Renal function, endotoxicosis, and oxidative stress in patients after open and laparoscopic nephrectomy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal cell cancer is accompanied by the development of a disorder of renal function. The parameters of homeostasis after nephrectomy in renal cell cancer are not well understood.

AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the kidney functional status and parameters of homeostasis in patients with RCC after nephrectomy performed by open and laparoscopic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with renal cell cancer Т3N0M0 were randomized according to the surgery into the comparison group with open nephrectomy (n = 40; 50,1 ± 3,4 years old; 18 males, 22 females) and the main group with laparoscopic nephrectomy (n = 40; 52,4 ± 5,1 years old; 16 males, 24 females). The control group was comprises from twenty subjects without urological pathology, 22–58 years old, 10 males, 10 females. Laboratory parameters of endotoxicosis, lipid peroxidation, kidney functional status, partial kidney functions, and urinary syndrome were assessed on the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 10th days after the surgery.

RESULTS: The early postoperative period of nephrectomy in renal cell cancer is accompanied by the development of endotoxicosis, activation of lipid peroxidation, deterioration of the functional state of the remaining kidney, and the formation of chronic kidney disease. At the same time, both systemic indicators (toxicity index, as well as concentrations of medium-weight molecules, diene conjugates, malondialdehyde), and renal parameters (glomerular filtration rate, albumin-creatinine ratio) are associated with the method of surgery: with a laparoscopic approach, changes in these indicators are reversible and less pronounced than with open nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the advantage of laparoscopic nephrectomy compared to open nephrectomy in patients with renal cell cancer.

About the authors

Sergey V. Popov

Clinical Hospital of St. Luke; Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: doc.popov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2767-7153
SPIN-code: 3830-9539

Doc. Sci. (Med.), urologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Ruslan G. Guseinov

Clinical Hospital of St. Luke; Saint Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: rusfa@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9935-0243
SPIN-code: 4222-4601
Scopus Author ID: 57209859097

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Konstantin V. Sivak

Clinical Hospital of St. Luke; Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza

Email: kvsivak@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4064-5033
SPIN-code: 7426-8322

Dr. Sci. (Biol.), leading research associate

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Vitaliy V. Perepelitsa

Clinical Hospital of St. Luke

Email: perepelitsa_vit@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7656-4473
SPIN-code: 7445-1996
Scopus Author ID: 14823999900

Cand. Sci. (Med.), urologist

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Nikolai S. Bunenkov

Clinical Hospital of St. Luke; Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University; Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Email: bunenkov2006@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4331-028X
SPIN-code: 3611-1290

Cand. Sci. (Med.), surgeon

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Anna S. Ulitina

Clinical Hospital of St. Luke; Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University

Email: anna.s.ulitina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3011-1812
SPIN-code: 3895-7799

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Menshakov YaN, Seregin VS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after intra-arterial embolization of a kidney tumor. Studencheskii. 2021;(1–2):45–48. (In Russ.)
  2. Nasrullayev MN, Nasrullayev MM, Nasrullayev MM. Laparoscopic surgeries for renal tumors. The bulletin of contemporary clinical medicine. 2021;14(1):38–40. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20969/VSKM.2021.14(1).38-40
  3. Boyko EV, Tillyashaykhova RM, Khasanov ShT. Surgical management of recurrences of renal cell carcinoma. Novosti Khirurgii. 2021;29(2):234–241. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18484/2305–0047.2021.2.234
  4. Malthouse T, Kasivisvanathan V, Raison N, et al. The future of partial nephrectomy. Int J Surg. 2016;36(C):560–567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.
  5. Hanaliev BV, Tevlin KP, Kosarev EI, et al. Tactics of managing the patient with posturumatic rupture of the right kidney. Bulletin of Pirogov national medical and surgical center. 2021;16(1):175–177. (In Russ.)
  6. Kulchenko NG. Treatment of localized renal cancer. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2020;1(1):69–75. (In Russ.) doi: 10.37748/2687-0533-2020-1-1-6
  7. Rodríguez-Monsalve M, Del Pozo Jiménez G, Carballido J, Castillón Vela I. The role of intraoperatory ultrasound in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for intrarenal tumors. Arch Esp Urol. 2019;72(8):729–737. (In Spanish)
  8. Shormanov IS, Los MS, Kosenko MV, Shormanova NS. Pathomorphology of adaptive changes in the remaining kidney in the early postoperative period after nephrectomy. Urology reports (St. Petersburg). 2020;10(1):19–24. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/uroved10119-24
  9. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6(7):655-663. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198210000-0000
  10. Kadyrov ZA, Odylov AYu. Complications of open, laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in various kidney diseases. Urologiia. 2020;(4):151–156. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18565/urology.2020.4.151-156
  11. Pearson J, Williamson T, Ischia J, et al. National nephrectomy registries: Reviewing the need for population-based data. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(9):607–613. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.607

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of endotoxicosis markers in blood in patients after open and laparoscopic nephrectomy. *statistically significant difference from the norm; #statistically significant difference from the 1st group

Download (131KB)
3. Fig. 2. Dynamics of lipid peroxidation products in blood in patients after open and laparoscopic nephrectomy. *Statistically significant difference from the norm; #statistically significant difference from the 1st group

Download (151KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dynamics of parameters of kidney function status in blood in patients after open and laparoscopic nephrectomy. *Statistically significant difference from the norm; #statistically significant difference from the 1st group

Download (125KB)
5. Fig. 4. Dynamics of glomerular filtration rate (mL/min) in patients after open and laparoscopic nephrectomy. *Statistically significant difference from the norm; #statistically significant difference from the 1st group

Download (39KB)
6. Fig. 5. Dynamics of urine albumin-creatinine ratio (mg / gram) in patients after open and laparoscopic nephrectomy. *Statistically significant difference from the norm; #statistically significant difference from the 1st group

Download (42KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies