Student`s digital literacy questionnaire
- Authors: Maklasova E.V.1, Zharkova A.P.1, Rodionov G.J.1
-
Affiliations:
- HSE University
- Issue: Vol 46, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 84-94
- Section: Methodes and procedures
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0205-9592/article/view/287767
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959225010098
- ID: 287767
Cite item
Abstract
The evolution and widespread use of digital technologies in our lives led to the usual social practice transformation and creation of their digital equivalents across the world. This was followed by the digital transformation of education. One way to assess the effectiveness of these changes is to assess the digital literacy of the subjects in the educational process. Digital literacy is one of the main factors in successful involvement in online learning. Different studies are focusing on different aspects of digital literacy, so there are a lot of different definitions and ways to figure out its structure. The purpose of the article is to combine existing ideas about students’ digital literacy and to test a psychological methodology for its assessment. The methodology included 19 items to evaluate four groups of digital literacy skills — data analysis skills, information management skills, digital equipment setup skills, and software skills. At the time of the socio-psychological survey, 100% of respondents were studying remotely using digital technologies. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 500; 69% women; M = 28 yrs., SD = 10 yrs.) results showed that the four-factor structure explains more (53%) than the two- (43%) and one- factor (34%) structures. This is in line with the theoretical model that the methodology is based on, and there are high signs of internal consistency (above 0.7). The correlation analysis (n = 103; 64% women; M = 21 yrs., SD = 4 yrs.) revealed that all components of digital literacy are positively related to a person’s social capital. This is in line with what other studies have found. Therefore, it is recommended to use a four-factor framework for assessing the student’s digital literacy.
About the authors
E. V. Maklasova
HSE University
Author for correspondence.
Email: emaklasova@hse.ru
PhD (Psychology), research fellow at the Center for Socio-Cultural Research; Lecturer at the Psychology Department of the Faculty of Social Sciences
Russian Federation, 101000, Moscow, 20 Myasnitskaya Str.A. P. Zharkova
HSE University
Email: apzharkova@edu.hse.ru
Master’s program student “Applied Social Psychology”
Russian Federation, 101000, Moscow, 20 Myasnitskaya Str.G. J. Rodionov
HSE University
Email: grodionov@hse.ru
PhD (Psychology), junior research fellow at the Center for Socio-Cultural Research; Lecturer at the Psychology Department of the Faculty of Social Sciences
Russian Federation, 101000, Moscow, 20 Myasnitskaya Str.References
- Abdrahmanova G.I., Byhovskij K.B., Veselitskaja N.N., Vishnevskij K.O., Gohberg L.M., Grebenjuk A.Ju., Dranev Ju.Ja, Zinina T.S., Maksimenko D.D., Nazarenko A.A., Proskurjakova L.N., Privorotskaja S.G., Rudnik P.B., Suslov A.B., Tarasova N.N., Turovec Ju.V., Utjatina K.E., Shparova P.O. Cifrovaja transformacija otraslej: startovye uslovija i prioritety: dokl. k XXII Apr. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. po problemam razvitija jekonomiki i obshhestva. Eds. L.M. Gohberg, P.B. Rudnik, K.O. Vishnevskij, T.S. Zinina. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 2021. (In Russian)
- Amirova R.I. Cifrovaja gramotnost’ kak faktor razvitija social’nogo kapitala. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2023. № 5–1(99), P. 15–21. (In Russian)
- Guzhavina T.A. Novye cifrovye praktiki kak vneshnij jeffekt social’nogo kapitala. Gosudarstvo, grazhdanskoe obshhestvo i stabil’nost’. 2021. № 4. P. 95–109. (In Russian)
- Zhalagina T.A. Tehnologicheskie innovacii v processe razvitija sociuma: ot pljusov i minusov k konsensusu. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. V. 42. № 2 P. 122–126. (In Russian)
- Kozhevnikova O.V., Hotinec V.Ju. Sub’ekt dejatel’nosti v uslovijah perehoda k cifrovomu miru (po materialam Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Aktual’nye problemy prakticheskoj i prikladnoj psihologii v sovremennoj sociokul’turnoj situacii”). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. V. 42. №2. P. 131–134. (In Russian)
- Ministry of Education of Russian Federation. Nacional’nyj proekt “Obrazovanie”. https://edu.gov.ru/national-project/about/ (data obrashhenija: 01.04.2023). (In Russian)
- Shugal’ H.B., Bondarenko N.V., Varlamova T.A., Volkova G.L., Shkaleva E.V., Shmatko N.A. Cifrovaja sreda v obrazovatel’nyh organizacijah razlichnyh urovnej: analiticheskij doklad. Nac. issled. un-t “Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki”. Moscow: NIU VShJe. 2023. P. 1–164. (In Russian)
- Aviram A., Eshet-Alkalai Y. Towards a Theory of Digital Literacy: Three Scenarios for the Next Steps. The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 2006.
- Eshet-Alkalai Y. Thinking in the Digital Era: A Revised Model for Digital Literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology. 2012. № 9. P. 267–276.
- Eurostat. Glossary: Digital Skills. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Digital_skills (date of request: 30.09.2023).
- Gilster P. Digital Literacy. NY: Wiley Computer Pub, 1997.
- Jones-Kavalier B.R., Flannigan S.L. Connecting the Digital Dots: Literacy of the 21st Century. Educause Quarterly. 2006. № 29. P. 8–10.
- Merchant G. Writing the future in the digital ageю Literacy. 2007. № 41. P. 118–128.
- Ng W. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput. Educ. 2021. № 59. P. 1065–1078.
- Peng L. Online teaching and learning in higher education during COVID-19: International perspectives and experiencesю The Social Science Journal. 2023. V. 60. № 4. P. 898–900.
- Selwyn N. Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education. 2016. № 21. P. 1006–1021.
- Spires H.A., Bartlett M.E. Digital Literacies and Learning: Designing a Path Forward. Friday Institute White Paper Series. 2012.
- Su Y. Delving into EFL teachers’ digital literacy and professional identity in the pandemic era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Heliyon. 2023. № 9. P. 1–7.
- van Deursen A.J., Helsper E.J., Eynon R. Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society. 2016. V. 19. № 6. P. 804–823.
- van Laar E., van Deursen A.J., van Dijk J.A., de Haan J. The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. № 72. P. 577–588.
- Vuorikari R., Punie Y., Carretero Gomez S., Van Den Brande G. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: the Conceptual Reference Model. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016.
- Williams D. On and Off the ‘Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era. Journ. of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006. V. 11. № 2. P. 593–628.
- Williamson B., Hague C. Digital participation, digital literacy, and school subjects: A review of the policies, literature and evidence. 2009.
Supplementary files
