Features of the introduced species composition and state in the arboreta of Dzhanybek research station in the Northern Pre-Caspian Semi-Desert

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The results of studying introduced species diversity and state under rainfed conditions at the Research station of the Institute of Forest Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences have been presented. The station is located in the clay semi-desert of the Northern Pre-Caspian region between the Volga and Ural rivers. The collections of two arboreta were examined. The first arboretum was established in 1953 on hydromorphic meadow-chestnut soils of large mesodepressions, and the second – in 1974 on solonetzic automorphic soils. The arboreta were originally established with an idea of complete elimination of irrigation. In recent decades, tending and silvicultural treatments were discontinued for a number of reasons. An annotated list of tree and shrub species includes 77 species belonging to 25 families and 44 genus. In the arboretum on the large mesodepression, the number of species surviving for more than half a century is 35% in relation to the number of “core” introduced species. Mostly, the species are represented by the families Rosaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Fagaceae, Fabacea, Oleaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, Ulmaceae. Some specimens older than 70 years are in satisfactory condition and produce viable volunteer regrowth. The main stages of their acclimatization, in relation to age, and changes in growing conditions, as affected by plants themselves as well as climate, are distinguished. In arboretum on solonetzic soils, the survival of species is 50%. The composition of tree and shrub vegetation of an unused pond, where spontaneous vegetation formed an intrazonal willow-oleaster-poplar community of quasi-riparian type, and of the overgrowing fallow land, where a specific “savannah-like” landscape was formed, have been studied. This allowed to identify the species whose life strategy contributes to their successful colonization of human-disturbed habitats and, in some cases, manifestation of the features of naturalization and invasiveness. The most promising species for landscaping, parks and other plantings in such harsh natural and climatic conditions were also determined.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

M. L. Sizemskaya

Institute of Forest Science, RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: sizem@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Uspenskoe, Moscow Region

M. K. Sapanov

Institute of Forest Science, RAS

Email: sizem@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Uspenskoe, Moscow Region

References

  1. Semenyutina A.V. 2013. Dendroflora of forest-meliorative complexes. Volgograd. 266 p. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28414299 (In Russian)
  2. Brand D., Moshe I., Shachak M. 2015. Functional rehabilitation of desertified ecosystems in Israel: Ecological and socioecological perspectives. – In: Living Land. UNCCD. P. 88–92. https://catalogue.unccd.int/562_Living_Land_ENG.pdf
  3. Vlasenko A. 2015. Analysis of Ex Situ Cultivation of Ukrainian Rare Steppe Dendroflora. – Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University. 5(1): 24–47. https://www.ujecology.com/articles/analysis-of-ex-situ-cultivation-of-ukrainian-rare-steppe-dendroflora.pdf (In Ukrainian)
  4. Sun R., Tian T. 2016. Houston Arboretum & Nature Center, Texas. – Landsc. Archit. Front. 4(3): 86–99. https://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2016/V4/I3/86
  5. Boiko T.O., Dementieva O.I. 2018. The tree vegetation of the Kherson State Agrarian University Arboretum. – Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 8(2): 120–127.
  6. https://www.ujecology.com/articles/the-tree-vegetation-of-the-kherson-state-agrarian-university-arboretum.pdf (In Ukrainian)
  7. Burda R.I., Koniakin S.N. 2019. The non-native woody species of the flora of Ukraine: Introduction, naturalization and invasion. – Biosyst. Divers. 27(3): 276–290. https://doi.org/10.15421/011937
  8. [Biogeocoenotic principles of the reclamation of the Northern Caspian semi-desert]. 1974. Moscow. 360 p. (In Russian)
  9. Karandina S.N., Erpert S.D. 1972. [Climatic testing of tree species in the Caspian semi-desert]. Moscow. 127 p. (In Russian)
  10. Senkevich N.G., Olovyannikova I.N. 1996. [Introduction of arboreal plants in semi-deserts of the Northern Caspian Region]. Moscow. 180 p. (In Russian)
  11. The Plant list. Version 1.1. September 2013. WFO (2023): The World Flora Online. https://www.worldfloraonline.org/
  12. Semenyutina A.V., Tereshkin A.V. 2016. Protective sfforestation: Analysis of the composition and the scientific basis of increasing biodiversity dendroflora. – Advances in Current Natural Sciences. 4: 99–104. https://natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=35870 (In Russian)
  13. Semenyutina A.V., Dolgih A.A., Panov V.I., Zelenyak A.K. 2016. Introduction as a way of increasing biodiversity and enrichment of dendroflora in arid areas. – Environment and Human: Ecological Studies. 3: 47–54. http://soc-ecol.ru/introduction-as-a-way-of-increasing-biodiversity-and-enrichment-of-dendroflora-in-arid-areas/ (In Russian)
  14. Yatsenko I.O., Vinogradova Yu.K. 2018. Invasive activity of woody plants in the Tsytsyn Botanical Garden of the RAS. – Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. 4: 117–131. http://www.sevin.ru/invasjour/issues/2018_4/Yatsenko_18_4.pdf (In Russian)
  15. Sizemskaya M.L., Kopyl I.V., Sapanov M.K. 1995. Colonization of artificial mesorelief lowlands by wood and shrub vegetation in a semi-desert of the Caspian Sea Region. – Russian Journal of Forest Science (Lesovedenie). 1: 15–23. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21267005 (In Russian)
  16. Sizemskaya M.L., Elekesheva M.M., Sapanov M.K. 2020. Formation of forest biogeocenoses on disturbed lands of the Northern Caspian Region. – Povolzhskiy J. of Ecology. 1: 86–98. https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2020-1-86-98 (In Russian)
  17. Berezutsky M.A., Zavyalov E.V., Mosolova E. Yu., Tabachishin V.G., Yakushev N.N. 2008. [On the naturalization and some biotic relationships of oleaster (Elaeagnus oxycarpa Schlecht.) in the Saratov region. – Bulletin of Botanic Garden of Saratov State University. 7: 52–59. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28781130 (In Russian)
  18. Zhang X., Li G., Du S. 2018. Simulating the potential distribution of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. cased on climatic constraints in China. – Ecol. Eng. 113: 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.01.009
  19. Sapanov M.K., Sizemskaya M.L. 2021. Ecological features of the ash-leaved maple regrowth in Russia’s arid regions. – Russian Journal of Forest Science (Lesovedenie). 3: 325–334. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0024114821030098 (In Russian)
  20. Sapanov M.K. 2003. [Ecology of forest plantations in arid regions]. Tula. 248 p. (In Russian)
  21. Sapanov M.K. 2010. Influence of climate change on the water resources of Northern Pricaspian Lowland. – Arid Ecosystems. 16(5): 25–30. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15487267 (In Russian)
  22. Sapanov M.K. 2018. Environmental Implications of Climate Warming for the Northern Caspian Region. – Arid Ecosystems. 8(1): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096118010092
  23. Vinogradova Yu.K., Mayorov S.R., Khorun L.V. 2010. [The Black Book of flora of Central Russia: alien plant species in ecosystems of Central Russia]. Moscow. 503 p.
  24. https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/books/o_26717 (In Russian)
  25. Nentwig W., Bacher S., Kumschick S., Pyšek P., Vilà M. 2018. More than “100 worst” alien species in Europe. – Biol. Invasions. 20(6): 1611–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1651-6
  26. van Kleunen M., Dawson W., Essl F., Pergl J., Winter M., Weber E., et al. 2015. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. – Nature. 525(7567): 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Arboretum on meadow-chestnut soils of a large mesodepression: aerial view (a), main aisle of the arboretum (b), massive oak plantings (c), arboretum on the soils of solonetzic complex (d), overgrown unused pond (e), overgrown fallow field (f).

Download (709KB)
3. Fig. 2. The ratio of the surviving species of the parent (M) and self-seeded (C) specimens in the arboreta of the Dzhanybek Research Station on meadow-chestnut soils (A) and on the solonetzic complex (B).

Download (100KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies