Evolutionary significance neotenic signs of human: biological and sociobiological approaches
- Authors: Volkov Y.K.1, Savinov A.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Lobachevsky National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University
- Issue: Vol 36, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 33-48
- Section: The philosophy of the himan being
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0236-2007/article/view/285955
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200725010035
- ID: 285955
Abstract
The article attempts to analyze the evolutionary significance of neotenic human traits using the example of two alternative research orientations: biological and sociobiological approaches. It is noted that a biological comparison of neotenic characteristics of humans and animals reveals a paradoxical correlation in terms of the adaptive mechanisms of natural selection, due to the changed relationship between the prolongation of the period of adulthood with its “superficial infantilism” and a slowdown in the time of formation of reproductive function. On this basis it is concluded that the biological meaning of neoteny which consists in adaptation to conditions that prevent the full-fledged existence of biologically immature individuals contradicted the species criteria of hominid evolution. The heuristic situation in which morphological signs of neoteny extend to the field of behavioral stereotypes of human looks fundamentally different. In this research context the hypothesis of D. Morris on the consequences of neoteny associated with nudity is critically analyzed. It is shown that in the context of the application of sociobiological research program actions that potentially targeted at members of different demographic groups are of particular interest. Based on the features of the considered paradigm a variant of the simultaneous action of two directions of biological and social evolution is proposed: the preservation of infantile traits that ensure the internal cohesion of the group while simultaneously consolidating other hierarchical differences. The general conclusion of the authors of the article is as follows. Neotenic human traits do not have an independent value as a biological constant independent of the conditions under which the process of individual and group selection took place. Evolutionary value of human neoteny was determined by a complex of acquired and inherited factors allowing us to reason about their primary or secondary, direct or indirect determination, and consequently, about the advantages of biological or sociobiological approaches.
About the authors
Yuri K. Volkov
Lobachevsky National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: yu.k.volkov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-4723-443X
DSc in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy of the Faculty of Physics
Russian Federation, 23, Gagarin Avenue, Nizhny Novgorod 603022Alexander B. Savinov
Lobachevsky National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University
Email: sabcor@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-7409-174X
CSc in Biology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Ecology of the Institute of Biology and Biomedicine
Russian Federation, 23, Gagarin Avenue, Nizhny Novgorod 603022References
- Артемова О.Ю. Личность и социальные нормы в раннепервобытной общине: По австралийским этнографическим данным. М.: Наука, 1987. // Artemova O.Yu. Lichnost’ i sotsial’nye normy v rannepervobytnoi obshchine: Po avstraliiskim etnograficheskim dannym [Personaity and Social Norms in an Early Primitive Community: According to Australian Ethnographic Data]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1987.
- Биологический энциклопедический словарь. М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1986. // Biologicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [The Biological Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1986.
- Дженкинс М. 101 ключевая идея: Эволюция / пер. с англ. О. Перфильева. М.: Фаир-Пресс, 2001. // Jenkins M. 101 klyuchevaya ideya: Evolyutsiya [101 Key Ideas: Evolution], transl. from English by O. Perfiliev. Moscow: Fair-Press Publ., 2001.
- Игнатьев В.Н. Социобиология человека. «Теория генно-культурной эволюции» // Вопросы философии. 1982. № 9. С. 134–141. // Ignatiev V.N. Sotsiobiologiya cheloveka. «Teoriya genno-kul’turnoi evolyutsii» [Human Sociobiology. “The Theory of Genetic and Cultural Evolution”]. Voprosy filosofii. 1982. N 9. P. 134–141.
- Карпинская Р.С., Никольский С.А. Социобиология: Критический анализ. М.: Мысль, 1988. // Karpinskaya R.S., Nickolsky S.A. Sotsiobiologiya: Kriticheskii analiz [Sociobiology: A Critical Analysis.]. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1988.
- Кольцов Н.К. Проблемы прогрессивной эволюции // Биологический журнал. 1933. Т. 2. Вып. 4/5. С. 475–500. // Koltsov N.K. Problemy progressivnoi evolyutsii [Problems of Progressive Evolution]. Biologicheskii zhurnal. 1933. Vol. 2, N 4/5. P. 475–500.
- Кон И.С. Введение в сексологию. М.: Медицина, 1988. // Kon I.S. Vvedenie v seksologiyu [Introduction to Sexology]. Moscow: Meditsina Publ., 1988.
- Кропоткин П.А. Этика // Кропоткин П.А. Этика: Избранные труды. М.: Политиздат, 1991. С. 22–258. // Kropotkin P.A. Etika [Ethics]. Kropotkin P.A. Etika: Izbrannye trudy [Ethics: Selected works]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 1991. P. 22–258.
- Линке С. Была ли социобиология «новым синтезом»? // Русский орнитологический журнал. 2005. Т. 14. № 282. С. 234–242. // Linke S. Byla li sotsiobiologiya «novym sintezom»? [Was Sociobiology a “New Synthesis”?]. Russkii ornitologicheskii zhurnal. 2005. Vol. 14, N 282. P. 234–242.
- Моррис Д. Голая обезьяна (сборник): пер. с англ. М.: Азбука-Аттикус, 2016. // Morris D. Golaya obez’yana (sbornik) [The Naked Ape (Collection)], transl. from English. Moscow: Azbuka-Attikus Publ., 2016.
- Никонов А. Апгрейд обезьяны. Большая история маленькой сингулярности. М.: НЦ ЭНАС, 2004. // Nikonov A. Apgreid obez'yany. Bol'shaya istoriya malen'koi singulyarnosti. [The Ape Upgrade. The Big Story of the Little Singularity]. Moscow: NTs ENAS Publ., 2004.
- Новый энциклопедический словарь. М.: Большая российская энциклопедия: Рипол Классик, 2005. // Novyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [The new Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Bol'shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya: Ripol Klassik Publ., 2005.
- Панов Е.Н. Этология человека: история и перспективы // Поведение животных и человека: сходства и различия. Пущино: ОНТИ Науч. центра биол. исслед. АН СССР, 1989. С. 28–62. // Panov E.N. Etologiya cheloveka: istoriya i perspektivy [Human Ethology: History and Prospects]. Povedenie zhivotnykh i cheloveka: skhodstva i razlichiya [Animal and Human Behavior: Similarities and Differences]. Pushchino: ONTI Scientific Center of Biol. Research. USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1989. P. 28–62.
- Плюснин Ю.М. Проблема биосоциальной эволюции: теоретико-методологический анализ. Новосибирск: Наука. Сиб. отд-ние, 1990. // Plyusnin Yu.M. Problema biosotsial’noi evolyutsii: teoretiko-metodologicheskii analiz [The problem of Biosocial Evolution: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ. Siberian Branch, 1990.
- Соколов А.В. Странная обезьяна: Куда делась шерсть и почему люди разного цвета. М.: Альпина нон-фикшн, 2020. // Sokolov A.V. Strannaya obez’yana: Kuda delas’ sherst’ i pochemu lyudi raznogo tsveta [Strange Monkey: Where Did the Wool Go and Why People of Different Colors]. Moscow: Al’pina non-fikshn Publ., 2020.
- Соловьев В.С. Оправдание добра. Нравственная философия // Соловьев В.С. Сочинения: в 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Мысль, 1990. С. 47–580. // Solovyov V.S. Opravdanie dobra. Nravstvennaya filosofiya [Justification of Goodness. Moral Philosophy]. Solovyov V.S. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Essays: in 2 vols.] Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1990. P. 47–580.
- Спенсер Г. Синтетическая философия / пер. с англ. П.В. Мокиевского. Киев: Ника-Центр, 1997. // Spenser H. Sinteticheskaya filosofiya [The Synthetic Philosophy], transl. from English by P.V. Mokievsky. Kiev: Nika-Tsentr Publ., 1997.
- Уайт Э., Браун Д. Первые люди / пер. с англ. И. Гуровой. М.: Мир, 1978. // White E., Brown D. Pervye lyudi [The First People], transl. from English by I. Gurova. Moscow: Mir Publ., 1978.
- Фромм Э. «Иметь» или «быть» / пер. с нем. Э.М. Телятниковой. М.: АСТ, 2008. // Fromm E. «Imet’» ili «byt’» [To Have or to Be?], transl. from German by E.M. Telyatnikova. Moscow: AST Publ., 2008.
- Чалидзе В. Иерархический человек: социобиологические заметки. М.: Терра, 1991. // Chalidze V. Ierarkhicheskii chelovek: sotsiobiologicheskie zametki [The Hierarchical Man: Sociobiological Notes]. Moscow: Terra Publ., 1991.
- Bednarik R.G. The human condition. New York: Springer, 2011.
- Boehm C. Impact of the human egalitarian syndrome on Darwinian selection mechanics. The American Naturalist. 1997. Vol. 150. P. 100–121. doi: 10.1086/286052
- Bogin B. Evolutionary hypotheses for human childhood. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. 1997. Vol. 40. P. 63–89.
- Bolk L. Origin of racial characteristics in man. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1929. Vol. 13, Iss. 1. P. 1–28. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330130123
- Bonett R.M., Phillips J.G., Ledbetter N.M., Martin S.D., Lehman L. Rapid phenotypic evolution following shifts in life cycle complexity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018. Vol. 285. P. 1–9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2304
- Bufill E., Agusti J., Blesa R. Human neoteny revisited: the case of synaptic plasticity. American Journal of Human Biology. 2011. Vol. 23. Р. 729–739. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21225
- Gould S.J. A biological homage to Mickey Mouse. Ecotone. 2008. Vol. 4, N 1. P. 333–340. doi: 10.1353/ect.2008.0045
- Hooper D.M., Price T.D. Chromosomal inversion differences correlate with range overlap in passerine birds. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2017. Vol. 1(10). P. 1526–1534. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0284-6
- Lovejoy C.O. Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus ramidus. Science. 2009. Vol. 326. Р. 74–82. doi: 10.1126/science.1175834
- Montagu M.A. Time, Morphology, and Neoteny in the Evolution of Man. American Anthropologist. 1955. Vol. 57. P. 13–27. doi: 10.1525/aa.1955.57.1.02a00030.
- Morris D. The Naked Ape. A Zoologist’s Study of the Human Animal. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1967.
- Rantala M.J. Evolution of nakedness in Homo sapiens. Journal of Zoology. 2007. Vol. 273, Iss.1. P. 1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00295.
- Skulachev V.P., Holtze S., Vyssokikh M.Y., Bakeeva L.E., Skulachev M.V., Markov A.V., Hildebrandt T.B., Sadovnichii V.A. Neoteny, prolongation of youth: from naked mole rats to “naked apes” (humans). Physiological Reviews. 2017. Vol. 97(2). P. 699–720. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00040.2015
- Suntsova M.V., Buzdin A.A. Differences between human and chimpanzee genomes and their implications in gene expression, protein functions and biochemical properties of the two species. BMC Genomics. 2020. Vol. 21(7). P. 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06962-8
- Uebbing S., Gockley J., Reilly S.K., Kocher A.A., Geller E., Gandotra N., Scharfe C., Cotney J., Noonan J.P. Massively parallel discovery of human-specific substitutions that alter enhancer activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2021. Vol. 118(2). P. 1–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007049118
- Verhulst J. Bolkian and bokian retardation in Homo sapiens. Acta Biotheoretica. 1999. Vol. 47. P. 7–28. doi: 10.1023/A:1002069909550
- Wilson Е.О. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, 1975.
