The kinetics of fluorescent DNA labeling using PCR with different Taq polymerases depends on the chemical structures of modified nucleotides
- Authors: Lisitsa T.S.1, Shershov V.E.1, Spitsyn M.A.1, Guseinov T.O.1, Ikonnikova A.Y.1, Fesenko D.O.1, Lapa S.A.1, Zasedatelev A.S.1, Chudinov A.V.1, Nasedkina T.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
- Issue: Vol 62, No 3 (2017)
- Pages: 366-372
- Section: Molecular Biophysics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0006-3509/article/view/152299
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350917030095
- ID: 152299
Cite item
Abstract
The kinetics of DNA labeling during PCR using six fluorescent derivatives of 2′-deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate has been studied. These compounds differ in their chemical structure, total electric charge and the length of the linker between a dye and the C5 position of a pyrimidine base. The efficiency of the incorporation of the fluorescent derivatives into a growing DNA chain by four commercially available Taq DNA polymerases with 5′→3′ exonuclease and hot start activity has been determined using real-time PCR with a TaqMan probe and the subsequent electrophoretic analysis of the reaction products. Modified deoxyuridines with a total positive or negative charge of the chromophore were practically not incorporated by Taq polymerases during PCR. The modified deoxyuridines with a neutral charge of the chromophore were effectively incorporated into DNA. The extended length of the linker between the pyrimidine base and the chromophore led to a lower PCR inhibition and a more effective inclusion of modified nucleotides in the growing DNA chain. This fact can be explained by the reduced steric effects that were caused by the dye. As a result, the most promising combinations of fluorescently labeled nucleotide and Taq polymerase have been chosen for further use in fluorescent DNA labeling.
About the authors
T. S. Lisitsa
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
V. E. Shershov
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
M. A. Spitsyn
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
T. O. Guseinov
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
A. Yu. Ikonnikova
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
D. O. Fesenko
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
S. A. Lapa
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
A. S. Zasedatelev
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
A. V. Chudinov
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
T. V. Nasedkina
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Author for correspondence.
Email: nased@biochip.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
Supplementary files
