Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

In depressed patients, changes in spontaneous brain activity, in particular, the strength of functional connectivity between different regions are observed. The data on changes in the synchrony of different regions of interest in the brain can serve as markers of depressive symptoms and as the targets for the corresponding therapy. The study involved 21 patients with mild depression and 21 healthy volunteers; by the time of second fMRI scanning, 15 and 19 subjects, respectively). The subjects underwent two 4-min sessions of resting state fMRI with 2-4 months interval between the recordings; on the basis of these data, functional connectivity between regions of interest was assessed. During the first session, depressed patients demonstrated more pronounced connection between the right frontal eye field and cerebellar area III. When the sample was restricted to subjects who underwent both fMRI sessions, depressed patients demonstrated closer relations of the right parietal operculum and cerebellar vermis area VIII. During the second recording, healthy subjects showed stronger connectivity between more than 20 frontal, temporal, and subcortical regions of interest and cerebellum area II. In healthy participants, brainstem functional interactions increased from the first to the second fMRI-recording. In depressed subjects a number of cortical areas split from left intraparietal sulcus, but the left temporal cortex became more intra-connected. The results confirm the differences in functional connectivity between depressed and healthy subjects. At the same time, attention should be paid to the variability of the data obtained.

Sobre autores

D. Bezmaternykh

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

M. Mel’nikov

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

L. Kozlova

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

M. Shtark

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics; Novosibirsk National Research State University

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

A. Savelov

International Tomography Center, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

E. Petrovskii

International Tomography Center, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

O. Shubina

Research Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

K. Natarova

International Institute of Psychology and Psychotherapy

Email: mikhail-melnikov@mail.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk


Declaração de direitos autorais © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature, 2018

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies