Multimodal Patterns of Speech Disfluencies Compensators (Based on Student Dialogic Discourse)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Speech as a multidimensional phenomenon still remains relevant in linguistics studies. It is known that verbal communication evolved later than non-verbal one, however, a multimodal approach to language communication modeling based on spontaneous dialogues is only gaining momentum in Russian linguistics studies.The aim of the article is to provide data on principles of verbal and non-verbal correlation at times of difficulty during the development of spoken discourse between two speakers, as well as to systematize them in the most frequent multimodal patterns.The material of the article is 16 video clips of spontaneous dialogues of Russian native speakers, the total timing is 1.5 hours. The annotated video materials are students’ spontaneous dialogic discourse. The topics of dialogues can be divided into two groups – communication between friends/colleagues and communication between the client and service staff. Each video clip is annotated in ELAN v.6.2. The presented results are based on general linguistic methods of description and comparison, as well as a method of analyzing a cognitive event. Analyzing cognitive events and providing statistics on the subject, we describe the main multimodal patterns, which have been classified by the frequent nature of some speech disfluencies and non-verbal response to them. Our study is based on the gestural repetition concept. As a result, the most common speech disfluencies have been identified and divided into five large blocks. Each of the blocks is accompanied by the main multimodal patterns, implemented in different channels – manual channel, gaze channel and cephalic channel. The number of speech disfluencies recorded at the external level directly depends on the topic and not always on the level of competence of the speakers, since all dialogues are improvised by students who only have presuppositions regarding the deployment of discourse depending on the given role.Speech disfluencies and the principles of their compensation in different multimodal channels depend on both internal (cognitive) and external factors (overlapping and interruptions), which represent an interpenetrating indivisible system.

About the authors

Sofya Vyacheslavovna Ukhobotova

Siberian Federal University

Email: ukhobotova.sofya25@gmail.com
pr. Svobodnyy, 82a, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660041

References

  1. Napier J. Hands. US: Princeton University Press, 1993. 200 p.
  2. Подлесская В. И., Кирбик А. А. Самоисправления говорящего и другие типы речевых сбоев как объект аннотирования в корпусах устной речи // Научно-техническая информация. Серия 2: Информационные процессы и системы. 2007. № 2. С. 2–23.
  3. Ахутина Т. В. Порождение речи. Нейролингвистический анализ синтаксиса. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 1989. 424 с.
  4. Dell G. A Spreading-activation Theory of Retrieval in Sentence production // Psychological Review. 1986. Vol. 93. P. 283–321.
  5. Красиков Ю. В. Теория речевых ошибок (на материале ошибок наборщика). М.: Наука, 1980. 124 с.
  6. Levelt W. J. M. Monitoring and Self-repair in Speech // Cognition. 1983. Vol. 14. Р. 41–104.
  7. Леонтьев А. А. Психолингвистические единицы и порождение речевого высказывания. М.: Наука, 2003. 250 с.
  8. Postma A. Detection of Errors during Speech Production: A Review of Speech Monitoring Models // Cognition. 2000. Vol. 77. P. 97–131.
  9. Eisler F. G. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. Academic Press Inc., 1968. 169 p.
  10. Kendon A. Origins of Modern Gesture Studies // Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language / eds. S. Duncan, J. Cassell, E. T. Levy. 2007. P. 1–11.
  11. Calbris G. Elements of Meaning in Gesture. Amsterdam: Philadelphia (PA), 2011. 378 p.
  12. Loehr D. P. Temporal, Structural and Pragmatic Synchrony between Intonation and Gesture // Laboratory Phonology. 2012. Vol. 3 (1). P. 71–89.
  13. Graf H. P. et al. Visual prosody: Facial Movements Accompanying Speech // Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. 2002. P. 396–401.
  14. Fung H., Mok P. Temporal Coordination between Focus Prosody and Pointing Gestures in Cantonese // Journal of Phonetics, 2018. Vol. 71. P. 113–125.
  15. Korotaev N. A. et al. Disfluencies in Russian Spoken Monologues: A Distributional Analysis // Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference «Dialogue 2020». 2020. P. 454–466.
  16. Watzlawick P., Beavin J. H., Jackson Don D. Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. London: Faber and Faber, 1968. 296 p.
  17. Леонов И. В. Паттерны культурно-исторического процесса: парадигмально-тематический анализ: автореф. дис. … д-ра культурологии. СПб., 2015. 41 с.
  18. Chistova E. V. Interactivity of simultaneous interpreters as actors of a cognitive event // J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2020. Vol. 13 (3). P. 375–384.
  19. Колмогорова А. В., Чистова Е. В. Когнитивный механизм порождения креативных решений в переводческой деятельности // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2: Языкознание. 2020. № 3. С. 59–71.
  20. Колмогорова А. В. Languaging: язык в точке пересечения коммуникации и когниции // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2017. № 29. С. 95–103.
  21. Adda G. et al. Speech Overlap and Interplay with Disfluencies in Political Interviews. 2007. P. 41–46.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).