Psychotic Experiences Questionnaire. Part 2

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On the basis of the concept of psychotic and psychotic-like experiences, delusions and auditory hallucinations presented in Part 1 of this article, the structure of the links between psychotic experiences and social anxiety and its components and psychological parameters is analyzed. A mediator model of the relationship between social anxiety and the phase of psychotic alienation — "experiencing external control" — is discussed.

AIM: To investigate the parameters and stages of development of psychotic and psychotic-like experiences registered with the Psychotic Experiences Questionnaire in the context of analyzing the structure of relationships with psychological variables (social anxiety, metacognitive and cognitive phenomena). Тo construct a mediator model of the indirect effect of social anxiety components on the “experience of being controlled externally” mediated by thought suppression (“polar bear effect”).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample — 122 respondents, includes non-clinical and two clinical groups — with symptoms of the affective spectrum and with symptoms of the psychotic spectrum. The author's ‘Psychotic Experiences Questionnaire’ was used to assess the severity of psychotic experiences, the scales of which represent the phases of the unfolding of the experiences. Social anxiety and its components (author's “Social Anxiety and Social Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire”), cognitive (“Cognitive Flexibility Questionnaire”, “Behavioural Self-Regulation Style — SSPM 2020” questionnaire) and metacognitive (Thought Suppression Scale, author's “Self-Focused Attention Questionnaire”) strategies were determined.

RESULTS: Pearson correlation analysis showed significant ‘direct’ associations of early and moderate psychotic and psychotic-like experiences with social anxiety and its components, metacognitive (self-focused attention and thought suppression) parameters, and ‘inverse’ links with cognitive parameters (cognitive component of conscious self-regulation and cognitive flexibility). Correlations with psychological parameters become insignificant in intense psychotic experiences. Using mediator analysis, the full indirect effects of the social anxiety components influence on the enhancement of “experiencing being controlled externally” as a phase of psychotic experiences maximum intensity were measured (mediator — thought suppression).

CONCLUSION: Metacognitive strategies, social anxiety, disturbed self-regulation and flexibility play an important role in the genesis and maintenance of psychotic experiences. Significant correlations of the parameters with psychotic experience are shown, but at the height of alienation the significant correlations weaken. At the height of psychotic experience in the absence of direct effects it is possible to explicate the indirect influence of the predictor — social anxiety on the experience of controllability from the outside, mediated by thought suppression.

This article is a continuation of the article by Sagalakova OA, Truevtsev DV, Zhirnova OV. Psychotic Experiences Questionnaire. Part 1. Neurology Bulletin. 2024;56(1):23–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/nb623959

About the authors

Olga A. Sagalakova

Moscow State University of Psychology & Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: olgasagalakova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9975-1952
SPIN-code: 4455-7179

PhD, Cand. Sci. (Psichol.), Assoc. Prof., Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Experimental Pathopsychology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitry V. Truevtsev

Moscow State University of Psychology & Education

Email: truevtsev@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4246-2759
SPIN-code: 2983-0984

PhD, Cand. Sci. (Psichol.), Assoc. Prof., Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Experimental Pathopsychology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Olga V. Zhirnova

Moscow State University of Psychology & Education

Email: olga.zhirnova.2015@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6680-8286
SPIN-code: 6870-8526

Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Experimental Pathopsychology, Medical Psychologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Dixon LB, Goldman HH, Srihari VH, Kane JM. Transforming the treatment of schizophrenia in the United States: The RAISE initiative. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14:237–258. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084934
  2. McAusland L, Buchy L, Cadenhead KS et al. Anxiety in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017;11(6):480–487. doi: 10.1111/eip.12274
  3. Kuhney FS, Damme KSF, Pelletier-Baldelli A et al. Prevalence and functional consequences of social anxiety in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Perspective from a community sample comparison. Schizophrenia Bulletin Open. 2021;2(1):sgab025. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgab025
  4. Michail M, Birchwood M. Social anxiety disorder in first-episode psychosis: Incidence, phenomenology and relationship with paranoia. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(3):234–241. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053124
  5. González-Blanch C, Gleeson JF, McEnery C et al. The impact of persistent social anxiety on social functioning and health-related quality of life in young people with remitted first-episode psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022;16(8):868–874. doi: 10.1111/eip.13228
  6. Borghi AM, Fernyhough C. Concepts, abstractness and inner speech. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023;378(1870):20210371. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0371
  7. Longden E, Corstens D, Bowe S et al. A psychological intervention for engaging dialogically with auditory hallucinations (Talking With Voices): A single-site, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Schizophr Res. 2022;250:172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.11.007
  8. Larøi F, Thomas N, Aleman A et al. The ice in voices: Understanding negative content in auditory-verbal hallucinations. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;67:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.11.001
  9. Sagalakova OA, Truevcev DV, Zhirnova OV. Voices in the structure of psychotic experiences: the role of social anxiety and metacognitive strategies. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2023;31(4):86–104. (In Russ.) EDN: ZCVMNF doi: 10.17759/ cpp.2023310405
  10. Sagalakova OA, Truevcev DV, Zhirnova OV, Tinekov AV. The effects of social anxiety and shame in voice development: metacognitive processing of adverse relationship experiences and vigilance toward social threats. Clinical Psychology and Special Education. 2023;12(2):25–53. (In Russ.) EDN: NGBNNL doi: 10.17759/cpse.2023120202
  11. Parnas J, Yttri JE, Urfer-Parnas A. Phenomenology of auditory verbal hallucination in schizophrenia: An erroneous perception or something else? Schizophr Res. 2024;265:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.03.045
  12. Perona-Garcelán S, López-Jiménez AM, Bellido-Zanin G et al. The relationship with the voices as a dialogical experience: The role of self-focused attention and dissociation. J Clin Psychol. 2020;76(3):549–558. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22890
  13. Roy NA, Bak JH, Akrami A et al. Efficient inference for time-varying behavior during learning. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2018;31:5695–5705.
  14. Mendelevich VD. “Semantic void” of some of psychiatric terms used in the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Neurology Bulletin. 2023;55(2):5–11. (In Russ.) EDN: WXXTDW doi: 10.17816/nb397614
  15. Truevcev DV, Sagalakova OA, Zhirnova OV. Modern pathopsychology and psychopathology at the stage of revision of classifications of mental illnesses: understanding the logic of interaction, problems and prospects of development. Neurology Bulletin. 2021;55(4):78–86. (In Russ.) EDN: LAPPRV doi: 10.17816/nb88000
  16. Freeman D, Fowler D. Routes to psychotic symptoms: Trauma, anxiety and psychosis-like experiences. Psychiatry Res. 2009;169(2):107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.07.009
  17. Chang WC, Ng CM, Chan KN, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity in individuals at-risk for psychosis: Relationships with symptoms, cognition and psychosocial functioning. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021;15(3):616–623. doi: 10.1111/eip.12992
  18. Mendelevich VD. Overdiagnosis of schizophrenia as a cognitive distortion of the process of knowledge of clinical reality. Neurology Bulletin. 2023;55(1):5–14. (In Russ.) EDN: ZWAXRT doi: 10.17816/nb160308
  19. Fonseca-Pedrero E, Debbane M, Ortuno-Sierra J et al. The structure of schizotypal personality traits: A cross-national study. Psychol Med. 2018;48(3):451–462. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717001829
  20. Deng W, Addington J, Bearden CE et al. Characterizing sustained social anxiety in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: Trajectory, risk factors, and functional outcomes. Psychol Med. 2023;53(8):3644–3651. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722000277
  21. Deng W, Addington J, Bearden CE et al. Depression predicts global functional outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2021;3(4):163–171. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20210023
  22. Gurovich IYa, Shashkova NG, Visnevskaya LYa et al. The recovery model of psychiatric care users with schizophrenia (personal and social empowerment): discussion of the concept and its perspectives. Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2013;23(2):89–95. (In Russ.) EDN: QADGWH
  23. Kholmogorova AB, Rychkova OV, Kholmogorova AB, Rychkova OV. Violations of social cognition — a new paradigm in the study of central psychological deficit in schizophrenia. Moscow: Forum; 2016. 288 p. (In Russ.) EDN: WLJEBH
  24. Harkness KL, Hayden EP, Lopez-Duran NL. Stress sensitivity and stress sensitization in psychopathology: An introduction to the special section. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015;124(1):1–3. doi: 10.1037/abn0000041
  25. Geddes G, Ehlers A, Freeman D. Hallucinations in the months after a trauma: An investigation of the role of cognitive processing of a physical assault in the occurrence of hallucinatory experiences. Psychiatry Res. 2016;246:601–605. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.081
  26. Pruessner M, Cullen AE, Aas M, Walker EF. The neural diathesis-stress model of schizophrenia revisited: An update on recent findings considering illness stage and neurobiological and methodological complexities. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;73:191–218. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.013
  27. Bernardo M, Bioque M, Cabrera B et al. Modelling gene-environment interaction in first episodes of psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2017;189:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.058
  28. Selten JP, Cantor-Graae E. Social defeat: risk factor for schizophrenia? Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:101–102. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.2.101
  29. Marschall TM, Brederoo SG, Ćurčić-Blake B, Sommer IEC. Deafferentation as a cause of hallucinations. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2020;33(3):206–211. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000586
  30. Romme M, Escher S. Making sense of voices: A guide for professionals who work with voice hearers. London: MIND Publications; 2000. 143 p.
  31. Farina EA, Mourgues-Codern C, Sibarium E, Powers AR. Recent social stress and severity of auditory hallucinations. Schizophr Res. 2024;269:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.04.024
  32. Sagalakova OA, Truevcev DV, Zhirnova OV. Psychotic experiences questionnaire. Part 1. Neurology Bulletin. 2024;56(1):23–36. (In Russ.) EDN: AXCUPS doi: 10.17816/nb623959.
  33. Sagalakova OA, Truevtsev DV. Pathopsychology of social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Tomsk: publishing house of Tomsk University, 2016. 140 p. (In Russ.)
  34. Dorosheva EA, Knyazev GG. Psychometric properties of three emotion regulation questionnaires In: Modern problems of clinical psychology and personality psychology: Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University; 2017. p. 193–198. (In Russ.)
  35. Morosanova VI, Kondratyuk NG. VI Morosanova’s “self-regulation profile questionnaire — srpqm 2020”. Voprosy psihologii. 2020;(4):155–167. EDN: XLPKCR (In Russ.)
  36. Kurginyan SS, Osavolyuk EYu. The cognitive flexibility inventory (cfi): adaptation for russian-speaking sampling. Psihologicheskii Zhurnal. 2018;39(2):105–119. (In Russ.) EDN: TEUMEF doi: 10.7868/S0205959218020101
  37. Sagalakova OA, Truevtsev DV, Sagalakov AM. Violation of cognitive regulation of social anxiety in antivital behavior. Tomsk: Tomsk University, 2016. 107 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector



Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».