Justification of Choice of Thromboprophylaxis Method in Patients with High-Risk Surgical Profile: A Literature Review

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolic complications (VTEC) such as deep and subcutaneous vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are the most important clinical problems in many specialties. High-risk factors for thrombus formation include surgical interventions leading to the activation of the hemostatic system. Despite the existing international and Russian clinical recommendations on the treatment and prophylaxis of VTEC containing a detailed description of the methods and algorithms of prophylaxis in patients with different nosologies including patients with polymorbidities, the incidence of VTEC remains high. In the scientific community, there is a continuing discussion of the effectiveness of various approaches to VTEC prophylaxis in different clinical groups of patients. Algorithms available prescribe anticoagulants at standard doses and combinations. However, in patients with comorbidities, isolated conservative anticoagulant therapy may be insufficient for effective VTEC prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION: Currently, there is a need to improve the algorithms of VTEC prophylaxis in patients with comorbid pathologies to elaborate clear indications for the use of both pharmacological and mechanical prevention methods and their combinations.

About the authors

Igor’ I. Katel’nitskiy

Rostov State Medical University

Email: katelnizkji@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3745-9064
SPIN-code: 3583-6234

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Maksim V. Nemirovich

Rostov State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nemiroich.maxim@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3797-4007
SPIN-code: 4558-4041
Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Igor’ I. Prostov

Rostov State Medical University

Email: igor-prostov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7853-6775
SPIN-code: 5706-3190

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Ekaterina S. Livadnyaya

Rostov State Medical University

Email: livadnyaya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1148-1044
SPIN-code: 2252-5492

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. Vatutin NT, Taradin GG, Iofe EI, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis. The review of 2018 joint consensus document from the European society of cardiology. Bulletin of Urgent and Recovery Surgery. 2019;4(4):38–52. (In Russ).
  2. Somonova OV, Elizarova AL, Blindar VN, et al. Low molecular weight heparin enixum in the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in oncology clinic. Pacific Medical Journal. 2019;(1):56–60. (In Russ). doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2019.1.56-60
  3. Ptushkin VV. Prevention of thrombothic complications in cancer patients in high-risk groups. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2017;(6):88–92. (In Russ). doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2017-6-88-92
  4. Somonova OV, Teodorovich SL, Elizarova AL, et al. Thrombotic complications in patients with kidney cancer and their prevention. Tekhnologii Zhivykh Sistem. 2019;16(4):5–15. (In Russ). doi: 10.18127/j20700997-201904-01
  5. Fedotkina YuA, Panchenko EP. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic complications in patients with active oncological disease, receiving medical anti-cancer chemotherapy in outpatient conditions. Role of apixaban. Aterotromboz. 2019;(2):46–54. (In Russ). doi: 10.21518/2307-1109-2019-2-46-54
  6. Agnelli G, Becattini C, Meyer G, et al.; Caravaggio Investigators. Apixaban for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382(17):1599–607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915103
  7. Faraoni D, Comes RF, Geerts W, et al. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Neurosurgery. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2018;35(2):90–5. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000710
  8. Fokin AA, Bagaev KV. Venous thromboembolic complications in oncological patients: present-day possibilities of effective and safe anticoagulant therapy. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2019;25(1):19–23. (In Russ). doi: 10.33529/angio2019102
  9. Felder S, Rasmussen MS, King R, et al. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. The Cochrane Database System Reviews. 2019;8(8):CD004318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004318.pub5
  10. Chi G, Goldhaber SZ, Kittelson JM, et al. Effect of extended — duration thromboprophylaxis on venous thromboembolism and major bleeding among acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: a bivariate analysis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2017;15(10):1913–22. doi: 10.1111/jth.13783
  11. Somonova OV, Madzhuga AV, Elizarova AL, et al. Fraksiparin v profilaktike tromboticheskikh oslozhneniy u onkoginekologicheskikh bol'nykh. Sovremennaya Onkologiya. 2008;10(1):53–7. (In Russ).
  12. Wang Y, Wang M, Ni Y, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer. Hematology. 2020;25(1):63–70. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2020.1719726
  13. Felder S, Rasmussen MS, King R, et al. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. The Cochrane Database System Reviews. 2019;3(3):CD004318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004318.pub4
  14. Felder S, Rasmussen MS, King R, et al. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. The Cochrane Database System Reviews. 2018;11(11):CD004318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004318.pub3
  15. Ferreira D, de Sousa JA, Felicíssimo P, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the Portuguese hospital care setting: The ARTE study. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia. 2017;36(11):823–30. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.01.009
  16. Franco Moreno AI, Gutiérrez LC, Navarro MJG. Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Medicina Clinica. 2019;153(3):122–5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2019.01.002
  17. Franco-Moreno A, Cabezón-Gutiérrez L, Palka-Kotlowsa M, et al. Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer — associated thrombosis: an update. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2019;47(3):409–19. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1783-2
  18. Guéroult AM, Machin M, Lawton R, et al. What does the future hold for mechanical thromboprophylaxis? Phlebology. 2021;36(4):257–9. doi: 10.1177/0268355520975599
  19. Gulizia Chairperson MM, Parrini Co-Chairperson I, Colivicchi Co-Chairperson F, et al. HCF-ANMCO/AICPR/GIEC/ITAHFA/SICOA/SICP/ SIMG/SIT Cardiological Societies Council Consensus document: Anticoagulant therapy in venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation of the patient with cancer. Current knowledge and new evidence. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia. 2020;21(9):687–738. doi: 10.1714/3413.33967
  20. Guo Q, Huang B, Zhao J, et al. Perioperative Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery. 2017;265(6):1087–93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002074
  21. Hirmerová J. Anticoagulation therapy in cancer associated thromboembolism — new studies, new guidelines. Vnitrni Lekarstvi. 2020;66(4):225–31.
  22. Jimenez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Calderon C, et al. FOTROCAN Delphi consensus statement regarding the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis in areas of uncertainty and low quality of evidence. Clinical & Translational Oncology. 2017;19(8):997–1009. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1632-3
  23. Jung YJ, Seo HS, Park CH, et al. Venous Thromboembolism Incidence and Prophylaxis Use After Gastrectomy Among Korean Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma: The PROTECTOR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery. 2018;153(10):939–46. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2081
  24. Kanitra J, Holtrop J, Jawad A, et al. Extended duration chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism following abdominopelvic oncologic surgery. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2020;50(1): 190–4. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-02002-9
  25. Kim BJ, Day RW, Davis CH, et al. Extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in oncologic liver surgery is safe and effective. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2017;15(11):2158–64. doi: 10.1111/jth.13814
  26. Kramer V, Klein M, Cevallos F, et al. Caracterización de pacientes hospitalizados con neoplasia activa y diagnóstico de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa mediante la puntuación de Khorana en el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer. Revista Medica de Chile. 2016;144(5):593–7. (In Spanish). doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872016000500006
  27. Lewis TC, Cortes J, Altshuler D, et al. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A Narrative Review With a Focus on the High-Risk Critically Ill Patient. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2019;34(11–12):877–88. doi: 10.1177/0885066618796486
  28. Mukkamala A, Montgomery JR, De Roo AC, et al. Population-Based Analysis of Adherence to Postdischarge Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Colorectal Resection. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2020;63(7):911–7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001650
  29. Nozawa H, Shinagawa T, Kawai K, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer patients treated with chronic anti-thrombotic therapy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2018;32(8):3509–16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6071-x
  30. Rausa E, Kelly ME, Asti E, et al. Extended versus conventional thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Surgery. 2018;164(6):1234–40. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.028
  31. Pfliegler G. A vénás tromboembólia (VTE) korszerû diagnosztikája és kezelése — különös tekintettel az onkológiai betegekre. Magyar Onkológia. 2017;61(3):267–74. (In Hungarian).
  32. Wang Y, Wang M, Ni Y, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer. Hematology. 2020;25(1):63–70. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2020.1719726
  33. Rashid MF, Jackson TL, Morgan JA, et al. Dabigatran (Pradaxa) Is Safe for Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2019;23(6):1166–71. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3936-1
  34. Skertich NJ, Gerard J, Poirier J, et al. Do All Abdominal Neuroendocrine Tumors Require Extended Postoperative VTE Prophylaxis? A NSQIP Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2019;23(4):788–93. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04075-y
  35. Tanaka Y, Yamada A, Hirata S, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin for Prophylaxis of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism After Esophagectomy: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Phase II Study. Anticancer Research. 2019;39(5):2615–25. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13385
  36. Trepanier M, Alhassan N, Sabapathy CA, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery from a Canadian Health Care System Perspective. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2019;62(11):1381–9. doi: 10.1097/DCR. 0000000000001438
  37. Venclauskas L, Llau JV, Jenny JY, et al. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Day surgery and fast-track surgery. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2018;35(2):134–8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000706
  38. Portillo Sánchez J. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism disease in patients with cancer. Revista Clinica Española. 2020;220(Suppl 1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2020.04.018

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Katel’nitskiy I.I., Nemirovich M.V., Prostov I.I., Livadnyaya E.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies