Characteristics of professional adaptation of correctional school teachers

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Training and education of children with physical and mental health problems makes a number of requirements for teachers working in various correctional medical institutions. These specialists must have a high level of adaptive characteristics allowing combining up-to-date pedagogical methodology with individual approach, taking into account the current state of the child. As a result of applying complex experimental psychological techniques we managed to identify specific features of correctional teachers’ adaptive characteristics (when comparing with public school teachers), namely: low level of activity and optimism, insufficient adaptive strategy to cope with stress characterizing maladaptive personality types. There were also a lot of negative organizational factors affecting the process and result of professional activity: a lot of work, unauthorized persons at the lessons, interaction problems with parents, insufficiency of pupils’ independent work, need for individual explanation, lack of real results in teacher’s activity. Teachers working in correctional schools and having an average level of social and psychological adaptation give a lower evaluation of various aspects in professional activity. They have a pronounced value of psychological and physiological professional maladjustment shown in somatic, emotional and social spheres as well as motivation decrease in their professional activity. Correctional school teachers have a high degree of professional burnout and their emotional exhaustion and depersonalization are more pronounced.

About the authors

Nataliia V. Kosina

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: navico@mail.ru

PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Anna V. Radkevich

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: navico@mail.ru

Student, Department of Clinical Psychology

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Агавелян Р.О. Социально-перцептивные особенности личности педагога специальной коррекционной школы в профессиональной деятельности: Монографическое исследование. – Новосибирск: НИПКиПРО, 1999. – 401 с. [Agavelyan RO. Sotsial’no-pertseptivnye osobennosti lichnosti pedagoga spetsial’noy korrektsionnoy shkoly v professional’noy deyatel’nosti: Monograficheskoe issledovanie. Novosibirsk: NIPKiPRO; 1999. 401 p. (In Russ.)]
  2. Артемьева Т.В. Исследование копинг-стратегий педагогов в профессиональной деятельности // Образование и саморазвитие. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 79–82. [Artem’eva TV. Issledovanie koping-strategiy pedagogov v professional’noy deyatel’nosti. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie. 2014;(4):79-82. (In Russ.)]
  3. Василенко А. Ю. Личностные факторы эмоционального выгорания педагогов // Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. Серия: Педагогика, психология. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 66–69. [Vasilenko AYu. Personality Factors Of Emotional Burnout Of Educationalists. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya. 2011;(3):66-69. (In Russ.)]
  4. Водопьянова Н.Е. Психодиагностика стресса. – СПб.: Питер, 2009. – 336 с. [Vodop’yanova NE. Psikhodiagnostika stressa. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2009. 336 p. (In Russ.)]
  5. Гнедова С.Б. Особенности синдрома «эмоционального выгорания» у специалистов коррекционно-развивающего обучения. В кн.: Проблемы исследования синдрома «выгорания» и пути его коррекции у специалистов «помогающих» профессий (в медицинской, психологической и педагогической практике): сборник научных статей. – Курск, 2007. – С. 35–38. [Gnedova SB. Osobennosti sindroma «emotsional’nogo vygoraniya» u spetsialistov korrektsionno-razvivayushchego obucheniya. In: Problemy issledovaniya sindroma «vygoraniya» i puti ego korrektsii u spetsialistov «pomogayushchikh» professiy (v meditsinskoy, psikhologicheskoy i pedagogicheskoy praktike): sbornik nauchnykh statey. Kursk; 2007. P. 35-38. (In Russ.)]
  6. Дмитриев М.Г., Белов В.Г., Парфенов Ю.А. Психолого-педагогическая диагностика делинквентного поведения у трудных подростков. – СПб.: ПОНИ, 2010. – 316 с. [Dmitriev MG, Belov VG, Parfenov YuA. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskaya diagnostika delinkventnogo povedeniya u trudnykh podrostkov. Saint Petersburg: PONI; 2010. 316 p. (In Russ.)]
  7. Калашникова М.Б., Широкова Ю.С. Особенности копинг-стратегий педагогов // Психология обучения. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 71–81. [Kalashnikova MB, Shirokova YuS. Osobennosti koping-strategiy pedagogov. Psikhologiya obucheniya. 2010;(1):71-81. (In Russ.)]
  8. Куприянова И.Е., Дашиева Б.А. Качество жизни и психическое здоровье педагогов, работающих в различных системах образования (общее, коррекционное, инклюзивное) // Вестник Томского государственного педагогического университета. – 2013. – № 11. – С. 87–93. [Kupriyanova IE, Dashieva BA. Quality of life and mental health of teachers working in different educational systems (general, special, inclusive). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2013;(11):87-93. (In Russ.)]
  9. Недуруева Т.В., Павлова Л.Е. Особенности коммуникативных установок и совладающего поведения врачей-педиатров в ситуации лечебного взаимодействия // Коллекция гуманитарных исследований. – 2019. – № 1. – С. 34–39. [Nedurueva TV, Pavlova LE. Communicative installations and coping behavior of pediatres in the situation of medical cooperation. Kollektsiya gumanitarnykh issledovaniy. 2019;(1):34-39. (In Russ.)]
  10. Осадчая Е.А. Особенности копинг-стратегий педагогов // Молодой ученый. – 2018. – № 30. – С. 154–157. [Osadchaya EA. Osobennosti koping-strategiy pedagogov. Molodoy uchenyy. 2018;(30):154-157. (In Russ.)]
  11. Полтарыхин А.Л. Развитие обучения персонала и оценка эффективности // Научные записки ОрелГИЭТ. – 2016. – № 6. – С. 17–19. [Poltarykhin AL. Development Of Personnel Training And Efficiency Estimation. Nauchnye zapiski OrelGIET. 2016;(6):17-19. (In Russ.)]
  12. Русакова Е.И. Психологическая технология преодоления профессиональной дезадаптации учителя // Педагогическое образование в России. – 2011. – № 2. – С. 95–102. [Rusakova EI. Psychological technology of overcoming teacher’s professional desadaptation. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 2011;(2):95-102. (In Russ.)]
  13. Холлас Т., Койн Д., Поттер Д.П. Исследование условий труда школьных учителей естественных наук // Концепт. Научно-методический электронный журнал. – 2016. – № 1. – С. 91–95. [Hollas T, Koyn D, Potter DP. Issledovanie usloviy truda shkol’nykh uchiteley estestvennykh nauk. Kontsept. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal. 2016;(1):91-95. (In Russ.)]
  14. Bachkirova T. Teacher Stress and Personal Values. Sch Psychol Int. 2016;26(3):340-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034305055978.
  15. Clipa O. Teacher Stress and Coping Strategies. In: Proceedings of the 15th Edition of the International Conference on Sciences of Education, Studies and Current Trends in Science of Education, ICSED2017; Suceava, Romania, 9–10 Jun 2017. LUMEN Proceedings; 2017. P. 120-128. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.icsed2017.14.
  16. Folkman S, Lasarus R. Manual for Ways Coping Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1988.
  17. Heim Е. Koping und Adaptivited: Gibt es Geeignetes Oder Ungeeignetes Koping? Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1988;38(1):8-I7.
  18. Maslach C. The Cost of Caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1982.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Personality characteristics of teachers: a – teachers of correctional school, b – teachers of public school

Download (108KB)
3. Fig. 2. Teachers’ coping strategies. Type of coping strategies: * p ≤ 0.05

Download (98KB)
4. Fig. 3. Teachers’ attitude to various professional factors. Statistical significance: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01

Download (124KB)
5. Fig. 4. Features of psychological and physiological professional maladjustment of teachers. Statistical significance: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01

Download (125KB)
6. Fig. 5. Features of professional burnout. Statistical significance: * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01

Download (105KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Kosina N.V., Radkevich A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies