UE - US: new barriers to trade

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article analyses the reasons for the complication of trade and economic relations between the European Union and the United States in recent years. The first section is devoted to the failed bilateral TTIP project, which was given strategic importance under the Obama administration. The destructive role of the Trump administration's policy toward the EU is noted. The hopes of improving bilateral relations after the arrival of the Biden administration were justified to a limited extent. New areas of conflict have emerged alongside the resolution of existing trade disputes. The Inflation Reduction Act adopted in the U.S. in 2022 became the most acute cause for discord. It has not yet been possible to reach a full agreement on how to mitigate negative consequences of this law for the EU. The EU, for its part, is forced to take retaliatory measures to protect its interests, including by strengthening its technological sovereignty, protection from economic coercion by third countries, etc. The analysis of emerging contradictions between the U.S. and Europe in the 21st century in trade and economic sphere leads to the conclusion that their most important cause is the increase in geopolitical rivalry throughout the world, due to which trade is progressively affected by geo-political reasons. At the same time, the problem of confrontation with China intensifies the differences between the U.S. and the EU.

作者简介

Alexey Portanskiy

HSE University;IMEMO RAS

Email: portanskiy@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia;Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Громыко Ал.А. (2018) Расколотый Запад: последствия для Евроатлантики. Современная Европа. № 4. С. 5-16.
  2. Мальцева В., Чупина Д. (2018) Торговый агропротекционизма между США и ЕС: оценка чувствительных позиций аграрной повестки ТТИП. Экономическая теория и хозяйственная практика: глобальные вызовы. Материалы международной конференции "Эволюция международной торговой системы: проблемы и перспективы -2018". 25-27 октября 2018 года, Санкт-Петербург. Под ред. С.Ф. Сутырина, И.В. Воробьевой, Н.А. Навроцкой, Л.В. Поповой, О.Ю. Трофименко. Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, Санкт-Петербург. С. 133-141.
  3. Портанский А. (2019) США - Европа: союзнические отношения под угрозой. Современная Европа. № 6. С. 30-39.
  4. Портанский А. (2019) Дональд Трамп: отход от принципов своих предшественников. Международная экономика. № 2. C. 21-32.
  5. Портанский А. (2021) ЕС и США: преодоление тяжелого наследия Д. Трампа. РСМД. 22.10.2021. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/es-i-ssha-preodolenie-tyazhelogo-naslediya-d-trampa/(дата обращения: 22.05.2023).
  6. Супян В. (2013) США в мировой экономике: перспективы сохранения лидерства. США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. № 7. С. 3-16.
  7. Шариков П. (2023) Отношения ЕС и США в конце 2022 - начале 2023 гг. Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. Вып. 111. Декабрь 2022 - февраль 2023. С. 105-108. URL: http://aevis.ru/upload/ckeditor/files/номер111_merged.pdf
  8. Capaldo J. (2014) The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: European Disintegration, Unemployment and Instability. GDAE Working Paper 14-03. October. Global Development And Environment Institute, Somerville, USA. 27 p. URL: https://sites.tufts.edu/gdae/files/2019/10/14-03CapaldoTTIP.pdf (accessed: 22.05.2023).
  9. Crespi F., Caravella S., Menghini M., Salvatori C. (2021) European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy.Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy. Vol. 56. No. 6. P. 348-354.
  10. Krueger A. (2021) Biden's Trumpy Start on Trade. Project Syndicate. 24.05.2021. URL: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/bidens-trade-policy-is-a-lot-like-trumps-by-anne-o-krueger-2021-05?utm_source=Project+Syndicate+Newsletter&utm_campaign=88d95de03c-sunday_newsletter_05_30_2021&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_73bad5b7d8-88d95de03c-107242922&mc_cid=88d95de03c&mc_eid=3ec6bd5598 (accessed: 22.05.2023).
  11. Renda A. (2021) The EU Industrial Strategy: Towards a Post-Growth Agenda? Intereconomics. Vol. 56(3). P. 133-138.

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

##common.cookie##