Differentiation in Russians' Perception of Inequality and Their Dynamics

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

A number of recent inequality studies emphasize the importance of considering not only its objective characteristics, but also its subjective perception. This makes it especially relevant to study possible determinants of attitudes towards inequality. In addition, the variability of attitudes towards inequality over time is of research interest. To what extent has the attitude towards inequality in Russia changed in recent years? And how different is the attitude of Russians towards inequality from the population of other countries? Accounting for the subjective aspects of inequality will make it possible to better understand the social processes taking place in Russian society. In this paper, on the basis of the European Social Survey 2006-2016 data, the features of the subjective perception of inequality by Russians in various population groups and their dynamics were studied. The Gini coefficient and the decile coefficient were used as indicators of objective actual income inequality. Special attention is paid to the differentiation of views depending on the socio-demographic, income and other characteristics of the population.

About the authors

Алла Салмина

Institute for Social Analysis and Forecasting, the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Горшков М.К., Тихонова Н.Е., и др. Социальные неравенства и социальная политика в современной России. М.: Наука, 2008.
  2. Капелюшников Р.И. Экономическое неравенство—вселенское зло? // Вопросы экономики. 2019. №. 4. С. 91–106.
  3. Капелюшников Р.И. Неравенство: как не примитивизировать проблему // Вопросы экономики. 2017. №. 4. С. 117–139.
  4. Мареева С.В. Социальные неравенства и социальная структура современной России в восприятии населения // Вестник Института социологии. 2018. Т. 9. №. 3. С. 101–120. doi: 10.19181/vis.2018.26.3.527.
  5. Мареева С.В., Тихонова Н.Е. Бедность и социальные неравенства в России в общественном сознании // Мир России. Социология. Этнология. 2016. Т. 25. №. 2. С. 37–67.
  6. Монусова Г.А. Отношение к перераспределению доходов и социальная мобильность // Экономическая социология. 2017. Т. 18. №. 5. С. 14–39.
  7. Монусова Г.А. Чем определяется восприятие неравенства в доходах // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2016. Т. 60. №. 1. С. 53–67.
  8. Салмина А.А. Запрос россиян на сокращение неравенства и факторы его формирования в сравнении с другими европейскими странами // Власть. 2017. №. 2. С. 27–37.
  9. Салмина А.А. Отношение населения к социальному неравенству: Россия в сравнении с другими европейскими странами // XIII Международная научная конференция по проблемам развития экономики и общества. В 4 кн. Кн. 3. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2012. С. 87–95.
  10. Тихонова Н.Е. Оптимальная модель социальной политики в массовых представлениях // Социологические исследования. 2006. №. 12. С. 9–15.
  11. Шкаратан О.И. Социально-экономическое неравенство и его воспроизводство в современной России. М.: ОЛМА Медиа Групп, 2009.
  12. Bussolo M. et al. Toward a new social contract: Taking on distributional tensions in Europe and Central Asia. The World Bank, 2018.
  13. Bussolo M., Torre I., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. I Perceive Therefore I Demand: The Formation of Inequality Perceptions and Demand for Redistribution. The World Bank, 2019.
  14. Cochrane J. How and why we care about inequality / Ed. by Church T., Miller C., Taylor J. Inequality and Economic Policy: Essays in Honor of Gary Becker. Hoover Press, 2015. P. 147–180.
  15. Engelhardt C., Wagener A. Biased Perceptions of Income Inequality and Redistribution // CESifo Working Paper Series. 2014. No. 4838. P. 1–21.
  16. Gimpelson V., Monusova G. Perception of inequality and social mobility // Higher School of Economics Research Paper. No. WP BRP. 2014. Vol. 84.
  17. Gimpelson V., Treisman D. Misperceiving inequality // Economics & Politics. 2018. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 27–54.
  18. McCloskey D.N. Measured, unmeasured, mismeasured, and unjustified pessimism: a review essay of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the twenty-first century // Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics. 2014. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 73–115.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies