The Role of Peer Review in Raising Quality of Scientific Sociological Knowledge (The Case of Sociological Studies)
- Authors: Demidenko S.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Sociological Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 10 (2024)
- Pages: 80-92
- Section: TO THE 50th ANNIVERSARY OF SOCIS
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0132-1625/article/view/272470
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162524100077
- ID: 272470
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article focuses on the process of reviewing articles submitted to Russian sociological journals. Requirements for peer review procedures, its types and organization features are discussed. The problematic aspects of the review process in modern conditions are emphasized: excessive formalism, contradictory assessments, narrow circle of reviewers, dishonesty and violation of scientific ethics. The types of peer review used are discussed: main editor peer review, open peer review, single blind peer review, doudle-blind peer review. Attention is focused on the procedure for reviewing articles in the editorial office of the journal “Sociological Studies”, including taking into account changes over the past 10–15 years. The criterias and forms of assessment are being analyzed. The collegial nature of the evaluation of incoming articles is emphasized. A number of issues related to building scientific communication, in particular the interaction of the editorial board with the sociological community, are touched upon. The problematic aspects are summarized: the reduction of the scientific community, its disunity, methodological pluralism, etc., which affect the review process. The conclusion is made about the important role of peer review in the development and support of not only the sociological community, but also sociology as a science in general, because this is an important and integral part of the production of new knowledge.
Full Text
About the authors
Svetlana Yu. Demidenko
Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Sociological Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: demidsu@yandex.ru
Researcher, Executive Secretary (Editor) of the Sociological Studies Journal
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Chernysh M. F. (2022) Peer Reviewing in Contemporary Russian Science. Upravlenie naukoj: teoriya i praktika [Science Management: Theory and Practice]. Vol. 4. No. 1: 18–39. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.1.1. (In Russ.)
- Gaidin B. N. (2022) Russian scientific journals in new geopolitical conditions: difficulties and prospects of developmen. Upravlenie naukoj: teoriya i praktika [Management of science: theory and practice]. Vol. 4. No. 3: 44–52. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.4. (In Russ.)
- Guba K. (2019) To be the main journal in Russian sociology: when the mission matters. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya [Economic sociology]. Vol. 20. No. 4: 14–38. (In Russ.)
- Kaltenbrunner W., Birch K., Amuchastegui M. (2021) Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals. Science Technology and Human Values. No. 47(4): 670–697. DOI. Org/10.1177/01622439211068798.
- Kerimov T. (2022) The “Ontological Turn” in the Social Sciences: The Return of Epistemology. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological Review]. Vol. 21. No. 1: 109–130. (In Russ.)
- Kirillova O. V. (2013) Editorial publication of scientific journals according to international standards: rating in Scopus. Moscow: Nobel’ press. (In Russ.)
- Kirillova O. V., Tikhonova E. V. (2022) Quality criteria of a scientific journal: measurement and significance. Nauchnyj redaktor i izdatel’ [Scientific editor and publisher]. No. 7(1): 12–27. (In Russ.)
- Kolomiets V. P. (2024) Research problem as a key aspect of scientific publications in a sociological journal. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 3–14. doi: 10.31857/S0132162524030014. (In Russ.)
- Modern Russian sociology: state and prospects of development (2018) (A. M. Bekarev, I. F. Devyatko, O. M. Zhuravlev, V. G. Nikolaev, O. A. Oberemko, D. G. Podvoysky, V. V. Radaev, Y. M. Reznik, D. M. Rogozin, V. V. Shcherbina). Lichnost’. Kul’tura Obshchestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. XX. Iss. 12 (No. 9798): 158–191. doi: 10.30936/1606951X2018201/2158191. (In Russ.)
- Raitskaya L. K. (2017) On the prospects of creating a comprehensive system of independent review of Russian scientific journals. Nauchnyj redaktor i izdatel’ [Scientific editor and publisher]. No. 2(2–4): 84–88. doi: 10.24069/2542-0267-2017-2-4-84-88. (In Russ.)
- Semenov E. V. (2023) Development of a network of scientific journals in Russia: strategic, technological and organizational issues. Sociologicheskaya nauka i praktika [Sociological science and social practice]. Vol. 11. No. 3: 116–140. doi: 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.3.6. (In Russ.)
- Tambovtsev V. L. (2021) Peer reviewing in the contemporary academic communications. Upravlenie naukoj: teoriya i praktika [Science Management: Theory and Practice]. Vol. 3. No. 1: 35–54. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.1.2. (In Russ.)
- Toshchenko Zh.T. (2015) About a quality of scientific publications. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 3–4.
