. Modelirovaniye razvitiya sub”yektnosti podrostkov pokoleniya Z v usloviyakh sotsial’no-obogashchennoy sredy dopolnitel’nogo obrazovaniya [Modeling the development of subjectivity of adolescents of generation Z in the conditions of a socially enriched environment of additional education]. Gertsenovskiye chteniya: psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya v obrazovanii. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 43–50. doi: 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-5. EDN PSTRUO.
  27. Kaptsov A.V., Matasova I.L., Shatalina M.A. Ustoychivost’ effekta razvivayushchey programmy po formirovaniyu stressoustoychivosti na stanovleniye sub”yektnosti studentov [Sustainability of the effect of a developmental program for the formation of stress resistance on the agency development of students]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya. 2022. Vol. 11, No. 1 (41). Pp. 4–15. doi: 10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-1-4-15. EDN DRPLOW.
  28. Volkova E.S., Kaptsov A.V. Osobennosti faktorov stanovleniya sub”yektnosti i sposobov vypolneniya uchebnykh deystviy uchashchikhsya starshikh klassov [Features of factors in the formation of subjectivity and methods of performing educational actions for high school students]. Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2021. No. 1 (29). Pp. 42–65. EDN: HDUCMI
  29. Volkova E.S., Kaptsov A.V., Panov V.I. Proyektivnaya metodika opredeleniya sostoyaniya stadiy stanovleniya sub”yektnosti uchashchikhsya [Projective methodology for determining the state of the stages of formation of student agency]. Gertsenovskiye chteniya: psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya v obrazovanii. 2022. No. 5. Pp. 500–508. doi: 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2022-5-64.
  30. Panov V.I. Etapy ovladeniya professional’nymi deystviyami: ekopsikhologicheskaya model’ stanovleniya sub”yektnosti [Stages of mastering professional actions: an eco-psychological model of the agency development]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 16–25. EDN: YQFMSJ
  31. Panov V.I., Kaptsov A.V. Struktura stadiy stanovleniya sub”yektnosti obuchayushchikhsya: svyaznost’, tselostnost’, formalizatsiya [The structure of the stages of students’ agency development: coherence, integrity, formalization]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye. 2021. Vol. 26. No. 4. Pp. 91–103. doi: 10.17759/pse.2021260408

Copyright (c) 2023 Volkova E.S., Kaptsov A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies