The Аgent Concept of the Authentic Person: Justification and Empirical Verification
- Autores: Nartova-Bochaver S.K.1, Korneev A.A.2, Bochaver K.A.1
-
Afiliações:
- National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Edição: Volume 45, Nº 5 (2024)
- Páginas: 23-33
- Seção: To the 100th Anniversary of L.I. Antsyferova
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0205-9592/article/view/272449
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959224050033
- ID: 272449
Citar
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Somente assinantes
Resumo
The agent concept of the personal authenticity considering it personality trait that ensures a person’s fidelity to their nature, spatial and temporal circumstances of life, and calling, is systematically presented. The two main functions of authenticity, transcendental and adaptive, contribute to maintaining prosocial (including moral) attitudes and psychological well-being. The agent concept is presented in seven positions and verified empirically. The correlation study involved 430 respondents aged 17 to 32 years (Mage = 19.20 ± 1.22), 88 men and 342 women. The indicators of general well-being, positive and negative affect, and moral motives were measured. Eight authenticity indicators representing three concepts were independent variables. Three hypotheses were tested: 1) Dispositional authenticity is positively associated with a person’s psychological well-being; 2) Dispositional authenticity is positively associated with a person’s moral motives; 3) Indicators of dispositional authenticity within different paradigms form different patterns of connections with well-being indicators and moral motives. All three hypotheses were confirmed (the second one — partially). The prediction of well-being is stronger compared with moral motives, and the indicator of the agent concept forms the largest number of connections, giving evidence for both adaptive and transcendental functions of authenticity.
Sobre autores
S. Nartova-Bochaver
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: s-nartova@yandex.ru
ScD (Psychology), Professor
Rússia, 101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya str., 20A. Korneev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: korneeff@gmail.com
PhD, Senior Researcher
Rússia, 119991, Moscow, Leninskie Gory str., 1K. Bochaver
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
Email: konstantin.bochaver@gmail.com
PhD, Senior Researcher
Rússia, 101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya str., 20Bibliografia
- Abul’hanova-Slavskaja K.A. Strategija zhizni. Moscow: Mysl’, 1991. 299 p. (In Russian)
- Ancyferova L.I. Psihologicheskoe soderzhanie fenomena sub’’ekt i granicy sub’’ektno-dejatel’nostnogo podhoda. Eds. A.V. Brushlinskiy, M.I. Volovikova, V.N. Druzhinin. Problema sub’’ekta v psihologicheskoj nauke. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt, 2000. P. 26–42. (In Russian)
- Bochaver K.A., Reznichenko S.I. Lichnostnaja autentichnost’ kak resurs preodolenija sindroma professional’nogo vygoranija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2022. V. 43. № 2. P. 61–71. (In Russian)
- Brushlinskij A.V. O kriterijah sub’’ekta. Ed. A.V. Brushlinskiy. Psihologija individual’nogo i gruppovogo sub’’ekta. Moscow: Per Se, 2002. P. 9–33. (In Russian)
- Edamova A.Ju. Autentichnye otnoshenija: obzor zarubezhnyh issledovanij. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2023. V. 12. № 1. P. 109–118. (In Russian)
- Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Erofeeva V.G., Bajramjan R.M., Chuljukin K.S. Povsednevnye predstavlenija ob autentichnosti: ot detstva k junosti. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2023. V. 20. № 3. P. 523–547. (In Russian)
- Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Irhin B.D., Reznichenko S.I. Dispozicional’naja autentichnost’ vo vnutrilichnostnom prostranstve. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2020. V. 17. № 3. P. 500–519. (In Russian)
- Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Korneev A.A., Reznichenko S.I. Kratkaja versija oprosnika autentichnosti Kernisa-Goldmana: adaptacija v Rossii. Konsul’tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija. 2022. V. 30. № 3. P. 150–171. (In Russian)
- Rubinshtejn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2003. 508 p. (In Russian)
- Alchin C.E., Machin T.M., Martin N., Burton L.J. Authenticity and inauthenticity in adolescents: a scoping review. Adolescent Research Review. 2023. P. 1–37. doi: 10.1007/s40894-023-00218-8
- Gadgil M., Bossert W.H. Life historical consequences of natural selection. American Naturalist. 1970. V. 104. № 935. P. 1–24.
- Grégoire S., Baron L., Ménard J., Lachance L. The Authenticity Scale: psychometric properties of a French translation and exploration of its relationships with personality and well-being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. Revue Сanadienne des sciences du comportement. 2014. V. 46. № 3. P. 346–355.
- Guenther C.L., Zhang Y., Sedikides C. The authentic self is the self-enhancing self: a self-enhancement framework of authenticity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2024. V. 50 (8). P. 1182–1196. DOI: 10.1177/ 01461672231160653
- Hinton P.R., Brownlow C., McMurray I., Cozens B. SPSS explained. London: Routledge, 2004. 400 p.
- Janoff-Bulman R., Carnes N.C. The model of moral motives. Eds. Gray K., Graham J. Atlas of moral psychology. New York: The Guilford Press, 2018. P. 223–231.
- Kernis M.H., Goldman B.M. A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006. V. 38. P. 283–357.
- Maltby J., Wood A.M., Day L., Pinto D. The position of authenticity within extant models of personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 2012. V. 52. № 3. P. 269–273.
- McAdams D.P. The problem of meaning in personality psychology from the standpoints of dispositional traits, characteristic adaptations, and life stories. The Japanese Journal of Personality. 2010. V. 18. № 3. P. 173–186.
- Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Kuznetsova V.B. Friendly home and inhabitants’ morality: mutual relationships. Frontiers in psychology. 2018. V. 8. P. 2348.
- Reznichenko S.I., Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Irkhin B.D. Do authentic people care about the environment? A view from two paradigms. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2021. V. 14. № 3. P. 81–102.
- Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Baumert A. et al. Traits as situational sensitivities. psychometric and substantive comments on the TASS model proposed by Marshall and Brown. Mainz: Universität Koblenz-Landau, 2008.
- Sutton A. Living the good life: A meta-analysis of authenticity, well-being and engagement. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020. V. 153. Art. 109645. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109645
- Tennant R., Hiller L., Fishwick R. et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007. V. 5. № 1. P. 1–13.
- Thompson E.R. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2007. V. 38. № 2. P. 227–242.
- Toper A., Sellman E., Joseph S. Examining the structure of authenticity: A factor analytic study of the Authenticity Scale and Authenticity Inventory Subscales. The Humanistic Psychologist. 2022. V. 50. № 2. P. 304–319.
- Toper A., Sellman E., Joseph S. The prosocial and pro-environmental aspects of authenticity and the mediating role of self-transcendence. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies. 2023. doi: 10.1080/14779757.2023. 2255634
- Wood A.M., Linley P.A., Maltby J. et al. The Authentic Personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2008. V. 55. № 3. P. 385–399.
Arquivos suplementares
