The EU approach towards China in the context of countering hybrid threats

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article examines the EU approach towards China in terms of dealing with the hybrid threats. The study is based on the method of systemic analysis. It is revealed that the EU intention to strengthen its role in the international arena and to reduce dependence on third countries in providing critical infrastructure, as well as its solidarity with the rhetoric and practice of the USA to limit the economic influence of China, provokes a debate on the PRC’s activity within the framework of the narrative of hybrid threats. The documents of the European Parliament contain the majority of accusations of China in creating such threats. The Commission and the Council of the EU are trying to adhere to a less politicized tone, but their publications also contain references to the RPC as an actor of hybrid threats. The approach of the EU’s “institutional triangle” is also illustrated by the documents of the European External Action Service, EU agencies, and specialized think tanks. The EU institutions are seeking to limit China’s role in every area, from investment to education and media.

作者简介

Darya Bazarkina

Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: bazarkina-icspsc@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Базаркина Д.Ю. (2022) Практика противодействия гибридным угрозам: опыт Европейского союза и его государств-членов. Современная Европа. № 2(109). С. 132-145. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/S0201708322020103
  2. Болгова И., Мельникова Ю., Лисякевич Р. (2022) Формирование китайского направления политики ЕС: роль стран Центральной и Восточной Европы. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 66. № 6. С. 79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-6-79-90
  3. Воскресенский А. Д. (2021) Новая мировая архитектоника, макрорегиональные трансформации потенциально глобального характера и значение китайского опыта. Сравнительная политика. № 3. С. 5-20. doi: 10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10024
  4. Ломанов А. В. (2019) Отношения Китая и ЕС: между сотрудничеством и соперничеством. Китай в мировой и региональной политике. История и современность. № 24. С. 158-172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/2618-6888-2019-10009
  5. Фриман Ч. (2021) Война с Китаем из-за Тайваня: и что тогда? Россия в глобальной политике. № 3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2021-19-3-48-60
  6. Чижевская М.П. (2023) ЕС - Китай: Китай готов давать более жесткий ответ на обвинения ЕС. Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. № 111. С. 113-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/eufacts12023113117
  7. Шариков П.А. (2022) Роль ЕС в стратегии национальной безопасности США. Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 6. С. 15-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran620221523
  8. Aukia J. (2021) China as a hybrid influencer: Non-state actors as state proxies. Hybrid CoE Research Report 1. Helsinki, Finland. 31 p.
  9. Crookes P. (2013) Resetting EU-China relations from a values-based to an interests-based engagement.International Politics. No. 50. P. 639-663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.25.
  10. Giannopoulos G., Smith H., Theocharidou M. (2020) The Landscape of Hybrid Threats: A conceptual model. European Commission, Ispra, Italy. 52 p.
  11. Glen C. M., Murgo R. C. (2007) EU-China relations: balancing political challenges with economic opportunities. Asia Europe Journal. No. 5. P. 331-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-007-0121-7
  12. Hellendoorn E. (2022) Financial geopolitics and hybrid conflict: Strategic competition in a financialized world, Hybrid CoE Working Paper 16, Helsinki, Finland.
  13. Huang Wh., Xiang J. (2019) Pursuing Soft Power through the Confucius Institute: a Large-N Analysis, Journal of Chinese Political Science. Vol. 24. P. 249-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9571-6
  14. Karásková I. (2020) One China under media heaven: How Beijing hones its skills in information operations, Hybrid CoE Strategic Analysis 23. Helsinki, Finland. 8 p.
  15. Mattioli R., Malatras A., Hunter E. N., Biasibetti Penso M. G., Bertram D., Neubert I. (2023) Identifying emerging cyber security threats and challenges for 2030. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), Athens - Heraklion, Greece. 64 p.
  16. Wuttke J. (2022) A Roadmap to Bolstering EU-China Relations. Transition and Opportunity. China and Globalization. Ed. by H. Wang, L. Miao. Springer, Singapore, Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8603-0_2

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

##common.cookie##