Everyday life of women in Dubna of the 1950s-1960s

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article analyzes the structures of women's everyday life in the “science city” of Dubna, designed to become a showcase of socialism in the USSR of the 1950s-60s. We believe that during the years of the “Khrushchev thaw” and the rise of scientific centers throughout the country, women in these new towns found themselves in non-trivial conditions for traditional Soviet women's everyday life, where they gained the opportunity to implement their own life strategies in science and related fields. Few took advantage of this opportunity, however. Residents of the closed town of Dubna had access to special supplies and social infrastructure that was exemplary for that time; they were able to contact foreigners and enjoyed many cultural privileges. Triangulation of the sequences of biographical stories conveyed by representatives of different social strata, comparing them with media materials and extracts from normative sources led us to the conclusion that the traditional gender contract, subjected to only slight erosion in the first decades of the Soviet power, did not disappear at all - in fact, it took root in the “city of the future” inhabited by designers, inventors, and scientists. Due to the rigidity of this contract, the majority of Dubna's residents did not succeed in becoming, and did not want to become, independent actors seeking to declare themselves and their professional ambitions in science or the public sphere. We attempt to reveal the social role of such women through the prism of everyday life and social memory. We argue that it boiled down to the fulfillment of social expectations, the readiness to remain in service roles and provide a reliable rear support for their husbands-scientists who worked on major Soviet projects in the field of nuclear physics.

About the authors

N. L Pushkareva

Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: pushkarev@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia

A. V Zhidchenko

Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: travel822@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Белова А.В. Женская повседневность как предмет истории повседневности // Этнографическое обозрение. 2006. № 4. 85-97.
  2. Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. М.: Московский философский фонд, 1995.
  3. Жидкова Л.Ф. История Дубны. Дубна: [б.и.], 2006.
  4. Пушкарева Н.Л. Феминистский проект в новейшей этнологии и антропологии (1980-2000) // Этнографическое обозрение. 2004. № 3. С. 82-97.
  5. Пушкарева Н.Л. Методы и методология современной этнографической науки: вклад феминистской антропологии // Етнична iстория народiв Европи. T. 26. КиÏв: Наукова думка, 2008. С. 29-38.
  6. Пушкарева Н.Л. Труд и отдых женщин-ученых в советской и постсоветской России в оценках их самих // Этнографическое обозрение. 2021. № 3. С. 98-105. https://doi.org/10.31857/S086954150015498-7
  7. Пушкарева Н.Л., Жидченко А.В. Сибирский эксперимент в истории советского академического сообщества: бытовой и гендерный аспекты // QR. 2022. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 593-611. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.2.690
  8. Van Maanen J. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. L.: University of Chicago, 2011.
  9. Warren C., Hackney J. Gender Issues in Ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies