Common fisheries policy in the light of Brexit

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article examines the impact of the Сommon Fisheries Policy of the European Union (CFP) on the UK's withdrawal from the EU. On the one hand, the article explains the reasons for the appearance of an economically insignificant fishing issue on the forefront of the British domestic political agenda on the eve of Brexit. On the other hand, it sheds light on the factor of the CFP in the negotiations on Britain's withdrawal from the EU and the subsequent Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) between the parties. Also, the author elaborates on the role of fishing communities in the Brexit vote, as well as on the factors that shaped the bargaining positions and strategies of the parties in the Brexit negotiations with regards to the CFP. The article focuses on institutional and political-economic features of the CFP that determined the final agreement in terms of fisheries. Despite a few concessions from Brussels and the transfer of a quarter of the European proportion of the catch to fishermen of the United Kingdom during the transition period, the Agreement does not involve fundamental changes in the UK's fisheries policy and the cooperation with the EU. The final deal reflects the interdependence of the partners, the Europeanization of the fisheries management, and preserves preferential access to British waters for European fishermen.

Sobre autores

Vyacheslav Kolomin

Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vokolomin@ya.ru
Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Бабынина Л.О. (2015) Исландия и Европейский союз: рыба и банки. Аналитические записки Института Европы Российской академии наук. № 6. URL: http://www.zapiski-ieran.ru/images/analitika/an6.pdf
  2. Бабынина Л.О. (2016) Значение Brexit для Европейского союза. Современная Европа. № 70(4). С. 21-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope420162133
  3. Коломин В.О. (2022) Общая рыболовная политика ЕС сквозь призму концепции многоуровневого управления. Вестник Московского Университета. Серия 25: Международные Отношения и Мировая Политика. № 14(1). С. 151-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2022-14-1-151-174
  4. Моисеева Д.Э. (2020) "Репатриация" рыболовной политики: случай Великобритании. Современная Европа. № 97(4). С. 112-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope42020112122
  5. Руденкова Д. Э. (2015) "Рыбные войны" с участием Европейского союза. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 6. С. 71-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-6-71-81
  6. Энтин К.В. (2015) Право Европейского союза и практика Суда Европейского союза. Норма, ИНФРА-М, Москва. 240 c.
  7. Bossche K. (2005) EU Enlargements and Fisheries: a Legal Analysis Steps Towards the Re-Nationalisation of EU Maritime Waters. Jurisprudencija. No. 72(64). P. 124-136.
  8. Carpenter G. (2017) Not in the Same Boat: the Economic Impact of Brexit Across UK Fishing Fleets. URL: https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/Not-in-the-Same-Boat-PDF.pdf (accessed: 06.04.2023).
  9. Carpenter G., Kleinjans R., Villasante S., & O'Leary B.C. (2016) Landing the blame: The influence of EU Member States on quota setting. Marine Policy. No. 64. P. 9-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.001
  10. Charles A.T. (1992) Fishery conflicts. Marine Policy. No. 16(5). P. 379-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(92)90006-B
  11. Connolly J., Zwet A. van der Huggins C., McAngus C. (2022) The governance capacities of Brexit from a Scottish perspective: The case of fisheries policy. Public Policy and Administration. No. 37(3). P. 342-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720936328
  12. Echebarria Fernández J., Johansson T.M., Skinner J.A., Lennan M. (2022) Fisheries and the Law in Europe. Routledge, London, UK. 170 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252481
  13. Gray T.S. (1998) Fishing and Fairness: the Justice of the Common Fisheries Policy. The Politics of Fishing. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK. P. 228-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26775-0_15
  14. Grotius H. (2001) The Freedom of the Seas, or the Right Which Belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian Trade. The Lawbook Exchange. 182 p.
  15. Huggins C., Connolly J., McAngus C., van der Zwet A. (2020) Brexit and the Uncertain Future of Fisheries Policy in the United Kingdom: Political and Governance Challenges. Ocean Yearbook Online. No. 34(1). P. 20-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004426214_003
  16. Jóhannesson G.T. (2004) How "cod war" came: the origins of the Anglo-Icelandic fisheries dispute, 1958-1961. Historical Research. No. 77(198). P. 543-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2004.00222.x
  17. Napier I. (2016). Fish Landings from the United Kingdom's Exclusive Economic Zone: by area, nationality and species. NAFC Marine Centre. URL: https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/en/publications/fish-landings-from-the-united-kingdoms-exclusive-economic-zone-by (accessed: 06.04.2023).
  18. Penas Lado E. (2016) The Common Fisheries Policy: The Quest for Sustainability. Wiley-Blackwell. 392 p.
  19. Schatz V. (2019) Access to Fisheries in the United Kingdom's Territorial Sea after its Withdrawal from the European Union: A European and International Law Perspective. Goettingen Journal of International Law. No. 9(3). P. 457-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-9-3-schatz
  20. Sobrino Heredia J.M. (2017) Research for PECH Committee - Common Fisheries Policy and BREXIT - Legal framework for governance. European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels, Belgium. 158 p. doi: 10.2861/621765
  21. Vieira M.B. (2003) Mare Liberum vs. Mare Clausum: Grotius, Freitas, and Selden's Debate on Dominion over the Seas. Journal of the History of Ideas. Vol. 64. No. 3. P. 361-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2003.0043

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies