Monitoring client feedback in the context of common factors theory in psychotherapy
- Authors: Abitov I.R.1, Gorodetskaya I.M.2, Gorobets E.A.1, Abdulina R.R.3, Mendelevich V.D.1,4
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan Federal University
- Kazan National Research Technological University
- Central City Clinical Hospital No 18, Kazan
- Kazan State Medical University
- Issue: Vol LVII, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 284-292
- Section: Original study arcticles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1027-4898/article/view/349014
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/nb686754
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NYXIYB
- ID: 349014
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The issue of common factors in psychotherapy remains debatable, while their study is important for improving the effectiveness of psychological care. Feedback scales serve as one of the tools for researching changes in a client’s condition during psychological assistance and assessing the client’s perception of communication with a specialist.
AIM: To identify the effectiveness of feedback scales (the Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale) for monitoring client work effectiveness.
METHODS: Modified versions of the Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale were used, adapted based on personality relations theory, as translated by Bogomolov, Dmitrievsky, and Pavlovsky. The Outcome Rating Scale was additionally modified by the authors of this article. The Outcome Rating Scale was administered at the beginning of each session, while the Session Rating Scale was used during the final 5–10 minutes of each session. Solution-focused brief therapy served as the primary therapeutic method, with Myasishchev’s personality relations theory forming the conceptual basis for shaping certain therapeutic hypotheses.
RESULTS: The analysis units included data from 151 sessions conducted with 34 clients (28 women and 6 men) aged 18 to 55. The sessions were conducted by a specialist with higher psychological education (one of the article’s co-authors). Normative values were obtained for the first and subsequent sessions using the modified Outcome Rating Scale; however, establishing normative values for the Session Rating Scale proved impossible due to extreme unevenness of score distribution. Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency. Data revealed significant changes from the first to last session in clients’ self-assessment of personal well-being, family/intimate relationship quality, general well-being, therapist-client relationship perception, and overall session evaluation.
CONCLUSION: The Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale are reliable tools for monitoring changes in client status and therapeutic relationship quality, and can be used to assess the effectiveness of psychological care.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Ildar R. Abitov
Kazan Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: ildar-abitov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6532-1284
SPIN-code: 4064-3294
Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, KazanInna M. Gorodetskaya
Kazan National Research Technological University
Email: innamgor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1781-0953
SPIN-code: 4958-3275
Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, KazanElena A. Gorobets
Kazan Federal University
Email: elena_gorobets@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3859-5543
SPIN-code: 1702-2146
Cand. Sci. (Philology)
Russian Federation, KazanRezeda R. Abdulina
Central City Clinical Hospital No 18, Kazan
Email: akbrezeda@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4795-6934
SPIN-code: 9023-5380
Russian Federation, Kazan
Vladimir D. Mendelevich
Kazan Federal University; Kazan State Medical University
Email: mendelevich_vl@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8476-6083
SPIN-code: 2302-2590
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, Kazan; KazanReferences
- Wampold BE. The basics of psychotherapy: an introduction to theory and practice. 1st ed. Published by the American Psychological Association; 2012. 160 p. ISBN: 978-1433807503
- Bailey RJ, Ogles BM. General factors of effective psychotherapy. An integrated approach to treatment. Saint-Petersburg: Dialektika; 2024. 304 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-907515-77-2
- Bogomolov V, Kiselnikova N, Konkin V, Krysko N. The skill of a psychotherapist: Effective practice and training. Moscow: Centr Bogomolovova; 2023. 196 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-0060-3425-9
- Kholmogorova AB, Garanyan NG, Nikitina IV, Pugovkina OD. Research concerning the process and efficacy of psychotherapy: current situation. Part I. Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2009;19(3):92–100. EDN: KYYRSL
- Kholmogorova AB, Garanyan NG, Nikitina IV, Pougovkina OD. Research concerning the process of psychotherapy and its efficacy: current situation. Part 2. Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2010;20(1):70–79. EDN: MSRROB
- Kholmogorova AB, Garanyan NG, Pugovkina ОD. Research on the effectiveness of psychotherapy for mental disorders: history and current state of the problem. Moscow: Neolit; 2022. 240 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-6046371-2-8
- Frank JD, Frank JB. Persuasion and healing: a comparative study of psychotherapy. Baltimore; London: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1993. 343 р. ISBN: 0-8018-4067-8
- Miller SD, Duncan BL, Hubble MA. Beyond integration: The triumph of outcome over process in clinical practice. Psychotherapy in Australia. 2004;10(2):2–19.
- Miller SD, Hubble MA, Chow DL, Seidel JA. The outcome of psychotherapy: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Psychotherapy. 2013;50(1):88–97. doi: 10.1037/a0031097
- Castonguay LG, Barkham M, Lutz W, McAleavy A. Practice oriented research: approaches and applications. In: Lambert MJ, editor. Bergin & Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Approaches and Applications Publisher: John Wiley & SonsEditors; 2013. P. 85–133.
- Lambert MJ. Outcome in psychotherapy: the past and important advances. Psychotherapy. 2013;50(1):42–51. doi: 10.1037/a0030682
- Owen J, Hilsenroth MJ. Treatment adherence: the importance of therapist flexibility in relation to therapy outcomes. J Couns Psychol. 2014;61(2):280–288. doi: 10.1037/a0035753
- Laska KM, Gurman AS, Wampold BE. Expanding the lens of evidence-based practice in psychotherapy: a common factors perspective. Psychotherapy. 2014;51(4):467–481. doi: 10.1037/a0034332
- Bogomolov VA, Dmitrievskiy PV, Milovanova EA, et al. Outcome rating scale (ORS): results of preliminary research of adaptation of outcome rating scale in russian language for receiving feedback from the clients regarding changes during psychological practice. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2013;(3):179–189. EDN: RPUAIT
- Duncan BL, Miller SD, Sparks JA, et al. The session rating scale: preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measure. Journal of brief Therapy. 2003;3(1):3–12.
- Reese RJ, Gillaspy JA, Owen JJ, et al. The influence of demand characteristics and social desirability on clients’ ratings of the therapeutic alliance. J Clin Psychol. 2013;69(7):696–709. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21946
- De Jong K, Conijn JM, Gallagher RA, et al. Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: a multilevel meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;85:102002. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102002
- Karpova EB, Isurina GL, Zhuravlev AL. Psychology of relations by V.N. Miasishchev: origins and contents. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2020;41(2):5–14. doi: 10.31857/S020595920008488-2
- Bogomolov VA. The magic of the client. The tradition of short-term psychotherapy. Moscow: Ridero.ru; 2015. 111 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 9785447431198
Supplementary files


