Consciousness and illusion: does illusionism threaten a human

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Illusionism is a relatively recent theory of consciousness that has absorbed and consistently developed physicalist intuitions about consciousness. This approach gives sufficient grounds to consider it contrary to the basic ideas of realists regarding phenomenal consciousness, because according to illusionism there is no phenomenal consciousness, it is just an illusion. The author believes that the danger of this thesis for realists depends on which concept of illusion to adhere to. After a brief review of the illusionist approach, the article presents two possible contents of the concept of the illusion of phenomenality. The author then considers whether realists cannot agree with any of them. One of the possible understandings of illusion is the conceptual distortion of the data of experience or introspection in the course of their interpretation. Although this view is not basic for illusionists, it is implicitly and sometimes explicitly contained in their examples and arguments. In this case, realists can agree that phenomenal consciousness is an illusion, not only without weakening their position, but also emphasizing the special status of phenomenality, which allows a person to expand reality when faced with what is not in the world. When an illusion is understood as a distortion by introspection itself, before any conceptual reactions to its data, the position of illusionists turns out to be much more dangerous for phenomenal consciousness. However, even in this case, realists can introduce a number of counterarguments to which illusionism does not yet have answers acceptable to both sides. Although this discussion is complicated by ambiguities in the relation of definitions of key terms of representatives of these two approaches, which complicates its analysis, the author comes to the conclusion that realism has a chance, if not to adapt the illusion, then to demonstrate the problems and gaps of the illusionist position in connection with this concept.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Maxim D. Gorbachev

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: mgorbachev@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8374-5889

Graduate student, research assistant of REL of Transcendental philosophy

Russian Federation, 21/4, Staraya Basmannaya Str., Moscow 105066

References

  1. Girenok F.I. Affekt i emotsiya: problema rasshireniya real’nosti posredstvom mnimosti [Affect and Emotion: the Problem of Expanding Reality Through Imaginary]. Chelovek. 2023. Vol. 34, N 2. P. 7–22.
  2. Frankish K. Illyuzionizm kak teoriya soznaniya, Chast’ I [Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness. Part I], transl. by M.D. Gorbachev. Voprosy Filosofii. 2022. N 3. P. 110–121.
  3. Frankish K. Illyuzionizm kak teoriya soznaniya, Chast’ II [Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness, Part II], transl. by M.D. Gorbachev. Voprosy Filosofii. 2022. N 4. P. 59–71.
  4. Balog K. Illusionism’s discontent. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23. N 11–12. P. 40–51.
  5. Blackmore S. Delusions of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 52–64.
  6. Brown C.D. Why illusionism about consciousness is unbelievable. Ratio. 2022. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 16–24.
  7. Chalmers D.J. The representational character of experience. The future for philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 153–181.
  8. Dennett D.C. A history of qualia. Topoi. 2020. Vol. 39, N 1. P. 5–12.
  9. Dennett D.C. Illusionism as the obvious default theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 65–72.
  10. Dennett D.C. Quining qualia. Consciousness in contemporary science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. P. 42–77.
  11. Dennett D.C. Welcome to strong illusionism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2019. Vol. 26, N 9–10. P. 48–58.
  12. Frankish K. Illusionism is no trick. Human Affairs. 2022. Vol. 32, N 3. P. 321–327.
  13. Frankish K. Not disillusioned: Reply to commentators. Illusionism as a theory of consciousness. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2017. P. 319–360.
  14. Frankish K. Quining diet qualia. Consciousness and Cognition. 2012. Vol. 21, N 2. P. 667–676.
  15. Garfield J.L. Illusionism and givenness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 73–82.
  16. Humphrey N. Redder than red illusionism or phenomenal surrealism? Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 116–123.
  17. Humphrey N. Soul dust: The Magic of Consciousness. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2011.
  18. Husserl E. Ding und Raum: vorlesungen 1907. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1991.
  19. Kammerer F. How rich is the illusion of consciousness? Erkenntnis. 2022. Vol. 87, N 2. P. 499–515.
  20. Kammerer F. The Hardest Aspect of the Illusion Problem — and How to Solve It. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 124–139.
  21. Kammerer F., Frankish K. What Forms Could Introspective Systems Take? A Research Programme. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2023. Vol. 30, N. 9–10. P. 13–48.
  22. Lipuš A., Bregant J. Illusionism: an Argument for Its Incoherence. Acta Analytica. 2022. Vol. 37. P. 341–352.
  23. Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? The philosophical review. 1974. Vol. 83, N 4. P. 435–450.
  24. Nida-Rümelin M. The illusion of illusionism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 160–171.
  25. Niikawa T. Illusionism and definitions of phenomenal consciousness. Philosophical Studies. 2021. Vol. 178. N 1. P. 1–21.
  26. Prinz J. Against illusionism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 186–196.
  27. Schwarz W. Imaginary foundations. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 2018. URL: https://philpapers.org/rec/SCHIF-6 (date of access: 10.06.2023).
  28. Shabasson D. Illusionism about Phenomenal Consciousness: Explaining the Illusion. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2022. Vol. 13, N 2. P. 427–453.
  29. Tartaglia J. What is at Stake in Illusionism? Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2016. Vol. 23, N 11–12. P. 236–255.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies