电邮这篇文章 FACTORS DETERMINING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING OF PATIENTSWITH SPINAL CORD INJURY
- 作者: Buliubash I.D.1, Groznova E.V1
-
隶属关系:
- Federal State Budgetary Institution «Privolzhsky Federal Research Medical Centre» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- 期: 卷 21, 编号 3-4 (2018)
- 页面: 183-188
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1560-9537/article/view/36011
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9537-2018-21-3-183-188
- ID: 36011
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Achieving psychological well-being is one of the perspective tasks of psychological rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury. The aim of the study is the focusing of psychological factors making the greatest contribution to psychological well-being of the patients. Psychodiagnostic methods were used for the study, the indicators of which characterized psychological well-being, life hardiness, emotional status, and social environment. 50 patients undergoing in-patient rehabilitation were examined. Identified using correlation analysis of the ratio indicate the need for inclusion in the recovery process of psycho-diagnostic measures the diagnosis of the degree of life hardiness (stress resistance), emotional state, social networks and quality of communication, as well as on the diagnosis of motivational states. Understanding the factors that predict psychological well-being of patients with spinal cord injury is an important aspect of their psychological rehabilitation, since they can become foci that determine the intervention of the therapist.
作者简介
Irina Buliubash
Federal State Budgetary Institution «Privolzhsky Federal Research Medical Centre» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: info@nniito.ru
MD, PhD, Senior Researcher of Federal State Budgetary Institution «Privolzhsky Federal Research Medical Centre» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 603155, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation 603155, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
E. Groznova
Federal State Budgetary Institution «Privolzhsky Federal Research Medical Centre» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation603155, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
参考
- Dijkers M.Р., Abela M.B., Gans B.M., Gordan W.A. The Aftermath of Spinal Cord Injury. In S.L. Stover, J.A. DeLisa, G.G. Whiteneck. eds. Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcome from the Model System. Gothenburg: Aspen Publisher, 1995: 335.
- Cummins R.A., Mellor D., Stokes M. Lau ALMeasures of subjective well-being. In: Mpofu E., Oakland T. eds. Rehabilitation and health assessment: applying ICF guidelines. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 2010: 409-26.
- Ryff C.D. Psychological well-being. Barren Encyclopedia of gerontology: age, aging, and aged. eds. J.E. San Diego. CA: Academic Press. 1996; 365-9.
- Лебедева А.А. Качество жизни лиц с ограниченными возможностями здоровья: от средового подхода к личностному. Культурно-историческая психология. 2012; (1): 83-91.
- deRoon-Cassini T.A., de St. Aubin E., Valvano A., et al. Psychological well-being after spinal cord injury: perception of loss and meaning making. Rehabil. Psychol. 2009; 54 (3): 306-14.
- Cummins RA, Mellor D, Stokes M, Lau AL Measures of subjective well-being. In: Mpofu E., Oakland T., eds. Rehabilitation and health assessment: applying ICF guidelines. New York: Springer Publishing Co, 2010: 409-26.
- Tate D.G., Forchheimer M., Bombardier C.H., Heinemann A.W. et al. Differences in quality of life outcomes among depressed spinal cord injury trial participants. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2015; 96 (2): 340-8.
- Migliorini C., Tonge B. Reflecting on subjective well-being and spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 2009; 41 (6): 445-550.
- Ville I., Ravaud J.F., Tetrafigap Group. Subjective well-being and severe motor impairments: the Tetrafigap survey on the long-term outcome of tetraplegic spinal cord injured persons. Soc. Sci. Med. 2001; 52 (3): 369-84.
- Martin Ginis K.A., Jetha A., Mack D.E. et al. Physical activity and subjective well-being among people with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48 (1): 65-72.
- Meade M.A., Reed K.S., Saunders L.L. et al. It’s All of the Above: Benefits of Working for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015; 21 (1): 1-9.
- Middleton J., Tran Y., Craig A. Relationship between quality of life and self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007; 88 (12): 1643-8.
- Шевеленкова Т.Д., Фесенко Т.П. Психологическое благополучие личности. Психологическая диагностика. 2005; (3): 95-121.
- Елшанский С.П., Ануфриев А.Ф., Камалетдинова З.Ф., Сапарин О.Е., Семенов Д.В. Русскоязычная версия шкалы надежды Ч.Р. Снайдера. Современные научные исследования и инновации. 2014; (7): 56-60.
- Леонтьев Д.А., Рассказова Е.И. Тест жизнестойкости. Методическое руководство по новой методике психологической диагностики личности с широкой областью применения. М.: Смысл, 2006.
- Zigmond A.S., Snaith R.P. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983; 67 (6): 361-70.
- Lubben J., Blozik E., Gillmann G., Iliffe S., von Renteln K.W., Beck J.C., Stuck A.E. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006; 46 (4): 503-13.
- Казьмина О.Ю. Социальные сети и развитие социального поведения: Руководство по оценке уровня развития социального поведения. М: 1993; 32-48.
- Zimet G.D., Dahlem N.W., Zimet S.G., Farley G.K. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J. Person. Ass. 1988; 52 (1): 30-41.
- Корытова Г.С. Модификация психодиагностической методики «MSPSS» для изучения ресурсов совладания. Современные наукоемкие технологии. 2007; (3): 77 20. - 80.
补充文件
