German Political Parties: Correlation between Political Positioning and Social Composition of Parliamentary Groups

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article analyses the degree of correspondence between the political positioning of German parties and the social composition of their parliamentary groups in the 20th Bundestag. The study is based on German parties’ manifestos prepared for elections in 2021, as well as the authors' dataset containing information about the sociodemographic characteristics of members of the Parliament (gender, age, origin), their religion, marital status, and whether they have children. The authors select key programmatic points that can be reflected in the social composition of the parlia-mentary groups and then rank the parties according to the radicalism of their state-ments. According to the hypothesis, the ordinal place of the party in these rankings associates with the structure of representation in the party. The study found depar-ture from traditional gender roles being combined with a greater representation of women. Supporting youth corresponds to a higher share of young deputies, and the ethnocultural diversity endorsement positively correlates with the percentage of migrants. Traditionalist agenda increases the likelihood a party member declares its own religiosity and the presence of children. At the same time, the more tolerant the party is toward Islam, the higher the percentage of Muslims is. In addition, it was found that in parties that build their identity around specialized issues, this identity is reflected in the social composition of its deputies. Thus, the emphasis on the pro-tection of Christian values by the CDU/CSU corresponds to a higher proportion of Christians. Among the Left, which pays special attention to the new federal lands, eastern Germans have higher representation.

About the authors

M. V Khorolskaya

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)

Email: khorolskaya@imemo.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Politics), Research Fellow, Department for European Political Studies Moscow, Russia

E. D Katashevich

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)

Email: egor.katashevich@imemo.ru
Senior Research Assistant, Department for European Political Studies Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Белов В. Б. (2024) Партийно-политический ландшафт Германии после выборов в Европарламент. Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 3. С. 42–54. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran320244254
  2. Васильев В.И. (2023) Германская социал-демократия в неопределенной реальности. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 67. № 9. C. 31–47.
  3. Васильев В. (2024) Эволюция современной германской христианской демократии. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 68. № 7. С. 57–67. doi: 10.20542/01312227-2024-68-7-57-67
  4. Павлов Н.В., Дмитриев Д.А. (2024) «Левая»: кризис идеи или врожденный дефект? Современная Европа. № 3. C. 82–94. doi: 10.31857/S0201708324030070
  5. Погорельская С.В. (2024) Антивоенные силы в ФРГ в 2022‒2023 гг.: возможен ли их союз? Общественные науки и современность. № 1. С. 106–119.
  6. Тимошенкова Е.В. (2020) Партийно-политическая система Германии в период канцлерства А. Меркель (2005–2017 гг.). Ин-т Европы РАН, Москва. 148 с.
  7. Хорольская М.В. (2024a) Восточные немцы в элитах объединенной Германии: проблема недопредставленности. Общественные науки и современность. № 1. С. 92–105. doi: 10.31857/S0869049924010078
  8. Хорольская М.В. (2024b) Современные политические элиты ФРГ: основные характеристики и механизмы формирования. База данных. Свидетельство о регистрации базы данных RU, № 2024620137: заявл. 17.01.2024: опубл. 07.02.2024. URL: https://fips.ru/EGD/a6e41955-7fd3-416b-bf9b-cd64bd3fe932 (дата обращения: 01.12.2024).
  9. Bukow S., Jun U. (2016) Parteien und moderne Staatlichkeit. Parteien in Staat und Gesellschaft. Zum Verhältnis von Parteienstaat und Parteiendemokratie. Ed. by S. Bukow, U. Jun, O. Niedermayer. Springer VS Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, Germany. P. 3–14.
  10. Cerda N., Gunderson J. (2024) Are party families in Europe ideologically coherent today? European Journal of Political Research. No. 63. P. 1208–1226.
  11. Guinaudeau I., Persico S. (2013) What is issue competition? Conflict, consensus, and issue ownership in party competition. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. No. 24(3). P. 312–333. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2013.858344
  12. Heimerl V.M. (2023) Paritätische Aufstellung von Kandidaten fur Bundestagswahlen. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, Germany. 195 p.
  13. Inglehart R., Norris P. (2019) Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 564 p.
  14. Krause W., Giebler H. (2020) Shifting Welfare Policy Positions: The Impact of Radical Right Populist Party Success Beyond Migration Politics. Representation. No. 56 (3). P. 331–348. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2019.1661871
  15. Niedermayer O. (2024) Parteimitglieder in Deutschland: Version 2024. Arbeitshefte aus dem Otto-Stammer-Zentrum. No 32. Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 98 p.
  16. Weßels B. (2022) Leaving the Space – Opening the Gap?: Electoral Effects of Parties’ and Voters’ Repositioning. The Changing German Voter. Ed. by R. Schmitt-Beck, S. Roßteutscher, H. Schoen, B. Weßels, Ch. Wolf. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. P. 50–77.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).