Crisis of values’ convergence in relations between Central Europe and Brussels

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The article analyses the origins of the current differences between Brussels and the countries of Central Europe, which tend to deepen and require much effort in order to preserve the unity of the European Union. The contradictions were already evident at the time of the admission of the countries to the EU, that took place according to an accelerated scenario in conditional compliance of these countries with the Maastricht and Copenhagen criteria. The condition, which dealt directly with the issues of market expansion and adaptation of new countries to it, initially received more attention than the condition, which involved political and legal issues. The deepening of the political union of the EU took place already after the admission of new countries, for many of which the new depths of convergence turned out to be unacceptable. However, that meant provoking confrontation with Brussels. Over 20 years of coexistence, the EU members made necessary compromises, however, from the middle of the second decade of the 21st century, disagreements became substantial and Brussels, using the financial leverage of the EU, began to pressure defiant countries, primarily Hungary and Poland. The author comes to the conclusion that in the current difficult international situation, the sides will have to reach a certain compromise.

Авторлар туралы

Lyubov Shishelina

MGIMO-University;Institute of Europe RAS

Email: l.shishelina@gmail.com
Russia, Moscow;Russia, Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Глинкина С.П., Куликова Н.В. (2013) Трансформация в Центральной и Восточной Европе: условия и результаты реализации. Результаты трансформации в странах Центральной и Восточной Европы: общественно-политический и экономический аспекты. Под ред. Н.В. Куликовой. Институт экономики РАН, Mосква. С. 17-44.
  2. Русакова М.Ю. (2022) Венгрия и Польша: новый этап противостояния с Брюсселем. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 82-91. doi: 10.31857/S0201708322070075
  3. Четверикова А.С. (ред.) (2022) Пределы самостоятельности Вишеградской группы в ЕС. ИМЭМО РАН, Москва. 153 с. doi: 10.20542/978-5-9535-0606-9
  4. Шишелина Л.Н. (2006) Расширение Европейского союза на восток и интересы России. Наука, Москва. 300 с.
  5. Шишелина Л.Н. (2018) Виктор Орбан и общеевропейский спор о ценностях. РСМД. 17.09.2018. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/viktor-orban-i-obshcheevropeyskiy-spor-o-tsennostyakh-/#2 (дата обращения: 30.11.2022).
  6. Шишелина Л.Н. (2020) Будапешт и Варшава: противостояние с Брюсселем. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 5-15. doi: 10.15211/soveurope720200515
  7. Шишелина Л.Н. (ред.) (2017) Вишеградская четвёрка в Европейском союзе: дилеммы конвергенции. ИЕ РАН, Москва. 138 с.
  8. Шишелина Л.Н. (ред.) (2018) Центральная Европа: политический портрет на фоне 100-летия. ИЕ РАН, Москва. 240 с.
  9. Sargentini J. (2018) Report on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded 4.7.2018 - (2017/2131(INL)).Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. 04.07.2018. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0250_EN.html
  10. Tavares R. (2012) Report on the situation of fundamental rights: standards and practices in Hungary (pursuant to the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012) (2012/2130(INI)).Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. 16.02.2012. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0229_EN.pdf

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>