Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In depressed patients, changes in spontaneous brain activity, in particular, the strength of functional connectivity between different regions are observed. The data on changes in the synchrony of different regions of interest in the brain can serve as markers of depressive symptoms and as the targets for the corresponding therapy. The study involved 21 patients with mild depression and 21 healthy volunteers; by the time of second fMRI scanning, 15 and 19 subjects, respectively). The subjects underwent two 4-min sessions of resting state fMRI with 2-4 months interval between the recordings; on the basis of these data, functional connectivity between regions of interest was assessed. During the first session, depressed patients demonstrated more pronounced connection between the right frontal eye field and cerebellar area III. When the sample was restricted to subjects who underwent both fMRI sessions, depressed patients demonstrated closer relations of the right parietal operculum and cerebellar vermis area VIII. During the second recording, healthy subjects showed stronger connectivity between more than 20 frontal, temporal, and subcortical regions of interest and cerebellum area II. In healthy participants, brainstem functional interactions increased from the first to the second fMRI-recording. In depressed subjects a number of cortical areas split from left intraparietal sulcus, but the left temporal cortex became more intra-connected. The results confirm the differences in functional connectivity between depressed and healthy subjects. At the same time, attention should be paid to the variability of the data obtained.

About the authors

D. D. Bezmaternykh

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

M. E. Mel’nikov

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

L. I. Kozlova

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

M. B. Shtark

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

A. A. Savelov

International Tomography Center, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

E. D. Petrovskii

International Tomography Center, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

O. S. Shubina

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

K. A. Natarova

International Institute of Psychology and Psychotherapy

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk


Copyright (c) 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies