Informality in Society: Searching for Explorative Methodology

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to discuss and propose a solution to the methodological problems arising in the study of fundamental social relations embedded in social institutions and informal practices. The authors present a concept based on the thesis of informal interactions as a relatively ontologically independent phenomenon in society. It is shown that informal practices act as a public and civilizational resource that determines not only the viability of society, but also its competitiveness in the global world. It is the totality of mass informal social communications outside the existing institutional framework that makes it possible to understand what a particular society is. The article analyzes some real situations of contradictory interaction of institutions and informal practices in Russian society. When analyzing the sources of informal practices, the authors distinguish inversive, adaptive and constructive informality as systematically ordered communications that arise outside the institutional space. Such conceptualization expands the possibilities of understanding specific cases in the socio-economic and socio-political life of Russian society and provides grounds for their instrumental empirical research. study.

About the authors

Valentina Fedorovna Levicheva

Autonomous non-profit organization to promote the development of civil society institutions “Fair World Institute”

Moscow, Russia

Sergey L. Dimans

Moscow State Academy of Physical Education

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Барсукова С.Ю. Эссе о неформальной экономике, или 16 оттенков серого. Нац. исслед. ун-т «Высшая школа экономики». Изд. 2-е. М.: Дом Высшей школы экономики, 2017.
  2. Бауман З. Индивидуализированное общество. М.: Логос, 2005.
  3. Бурдье П. Практический смысл. СПб.: Алетейя, 2001.
  4. Кастельс М. Становление общества сетевых структур // Новая постиндустриальная волна на Западе. Антология. Под ред. В.Л. Иноземцева. М.: Academia, 1999. С. 494–505.
  5. Лиотар Ж.-Ф. Состояние постмодерна. М.: Институт экспериментальной социологии; СПб.: Алетейя, 1998.
  6. Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд экономической книги Начала, 1997.
  7. Хайек Ф. Право, законодательство и свобода: Современное понимание либеральных принципов справедливости и политики. М.: ИРИСЭН, 2006.
  8. Хелмке Г., Левитски С. Неформальные институты и сравнительная политика: основные направления исследований // Прогнозис. 2007. № 10. С. 187–211.
  9. Щербина В.В. Популяционно-селекционная модель организационного развития: содержание, сфера и перспективы применения (статья 1) // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 6. С. 78–86.
  10. Edgerton R.B. Rules, Exceptions, and Social Order. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
  11. Urry J. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies