The role of using eyetracking technology in psychodiagnostics: systematic review
- Authors: Shagina E.D.1, Matveicheva S.A.1, Nekhaeva Y.V.1, Lukina S.E.1, Shakhov M.V.1, Kondratiev I.E.1, Shishkin A.A.1, Demin N.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 46, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 95-107
- Section: Methodes and procedures
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0205-9592/article/view/287768
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959225010109
- ID: 287768
Cite item
Abstract
The use of the eye movement registration and gaze fixation system — eytracing (eytracing — TA technology) as a means of psychodiagnostics is a new and very promising diagnostic technique. It allows for a deeper understanding of cognitive processes, emotional reactions and behavioral characteristics, which opens up new opportunities in the diagnosis and study of mental states at an interdisciplinary level. The purpose of the study is to assess the state and possibilities of using psychodiagnostic TA within the framework of a systematic analysis of scientific data. Materials and methods. The literature was searched in electronic databases of scientific data PubMed.gov, Elsevier.com, Google Scholar.com, Elibrary.ru. The analysis of the data obtained focused on works published between 2014 and 2024. Results. After the audit procedures of 549 works for duplication and compliance criteria, 31 studies were selected. Of these, 15 (46.9%) are devoted to evaluating the use of TA in clinical psychology, 10 (31.2%) — cognitive psychology and 7 (21.9%) — social psychology. At the same time, in most cases, the work was aimed at diagnostic optimization of TA — 15 (46.9%), in 14 (43.8%) it had the character of a scientific justification for the expediency of using TA in the framework of psychodiagnostics, and in 3 (9.4%) it provided data on the validity of TA as a psychodiagnostic tool. Conclusions. The analysis of scientific data revealed that despite the relative novelty of TA as a psychodiagnostic tool, the most popular areas have been identified that focus on the assessment of autism spectrum disorders, cognitive function and neuropsychic profile. However, despite the prevailing popularity of the study of TA as a psychodiagnostic tool, to date the world scientific community has not been able to formulate a standard or create a unified protocol for the use of this technology for the assessment of psychopathological conditions.
About the authors
E. D. Shagina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: shaginenok@gmail.com
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, Head of the Laboratory of Practical Skills, Assistant of the Department of Clinical Psychology
Russian Federation, 125047, Moscow, 1st Miusskaya str., 22/24, bldn. 2S. A. Matveicheva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: markshakhov03@yandex.ru
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, Student
Russian Federation, 125047, Moscow, 1st Miusskaya str., 22/24, bldn. 2Yu. V. Nekhaeva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: markshakhov03@yandex.ru
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, Student
Russian Federation, 125047, Moscow, 1st Miusskaya str., 22/24, bldn. 2S. E. Lukina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: markshakhov03@yandex.ru
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, Student
Russian Federation, 125047, Moscow, 1st Miusskaya str., 22/24, bldn. 2M. V. Shakhov
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: markshakhov03@yandex.ru
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, Student
Russian Federation, 125047, Moscow, 1st Miusskaya str., 22/24, bldn. 2I. E. Kondratiev
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: markshakhov03@yandex.ru
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, Student
Russian Federation, 125047, Moscow, 1st Miusskaya str., 22/24, bldn. 2A. A. Shishkin
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: doc.shishkin@mail.ru
Z.P. Solovyov Institute of Preventive Medicine, Candidate of Medical Sciences, researcher at the Laboratory of the Latest technologies of health-improving motor activity
Russian Federation, 129110, Moscow, Panteleevskaya str., 10N. A. Demin
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Email: deminnic1@gmail.com
Z.P. Solovyov Institute of Preventive Medicine, Junior researcher at the Laboratory of the Latest technologies of recreational motor activity
Russian Federation, 129110, Moscow, Panteleevskaya str., 10References
- Bessonova Ju.V., Oboznov A.A. Ajtreking v diagnostike pravdy–lzhi. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaja psihologija i psihologija truda. 2019. V. 4. № 1. P. 46–86. (In Russian)
- Bojko V.V. Pravila jemocional’nogo povedenija. Saint Petersburg. 1998. 88 p. (In Russian)
- Zotova N.E., Zotov M.V., Korotkova I.C. Neproizvol’naja integracija rezul’tatov perceptivnoj aktivnosti drugogo individa v sobstvennuju perceptivnuju aktivnost’. Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija. 2022. V. 18. № 2. P. 73–81. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180208 (In Russian)
- Kajdalova D.A., Kuznecova A.A., Nikitina E.A. Osobennosti glazodvigatel’nyh reakcij pri vosprijatii statichnyh izobrazhenij u junoshej i devushek so sklonnost’ju k igrovoj komp’juternoj zavisimosti. Izvestija Jugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: lingvistika i pedagogika. 2023. V. 13. № 4. P. 164–175. https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-151X-2023-13-4-164-175 (In Russian)
- Lihacheva Je.V., Nikolaeva L.P., Ognev A.S. et al. Okulograficheskie pokazateli preobladanija pozitivnyh ili negativnyh jemocional’nyh sostojanij. Chelovecheskij kapital. 2020. № 9(141). P. 188–199. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2020.09.17. EDN KVKPSV (In Russian)
- Ognev A.S., Lihacheva Je.V., Nikolaeva L.P. et al. Vozmozhnosti ispol’zovanija izobrazhenij pesochnyh kompozicij v okulometricheskoj diagnostike psihologicheskih osobennostej lichnosti. Chelovecheskij kapital. 2022. № 6(162). P. 91–95. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2022.06.11. EDN WMJBBM (In Russian)
- Pochinkova P.A., Gorbatova M.A., Narkevich A.N. et al. Obnovlennye kratkie rekomendacii po podgotovke i predstavleniju sistematicheskih obzorov: chto novogo v PRISMA-2020? Morskaja medicina. 2022. V. 8. № 2. P. 88–101. https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2022-8-2-88-101 (In Russian)
- Prirodova O.F., Lazarenko V.A., Nikishina V.B. et al. Ocenka ustanovochnogo komponenta kognitivnoj zadachi po strukturno-dinamicheskim harakteristikam dvizhenija glaz prepodavatelja vuza. Medicinskoe obrazovanie i professional’noe razvitie. 2019. V. 10. № 1. P. 73–83. https://doi.org/10.24411/2220-8453-2019-11008 (In Russian)
- Sagalakova O.A., Truevcev D.V., Zhirnova O.V. et al. Jeffekt social’noj trevogi i styda v razvitii golosov: metakognitivnaja obrabotka neblagoprijatnogo opyta otnoshenij i bditel’nost’ k social’nym ugrozam. Klinicheskaja i special’naja psihologija. 2023. V. 12. № 2. P. 25–53. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2023120202 (In Russian)
- Sapronov F.A., Makarov I.M., Gorbunova E.S. Kategorizacija v gibridnom poiske: issledovanie s ispol’zovaniem registracii dvizhenij glaz. Jeksperimental’naja psihologija. 2023. V. 16. № 3. P. 121–138. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2023160308 (In Russian)
- Solov’eva V.A., Venig S.B., Belyh T.V. Analiz okulomotornoj aktivnosti, nabljudaemoj pri izuchenii obrazovatel’nogo materiala s jekrana. Integracija obrazovanija. 2021. V. 25. № 1. P. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.102.025.202101.091-109 (In Russian)
- Jaroshenko E.I. Primenenie tehnologii ajtrekinga dlja vyjavlenija social’no-psihologicheskih osobennostej jemocional’nogo vygoranija lichnosti. Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2019. № 9(1). P. 96–115. (In Russian)
- Ahmed I.A., Senan E.M., Rassem T.H. et al. Eye tracking-based diagnosis and early detection of autism spectrum disorder using machine learning and deep learning techniques. Electronics. 2022. № 11(4). Art. 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040530
- Alblas M.C., Mollen S., Fransen M.L. et al. Food at first sight: Visual attention to palatable food cues on TV and subsequent unhealthy food intake in unsuccessful restrained eaters. Appetite. 2020. № 147. Art. 104574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104574
- Armstrong T., Olatunji B.O. Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012. V. 32. № 8. P. 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004
- Baker R.S., Fields H.W Jr., Beck F.M. et al. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. № 153(4). P. 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.016
- Baron M., Hunfalvay M. Eye tracking technology detects traumatic brain injury with sensitivity and specificity. Practical Neurology. 2023. https://practicalneurology.com/news/eye-tracking-technology-detects-traumatic-brain-injury-with-sensitivity-and-specificity
- Brunet M., Taddei A., Py J. et al. Social contact, own-group recognition bias and visual attention to faces. Br J Psychol. 2023. V. 114 № 1. P. 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12603
- Brunyé T.T., Drew T., Weaver D.L. et al. A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation. Cogn. Research. 2019. № 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0159-2
- Cain M.S., Adamo S.H., Mitroff S.R. A taxonomy of errors in multiple-target visual search. Visual Cognition. 2013. № 21. P. 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.843627
- Cipresso P., Mauri M., Semonella M. et al. Looking at one’s self through Facebook increases mental stress: a computational psychometric analysis by using Eye-Tracking and psychophysiology. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019. № 22(5). P. 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0602
- Di Stasi L.L., Díaz-Piedra C., Ruiz-Rabelo J.F. et al. Quantifying the cognitive cost of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgeries: Gaze-based indices. Appl Ergon. 2017. № 65. P. 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.008
- Jenner L.A., Farran E.K., Welham A. et al. The use of eye-tracking technology as a tool to evaluate social cognition in people with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurodev Disord. 2023. № 15(1). Art. 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-023-09506-9
- Jones W., Klin A. Eye-tracking device predicts expert autism diagnoses. HCP Live. 2023. https://www.hcplive.com/view/eye-tracking-device-predicts-expert-autism-diagnoses
- Kerr-Gaffney J., Jones E., Mason L. et al. Social attention in anorexia nervosa and autism spectrum disorder: Role of social motivation. Autism. 2022. № 26(7). P. 1641–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211060593
- Koutsogiorgi C.C., Michaelides M.P. Response tendencies due to item wording using eye-tracking methodology accounting for individual differences and item characteristics. Behav Res Methods. 2022. № 54(5). P. 2252–2270. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01719-x
- Kovesdi C., Spielman Z., LeBlanc K. et al. Application of eye tracking for measurement and evaluation in human factors studies in control room modernization. Nuclear Technology. 2018. № 202(2–3). P. 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1455461
- Lee J.E., Kim S.H., Shin S.K. et al. Attentional engagement for pain-related information among individuals with chronic pain: the role of pain catastrophizing. Pain Res Manag. 2018. Art. 6038406. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6038406
- Lee M., Nayar K., Maltman N. et al. Understanding social communication differences in autism spectrum disorder and first-degree relatives: a study of looking and speaking. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020. № 50(6). P. 2128–2141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03969-3
- Lev A., Braw Y., Elbaum T. et al. Eye tracking during a continuous performance test: utility for assessing adhd patients. J Atten Disord. 2022. № 26(2). P. 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720972786
- Li N., Yang X., Du W. et al. Exploratory research on key technology of human-computer interactive 2.5-minute fast digital early warning for mild cognitive impairment. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022. Art. 2495330. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2495330
- Lim J.Z., Mountstephens J., Teo J. Emotion recognition using eye-tracking: taxonomy, review and current challenges. Sensors (Basel). 2020. № 20(8). Art. 2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082384
- Liu Q., Yang X., Chen Z., et al. Using synchronized eye movements to assess attentional engagement. Psychol Res. 2023. № 87(7). P. 2039–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01791-2
- MacNeill L.A., Fu X., Buss K.A. et al. Do you see what I mean?: Using mobile eye tracking to capture parent-child dynamics in the context of anxiety risk. Dev Psychopathol. 2022. № 34(3). P. 997–1012. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420001601
- Malsert J., Palama A., Gentaz E. Emotional facial perception development in 7, 9 and 11 year-old children: The emergence of a silent eye-tracked emotional other-race effect. PLoS One. 2020. № 15(5). Art. e0233008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233008
- Matsuda Y., Fedotov D., Takahashi Y. et al. EmoTour: Estimating emotion and satisfaction of users based on behavioral cues and audiovisual data. Sensors (Basel). 2018. № 18(11). Art. 3978. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113978
- Metternich B., Gehrer N.A., Wagner K. et al. Eye-movement patterns during emotion recognition in focal epilepsy: An exploratory investigation. Seizure. 2022. № 100. P. 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2022.06.018
- Nayar K., Gordon P.C., Martin G.E. et al. Links between looking and speaking in autism and first-degree relatives: insights into the expression of genetic liability to autism. Mol Autism. 2018. V. 9. № 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0233-5
- Nayar K., Kang X., Xing J. et al. A cross-cultural study showing deficits in gaze-language coordination during rapid automatized naming among individuals with ASD. Sci Rep. 2021. № 11(1). Art. 13401. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91911-y
- Noyes B., Biorac A., Vazquez G. et al. Eye-tracking in adult depression: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023. № 13(6). Art. e069256. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069256
- Ognev A.S., Likhacheva E.V., Nikolaeva L.P. Oculographic manifestations of situative installations, cognitive schemes and life scenarios as different components of character. Human capital. 2020. V. 141. № 9. P. 200–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2020.09.18
- Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021. V. 372. № 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Penedo T., Polastri P.F., Rodrigues S.T. et al. Influence of obstacle color on locomotor and gaze behaviors during obstacle avoidance in people with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res. 2018. № 236(12). P. 3319–3325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5385-1
- Putra P.U., Shima K., Alvarez S.A. et al. Identifying autism spectrum disorder symptoms using response and gaze behavior during the Go/NoGo game CatChicken. Sci Rep. 2021. № 11(1). Art. 22012. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01050-7
- Samadani U., Spinner R.J., Dynkowski G. et al. Eye tracking for classification of concussion in adults and pediatrics. Front. Neurol. 2022. V. 13. Art. 1039955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1039955
- Tahri Sqalli M., Aslonov B., Gafurov M. et al. Eye tracking technology in medical practice: a perspective on its diverse applications. Front Med Technol. 2023 № 5. Art. 1253001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1253001
- Tokarskaya L.V., Kotyusov A.I. Diagnostic tools for children with severe multiple developmental disorders: eye-tracking and electroencephalogram approaches. Lurian Journal. 2021. № 2(3). P. 45–61. https://doi.org/10.15826/Lurian.2021.2.3.5
- Tomer E., Lupu T., Golan L. et al. Eye tracking as a mean to detect feigned cognitive impairment in the word memory test. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2020. № 27(1). P. 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2018.1480483
- Wegner-Clemens K., Rennig J, Beauchamp M.S. A relationship between Autism-Spectrum Quotient and face viewing behavior in 98 participants. PLoS One. 2020. № 15(4). Art. e0230866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230866
- Wolf A., Tripanpitak K., Umeda S. et al. Eye-tracking paradigms for the assessment of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2023. № 14. Art. 1197567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197567
- Zhu L., Lv J. Review of studies on user research based on EEG and eye tracking. Applied Sciences. 2023. № 13(11). Art. 6502. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116502
Supplementary files
