National culture as a historical and psychological phenomenon (Using the example of the attitude of the Russian population towards the Soviet Union)
- Autores: Kitova D.A.1, Khanova Z.G.2, Aprelikova N.R.3
-
Afiliações:
- Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Non-governmental educational private institution of higher education Moscow Financial and Industrial University “Synergy”
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Russian University of Sport “GTsOLIFK”
- Edição: Volume 46, Nº 5 (2025)
- Páginas: 32-42
- Seção: Social psychology
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0205-9592/article/view/353311
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959225050041
- ID: 353311
Citar
Resumo
The study established the psychological characteristics of the attitude of social network users towards the USSR. It was found that, when speaking about the USSR, users most often discuss the reasons for its collapse (economic, political, social), the distribution of state debt obligations, the legal successors of material resources, and relations between its former republics. Criticism of the economic system of the USSR is shown, which users associate with both modern economic achievements of Russia (nuclear, space and military industries) and with acute problems (the absence of its own technological, industrial and production sites in certain areas). A high assessment of the achievements of Soviet science and art is also presented, with cinema and cartoons being particularly emotionally assessed. Additional provisions include unanimity in the negative assessment of the state’s attitude to religion and the filling of Soviet textbooks with ideological dogmas. This nature of the “legacy” causes a contradictory attitude towards the USSR, which is primarily due to the political system and economy that suppressed the private property interests of the population. From a psychological point of view, the main positions of the state structure – the system of governance, quality of life, economy, ideology, reasons for the collapse, etc. – are assessed extremely emotionally and differently; such discussions often turn into debates, and sometimes opinions are expressed that directly contradict each other. If we talk specifically about the “almost unanimous assessment” of that period, then four leading positions stand out: the USSR as a state ceased to exist at the end of 1991; Russia is the sole legal successor of the USSR in terms of international debts and nuclear weapons; the USSR, along with the USA, was one of the two world superpowers that influenced the development of international relations and processes; the USSR actively participated in military conflicts and possessed significant military power. In general, the attitude towards the USSR can be defined as moderately negative.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
D. Kitova
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: j-kitova@yandex.ru
129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya St., 13, bld. 1, Russia
Z. Khanova
Non-governmental educational private institution of higher education Moscow Financial and Industrial University “Synergy”
Email: khanova309@yandex.ru
129090, Moscow, Meshchanskaya St., 9/14, bld. 1, Russia
N. Aprelikova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Russian University of Sport “GTsOLIFK”
Email: aprelikovanr@mail.ru
105122, Moscow, Sirenevy Boulevard, 4, bld. 1, Russia
Bibliografia
- Журавлев А.Л., Китова Д.А. Способности и эффективность государственного управления (на историческом примере Петра I) // Способности и ментальные ресурсы человека в мире глобальных перемен. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2020. С. 202–213.
- Журавлев А.Л., Китова Д.А. Автоматизированный психологический анализ исторических текстов: тенденции и перспективы // Наука как общественное благо: сборник научных статей Второго Международного Конгресса Русского общества истории и философии науки. Т. 2. М.: Межрегиональная общественная организация “Русское общество истории и философии науки”, 2020. С. 98–103.
- Журавлев А.Л., Китова Д.А. Экономический менталитет россиян в контексте психолого-исторического анализа // Психологический журнал. 2023. Т. 44. № 5. С. 25–36.
- И вновь на перепутье? Постсоветским трансформациям 30 лет... / М.К. Горшков, Г.А. Тосунян, А.В. Смирнов и др. М.: Новые печатные технологии, 2019.
- Историческая психология: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2020.
- Китова Д.А. Экономический менталитет россиян в связи с характеристикой советского периода развития // Советская психология: этап истории науки и менталитет: сборник статей. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2024. С. 673–697.
- Китова Д.А., Журавлев А.Л. Экономический менталитет россиян в связи с характеристикой советского периода развития // Советская психология: этап истории науки и менталитет (Методология, теория и история психологии): сборник статей. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2024.
- Кольцова В.А., Журавлев А.Л. Сущностные характеристики и факторы формирования российского менталитета // Психологический журнал. 2017. Т. 38. № 3. С. 5–17.
- Кольцова В.А., Журавлев А.Л. Историческая психология: предмет, структура и методы. М.: Московский гуманитарный университет, 2004.
- Королев А.А., Кольцова В.А., Журавлев А.Л. История и психология: неумолчный диалог: учеб. пособие. М.: Московский гуманитарный университет, 2011.
- Психологические исследования в интернет-пространстве: поисковые системы, социальные сети, электронные базы. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2020.
- Семенова Ф.О., Китова Д.А. Феномен сознания как предмет психологического анализа // Вестник Университета Российской академии образования. 2019. № 4. С. 49–54.
- Zhuravlev A.L., Kitova D.A. Sposobnosti i effektivnost’ gosudarstvennogo upravleniya (na istoricheskom primere Petra I). Sposobnosti i mental’nye resursy cheloveka v mire global’nyh peremen. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2020. P. 202–213. (In Russian)
- Zhuravlev A.L., Kitova D.A. Avtomatizirovannyj psihologicheskij analiz istoricheskih tekstov: tendencii i perspektivy. Nauka kak obshchestvennoe blago: sbornik nauchnyh statej Vtorogo Mezhdunarodnogo Kongressa Russkogo obshchestva istorii i filosofii nauki. V. 2. Moscow: Mezhregional’naya obshchestvennaya organizaciya “Russkoe obshchestvo istorii i filosofii nauki”, 2020. P. 98–103. (In Russian)
- Zhuravlev A.L., Kitova D.A. Ekonomicheskij mentalitet rossiyan v kontekste psihologo-istoricheskogo analiza. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2023. V. 44. № 5. P. 25–36.
- I vnov’ na pereput’e? Postsovetskim transformaciyam 30 let... M.K. Gorshkov, G.A. Tosunyan, A.V. Smirnov et al. Moscow: Novye pechatnye tekhnologii, 2019. (In Russian)
- Istoricheskaya psihologiya: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. Mosow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2020. (In Russian)
- Kitova D.A. Ekonomicheskij mentalitet rossiyan v svyazi s harakteristikoj sovetskogo perioda razvitiya. Sovetskaya psihologiya: etap istorii nauki i mentalitet. Sbornik statej. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2024. P. 673–697. (In Russian)
- Kitova D.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Ekonomicheskij mentalitet rossiyan v svyazi s harakteristikoj sovetskogo perioda razvitiyaю Sovetskaya psihologiya: etap istorii nauki i mentalitet (Metodologiya, teoriya i istoriya psihologii): Sbornik statej. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2024. (In Russian)
- Kol’cova V.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Sushchnostnye harakteristiki i faktory formirovaniya rossijskogo mentaliteta. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 3. P. 5–17. (In Russian)
- Kol’cova V.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Istoricheskaya psihologiya: predmet, struktura i metody. M.: Moskovskij gumanitarnyj universitet, 2004. (In Russian)
- Korolev A.A., Kol’cova V.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Istoriya i psihologiya: neumolchnyj dialog: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: Moskovskij gumanitarnyj universitet, 2011. (In Russian)
- Psihologicheskie issledovaniya v internet-prostranstve: poiskovye sistemy, social’nye seti, elektronnye bazy. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2020. (In Russian)
- Semenova F.O., Kitova D.A. Fenomen soznaniya kak predmet psihologicheskogo analiza. Vestnik Universiteta Rossijskoj akademii obrazovaniya. 2019. № 4. P. 49–54. (In Russian)
Arquivos suplementares

