Non diis curae: the rhetoric and practices of natural punishment for sacrilege

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article analyzes situations in which punishment for sacrilege is carried out by natural actors without the intervention of the supernatural ones. Such actors include the state represented by lawmakers and law enforcers, religious specialists, as well as religious activists and ordinary believers. The configurations of agency of the three types of actors described in the article, which have their own specifics and tools for natural (as opposed to supernatural) retaliation for sacrilege, cause violent or non-violent resolution of conflicts in which representatives of either type see blasphemy and sacrilege. The article also analyzes the boundaries of actor agency related, on the one hand, to perceptions of the right to the sanctuary and, consequently, to anger over its desecration, and, on the other hand, to the real possibility to carry out this punishment. In the case of the latter, the notion of conditional agency of the “accused” by “prosecutors” is also discussed, and the ways and reasons for its reduction are considered.

About the authors

S. T Drozdov

European University at St. Petersburg

Email: sdrozdov@eu.spb.ru
St. Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Иванов С.А. Блаженные похабы: культурная история юродства. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2005.
  2. Лещинский А.Н. Особенности богородичного движения в России (из опыта социально-философского анализа). М.: РОИР, 2005.
  3. Лихачев Д.С., Панченко А.М., Понырко Н.В. Смех в Древней Руси. Л.: Наука, 1984.
  4. Масагутова М.Р. "Как оно ни есть, а все равно беседа была": онлайн-трансляции как новая религиозная практика общины чуриковцев // Этнография. 2021. № 4 (14). С. 138-157. https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2021-4(14)-138-157
  5. Панченко А.А. О пользе святотатства, или Pussy Riot глазами антрополога // Отечественные записки. 2013. № 1. С. 217-227.
  6. Штырков С.А. Наказание святотатцев: фольклорный мотив и нарративная схема // Труды факультета этнологии. Вып. 1 / Отв. ред. А.К. Байбурин. СПб.: Изд-во ЕУСПб, 2001. С. 198-210.
  7. Юргенсмейер М. "Ужас Мой пошлю пред тобою". Религиозное насилие в глобальном масштабе. М.: НЛО, 2022.
  8. Asad T. On Suicide Bombing. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 2007.
  9. Butler J. The Sensibility of Critique: Response to Asad and Mahmood // Is Critique Secular?: Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech / Eds. T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler, S. Mahmood. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009. P. 95-130. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823252381-005
  10. Clay E. The Orthodox Church of the Sovereign Mother of God/The New Cathar Church // Revisionism and Diversification in New Religious Movements / Ed. E. Barker. L.: Routledge, 2013. P. 93-94.
  11. Cliteur P., Herrenberg T. The Fall and Rise of Blasphemy Law. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2016.
  12. Emirbayer M., Mische A. What Is Agency? // American Journal of Sociology. 1998. Vol. 103 (4). P. 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
  13. Favret-Saada J. An Anthropology of Religious Polemics: The Case of Blasphemy Affairs // HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2016. Vol. 6 (1). P. 29-45. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.003
  14. Goode E., Ben-Yehuda N. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  15. Hanegraaff W.J. New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Though. Leiden: Brill, 1996.
  16. Hewson M. Agency // Encyclopedia of Case Study Research / Eds. A.J. Mills, G. Durepos, E. Wiebe. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., 2010. P. 13-17.
  17. Jones J. Let Me Take You Down: Inside the Mind of Mark David Chapman, the Man Who Killed John Lennon. N.Y.: Villard Books, 1992.
  18. Jones P. Blasphemy, Offensiveness and Law // British Journal of Political Science. 1980. Vol. 10 (2). P. 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002064
  19. Levy L.W. Blasphemy: Verbal Offense against the Sacred, from Moses to Salman Rushdie. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
  20. Nash D. Blasphemy in the Christian World: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  21. Oustinova-Stjepanovic G. End of Organized Atheism: The Genealogy of the Law on Freedom of Conscience and Its Conceptual Effects in Russia // History and Anthropology. 2020. Vol. 31 (5). P. 600-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2019.1684271
  22. Philo S. British Invasion: The Crosscurrents of Musical Influence. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.
  23. Temperman J., Koltay A. Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression: Comparative, Theoretical and Historical Reflections after the Charlie Hebdo Massacre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  24. Turner S. Beatles ‘66: The Revolutionary Year. N.Y.: Ecco, 2016.
  25. Walter N. Blasphemy Ancient and Modern. London: Rationalist Press Association, 1990.
  26. Wiener J.Come Together: John Lennon in His Time. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1991.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies