Modern ideas about the psyche: changing of the paradigm

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The problem of the psyche and consciousness has been the most mysterious one for a few thousand years and is still unresolved. It has been almost forgotten that Aristotle considered human psyche a structure that is not bound to the body. This idea did not persist, though. It was Hippocrates who ruined it and declared a different concept, which prevailed for many centuries, that the brain is a repository of all mental processes. Even such a genius as Rene Descartes took Hippocrates’s idea for granted and spent many months in attempts to find memory and emotions in gyrus and ventricles of the brain. This path — the search of material structures of the psyche — was followed by I.M. Sechenov, I.P. Pavlov and many others. Later, many other mistaken ideas were born, declared new and revolutionary ones and died prematurely. However, not only ideas died, but also patients, who were treated by methods developed on the basis of these hypotheses. The author formulates the idea of the brain as the biological interface and proves a non-material theory of the psyche, which is a discovery that requires a change in basic paradigms of human sciences.

About the authors

Mikhail М. Reshetnikov

Eastern-European Institute of Psychoanalysis

Author for correspondence.
Email: veip@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, 197198, St. Petersburg, Bolshoi highway of Petrograd side, 18-А

References

  1. Аристотель. О душе. М.: Наука. 1995; 121–123. [Aristotle. About the soul. М.: Nauka. 1995; 121–123. (In Russ.)]
  2. Декарт Р. Сочинения. В 2 т. Пер. с лат. и франц. М.: Мысль. 1989; 1: 654 с. [Descartes R. Works in 2 vols. Trans. from Lat. and Franz. M.: Thought. 1989; 1: 654 p. (In Russ.)]
  3. Сеченов И.М. Рефлексы головного мозга. М.: Министерство просвещения СССР. 1953; 31–117. [Sechenov I.M. Reflexes of the brain. M.: Ministry of education of the USSR. 1953; 31–117. (In Russ.)]
  4. Павлов И.П. Полное собрание трудов. В 5 т. М. — Ленинград: Академия наук СССР. 1949; III (1): 104, 482, 491, 515. [Pavlov I.P. Complete collected works. In 5 vol. Moscow-Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 1949; III (1): 104, 482, 491, 515. (In Russ.)]
  5. Lapin I.P., Oxenkrag G.F. Intensification of the central serotoninergic processes as a possible determinant of thymoleptic effect. Lancet. 1969; (1): 132–136.
  6. Фрейд З. Исследование истерии. СПб.: Восточно-европейский институт психоанализа. 2005; 454 с. [Freud S. The study of hysteria. Saint Petersburg: Eastern European Institute of Psychoanalysis. 2005; 454 p. (In Russ.)]
  7. Бехтерев В.М. Будущее психиатрии. Введение в патологическую рефлексологию. СПб.: Наука. 1997: 23. [Bekhterev V.M. The future of psychiatry: Introduction to pathological reflexology. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. 1997: 23. (In Russ.)]
  8. Дубровский Д.И. Проблема «сознание и мозг»: теоретическое решение. М.: Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация». 2015; 208 с. [Dubrovsky D.I. The problem of “consciousness and the brain”: a Theoretical solution. M.: Canon+ ROOI “Rehabilitation”. 2015; 208 p. (In Russ.)]
  9. Ленин В.И. Полное собрание сочинений. Изд. 4-е. М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы. 1941–1967; 4: 127. [Lenin V.I. Complete works. Ed. 4th. M.: State publishing house of political literature. 1941–1967; 4: 127. (In Russ.)]
  10. Терехов П.Г. И.М. Сеченов и материалистическая психология. М.: Академия наук СССР. 1957: 55–109. [Terekhov P.G. I.M. Sechenov and materialistic psychology. M.: Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 1957: 55–109. (In Russ.)]
  11. Решетников М.М. Психическое расстройство. СПб.: Восточно-европейский институт психоанализа. 2008; 272 с. [Reshetnikov M.M. Mental disorder. St. Petersburg: Eastern European Institute of Psychoanalysis. 2008; 272 p. (In Russ.)]
  12. Решетников М.М. Критический постматериализм в психологии и психиатрии. Неврол. вестн. 2011; XLIII (2): 66–69. [Reshetnikov M.M. Critical post-materialism in psychology and psychiatry. Neurological Bulletin. 2011; XLIII (2): 66–69. (In Russ.)]
  13. Лакан Ж. Функция и поле речи и языка в психоанализе. Доклад на Римском конгрессе, прочитанный в Институте психологии Римского университета 26 и 27 сентября 1953 г. М.: Гнозис. 1995; 1–23. [Lacan J. Function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. Report at the Congress of Rome, read at the Institute of psychology of the University of Rome on 26 and 27 September 1953. M.: Gnosis. 1995; 1–23. (In Russ.)]
  14. Фрейд З. Автопортрет. СПб.: Восточно-европейский институт психоанализа. 2006; 256 с. [Freud S. Self-portrait. Saint Petersburg: Eastern European Institute of Psychoanalysis. 2006; 256 p. (In Russ.)]
  15. Решетников М.М. Нематериальная теория психики. Форум молодых учёных. 2018; 6 (22): 1–7. [Reshetnikov M.M. Non-material theory of the psyche. Forum of young scientists. 2018; 6 (22): 1–7. (In Russ.)]
  16. Reshetnikov M.M. What is the psyche? What are we curing? J. Anthropol. 2017; 6 (3): 11–15.
  17. Reshetnikov M.M. Problem of relation between brain and mind in physiology, medicine and psychology. J. Psychiatry and Psychiatric Dis. 2017; 1 (6): 313–316.
  18. Reshetnikov M.M. During two thousand years we were looking for the psyche in a wrong place (Ideas live their own Life). Intern. J. Curr. Innovat. Adv. Res. 2018; 1 (4): 82–87.
  19. Reshetnikov M.M. Non-material theory of the psyche: Historical prerequisites, argumentation and practical implications. Intern. J. Psychol. Psychological Res. 2018; 3 (5): 1–7.
  20. Reshetnikov M.M. Non-material nature of the psyche. Psychological review. Am. Psychol. Assoc. 2018; 125: 1035–1047.
  21. Винер Н. Кибернетика или управление и связь в животном и машине. М.: Советское радио. 1968; 325 с. [Wiener N. Cybernetics or control and communication in an animal and a machine. M.: Sovetskoe radio. 1968; 325 p. (In Russ.)]
  22. Губачев Ю.М., Стабровский Е.М. Клинико-физиологические основы психосоматических соотношений. Ленинград: Медицина. 1981; 176 с. [Gubachev Yu.M., Stabrovsky E.M. Clinical and physiological bases psychosomatic relationships. Leningrad: Meditsina. 1981; 176 p. (In Russ.)]
  23. Volkan V. Traumatized societies. In: Violence and dialogue? Psychoanalytic insight on terror and terrorism. London: International Psychoanalytic Association. 2003; 217–237.
  24. Канеман Д. Думай медленно… решай быстро. М.: АСТ. 2013; 625 с. [Kahneman D. Think slowly ... decide quickly. M.: AST. 2013; 625 p. (In Russ.)]
  25. Лубовский В.И. Развитие словесной регуляции действий у детей (в норме и патологии). М.: Педагогика. 1978; 224 с. [Lubovsky V.I. Development of verbal regulation of actions in children (in normal and patology). M.: Pedagogy. 1978; 224 p. (In Russ.)]
  26. Петровский В.А. Психология неадаптивной активности. М.: МГУ. 1992; 45. [Petrovsky V.A. Psychology of non-adaptive activity. М.: MGU. 1992; 45. (In Russ.)]
  27. Bartra R. Society’s fascination with the wild outsider. The artificial savage: Modern myths of the wild man. Michigan. 1997; 3–52.
  28. Лурия А.Р. Маленькая книга о большой памяти. М.: Наука. 1968; 57 с. [Luria A.R. A small book about great memory. M.: Nauka. 1968; 57 p. (In Russ.)]
  29. Годфруа Ж. Что такое психология. В 2 т. Изд. 2-е, стереотипное. Пер. с франц. М.: Мир. 1996; 1: 496 с. [Godefroy J. What is psychology. In 2 vols. Ed. 2nd, stereotypical. Trans. Fr. M.: Mir. 1996; 1: 496 p. (In Russ.)]
  30. Гримак Л.П. Резервы человеческой психики. М.: Ленанд. 1989; 238 с. [Grimak L.P. Reserves of the human psyche. M.: Lenand. 1989; 238 p. (In Russ.)]
  31. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Res. 1996; (3): 131–141.
  32. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Mirrors in the mind. Sci. Am. Band. 2006; 295 (5): 30–37.
  33. Gardner R.A., Gardner B.T. Comparative psychology and language acquisition. In: Sebok T.A., Sebok J.-U. (eds.) Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. New York: Plenum Press. 1980; 287–329.
  34. Энгельс Ф. Роль труда в процессе превращения обезьяны в человека. В кн.: Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. М.: Политиздат. 1961; 20: 827 с. [Engels F. The Role of labor in the process of turning a monkey into a man. In: Marx K., Engels F. Essays. M.: Politizdat. 1961; 20: 827 p. (In Russ.)]

Copyright (c) 2020 Reshetnikov M.М.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies