Problems of intercultural dialogue in modern society: finding solutions

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article presents possible grounds for intercultural dialogue. Due to the polarization of international relations and political tensions, the issue of the fundamental possibility of grounds for intercultural dialogue in modern times is being considered. The concept of intercultural dialogue is understood in the article as an integrative process based on the acceptance of cultural differences. The author argues that the use of modern sociological approaches is not always applicable as a basis for building dialogical relations, since such approaches do not reflect the cultural characteristics of individual communities. Sociological researches are often politicized, and the methods of classifying different cultural communities used in them need to be rethought. Also, sociological approaches to the interaction of different cultural communities are focused on long-term ideological work, but the existing problems show that quick and constructive solutions are needed. According to the author, other grounds for interaction between cultures and communities are required, more general and applicable at the current stage on a global transnational scale. The author identifies two main starting points for intercultural dialogue: scientific and environmental cooperation and economic cooperation. Each of these paths has ample opportunities in the modern world for implementation in the field of the global economy or in the field of scientific cooperation and environmental protection. On the basis of transnational economic cooperation, it is possible to find an economic consensus between states which often represents different cultural systems. International scientific and environmental elaborations also serve as a basis for constructive interaction in front of common environmental problems or by qualitatively new scientific developments. The two paths presented are points for formal interaction, which can further be an entry point of an integrative cultural dialogue.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Daria A. Sheveleva

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dsheveleva@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-8873-3334

СSc in Philosophy, Visiting Lecturer

Russian Federation, 16, Soyuza Pechatnikov Str., Saint-Petersburg 190121

References

  1. Arshba O.I., Tatunts S.A. Osobennosti pravogo radikalizma v evropeiskikh stranakh [Features of Right-Wing Radicalism in European Countries]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. 2013. N 4(84). P. 98–101.
  2. Baum G. Spasti prava grazhdan. Svoboda ili bezopasnost’. Polemicheskie zametki [Save Citizen’s Rights: Freedom or Security], transl. from English. Moscow: Sektor Publ., 2015.
  3. Vankhanen T. Etnicheskie konflikty: ikh biologicheskie konflikty v etnicheskom favoritizme [Ethnic Conflicts: Their Biological roots in Ethnic Nepotism], transl. from English by D.O. Rumyantsev, introd. art. V.B. Avdeeva. M.: Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2014.
  4. Giddens E. Nespokoinyi i mogushchestvennyi kontinent. Chto zhdet Evropu v budushchem [Turbulent and Mighty Continent. What Future for Europe?], transl. from English by A. Matveenko, M. Bendet. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom “Delo” RANKhiGS Publ., 2015.
  5. Darendorf R. Sovremennyi sotsial'nyi konflikt. Ocherk politiki svobody [The Modern Social Conflict. An Essay on the Politics of Freedom], transl. from German by L.Yu. Pantina. Moscow: Rosspen Publ., 2002.
  6. Kagan F.I. Mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya i sotsiokul’turnaya missiya turizma: vyzovy i otvety [Intercultural Communication and Socio-cultural Mission of Tourism: Challenges and Answers]. Turizm i gostepriimstvo bez granits: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya: sb. st. po itogam Mezhdunar. nauch-prakt. konf., 31 maya-2 iyunya 2013 g. [Tourism and Hospitality Without Borders: Trends and Prospects of Development: Collection of Articles on the Results of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, May 31–June 2, 2013]. Ivanovo: Ivan. gos. un-t Publ., 2013.
  7. Kozer L. Funktsii sotsial’nogo konflikta [The Functions of Social Conflict], transl. from English. Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noi knigi Publ., 2000.
  8. Malabaev S. Izmeneniya istoricheskoi pamyati kak odna iz prichin razvitiya ksenofobii i ekstremizma v Kyrgyzstane [Changes in Historical Memory as one of the Reasons for the Development of Xenophobia and Extremism in Kyrgyzstan]. Ksenofobiya i ekstremizm: global’nye vyzovy i regional’nye trendy: Sbornik dokladov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi onlain-konferentsii, Moskva, 26 oktyabrya 2021 goda [Xenophobia and Extremism: Global Challenges and Regional Trends: Collection of Reports of the International Scientific Online Conference, Moscow, October 26, 2021]. Moscow: Izdatel’sko-torgovaya korporatsiya “Dashkov i K” Publ., 2022.
  9. Maleko E.V. Kontrkul’tura skinkhedov v kontekste problemy ekstremizma v Rossii [Skinhead Counterculture in the Context of the Problem of Extremism in Russia]. 2020. Ekonomika i politika. N 1(15). P. 46–49.
  10. Mironov V.V. Dobrodetel’nyi terror, ili Kto opredelyaet granitsy svobody slova (razmyshlyaya nad knigami Tilo Sarratsina) [Virtuous Terror, or who Defines the Boundaries of Freedom of Speech (Reflecting on the Books of Tilo Sarrazin)]. Eticheskaya mysl'. 2018. T. 18, N 2. S. 99–115. doi: 10.21146/2074-4870-2018-18-2-99-115
  11. Sarratsin T. Germaniya. Samolikvidatsiya [Germany Abolishes Itsel], transl. from German by T.A. Nabatnikova. Moscow: Rid Grupp Publ., 2012.
  12. Soliev B.Kh. Vzaimootnoshenie sovremennogo politicheskogo islama s protsessami globalizatsii i modernizatsii [The Relationship of Modern Political Islam with the Processes of Globalization and Modernization]. Vestnik Pedagogicheskogo universiteta (Tadzhikskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet imeni S. Aini). 2014. N 3–1(58). P. 10–17.
  13. Trofimov E.A. Migratsionnye protsessy na postsovetskom prostranstve v XXI veke [Migration Processes in the Post-Soviet space in the XXI century]. Izvestiya Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. T. 30, N 1. P. 23–29. doi: 10.17150/2500-2759.2020.30(1).23-29
  14. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii [Clash of Civilizations], transl. from English. Moscow: AST Publ., 2003.
  15. Al-Jayyousi O.R. Islam and Sustainable Development: New Worldviews. Gower Publishing, 2012. ISBN 9781409456490.
  16. Aguilar L.M.H. Islamophobia in Germany, still a debate?: D’Haenens L., Mekki-Berrada A. (eds.), Islamophobia as a Form of Radicalisation: Perspectives on Media, Academia and Socio-political Scapes from Europe and Canada. Leuven University Press, 2023. P. 75–88. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv34h08d2.7
  17. Claviez T. The conditions of hospitality: Ethics, politics, and aesthetics on the threshold of the possible. Fordham University Press, 2013. ISBN 0823251489
  18. Dzikevich D. The Ecological Turn: Constructive Postmodernism and Construction of Ecological Civilization in China. Process Studies. 2021. Vol. 50. Iss. 2. P. 255–269. doi: 10.5840/process202150214
  19. Ferreira D. Research on Big Data, VGI, and the Tourism and Hospitality Sector: Concepts, Methods, and Geographies: Managerial Approaches, Techniques, and Applications: Big Data and Innovation in Tourism, Travel, and Hospitality. Springer, 2019. P. 75–85. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6339-9_5
  20. Galtung J. Introduction: peace by peaceful conflict transformation – the TRANSCEND approach: Webel C., Galtung J. (eds.) Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. Routledge, 2009. P. 14–34.
  21. Galtung J. Language and war: is there a connection? Current Research on Peace and Violence. Vol. 10, N 1. War, Peace & Culture. 1987. P. 2–6.
  22. Gerhart B., Fang M. National Culture and Human Resource Management: Assumptions and Evidence. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2007. V.16. I. 6. P. 971–986. doi: 10.1080/09585190500120772
  23. Guha R. How Much Should a Person Consume? Thinking Through the Environment. Berkeley. Oxford University Press (OUP): University of California Press, 2006. ISBN 978-93-5009-259-0.
  24. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: International differences in work related values. London and Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, 1980.
  25. Igosheva M.A., Paliy I.G., Krolman M.L., Takhtamyshev V.G., Kasyanov V.V. Ethnic Identity as a Cultural Safety Resource of Local Communities in the Context of Globalization. Journal of History, Culture & Art Research. Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Arastirmalari Dergisi. 2019. Vol. 8. Iss. 3. P. 277–284. doi: 10.7596/taksad.v8i3.2249
  26. Farzana K.F. State and violence in Burma/Myanmar: The Rohingya crisis and its implication for South and South-East Asia: Minoru Mio, Kazuya Nakamizo and Tatsuro Fujikura (eds.) The Dynamics of Conlict and Peace in Contemporary South Asia, 2021. P. 55–73.
  27. Korstanje M.E. Terrorism, Tourism and the End of Hospitality in the ‘West’. Basingstoke, United Kingdom and New York, United States: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2016.
  28. Machtans K. “Racism Is Not an Opinion” Muslim Responses to Pegida and Islamophobia in Germany. German Politics & Society. 2016. 34(4). P. 87–100.
  29. Marquard O. Filosofía de la compensacíon. Estudios sobre anthropología filosofíca. tr. de Tafalla M. Barcelona, Buenos Aires, Mexico: PAIDÓS, 2001.
  30. McSweeney B. Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith – a Failure of Analysis. Human Relations. 2002. Vol. 55 (1). P. 89–118. doi: 10.1177/0018726702551004
  31. Panin A.N., Tikunov V.S. Ethnic “Barometer”: ethno-demographic and ethnomigration processes in the north Caucasus. Journal of the Geographical Institute ‘Jovan Cvijić’ SASA. 2015. Vol. 65. Iss. 1. P. 77–89. doi: 10.2298/IJGI1501077P
  32. Reckwitz A. The society of singularities. Tr. by Valentine A. Pakis. Cambridge, United Kingdom and Medford, United States: Polity Press, 2020.
  33. Smith V.L. Eskimo Tourism: Micro-Models and Marginal Men. Valene L. Smith (ed.) Hosts and guests. Anthropology of tourism. Second edition. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989. P. 55–82.
  34. Stanciu L., Stanciu C.-L. Glocalization – an objective condition for a successful management of the multinational companies in the context of the economic globalization. Revista Academiei Fortelor Terestre. 2021. Vol. 26. Iss. 3. P. 233–242. doi: 10.2478/raft-2021-0030
  35. Wang Z., He H., Fan M. The Ecological Civilization Debate in China: The Role of Ecological Marxism and Constructive Postmodernism – Beyond the Predicament of Legislation. Monthly Review. 2014. Vol. 66. doi: 10.14452/MR-066-06-2014-10_3

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies