Carotid Cross-Clamp intolerance during carotid endarterectomy in regional anesthesia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

During surgical endarterectomy, carotid cross clamping is needed for arteriotomy and plaque removal. Carotid cross clamping reduces the blood flow to the circle of Willis, and some patients show intolerance to the temporary occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA).

Aim. This study demonstrates locoregional anesthesia’s safety in patients with carotid cross clamping intolerance (CCI) and the risk factors that predict this condition.

Materials and Methods. All patients who underwent surgical carotid endarterectomy between January 2019 and December 2020 (n=53, 29 were male, age (median with range) – 78 (56-90) years) were identified in a retrospective review. The indication for surgical treatment was made for a stenosed ICA of 70-99% or in the case of symptomatic stenosis.

Surgical technique. An incision is made at the front edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The common carotid artery (CCA) is identified and isolated from the surrounding tissues with sharp dissection and continued toward the bifurcation. Next, the internal and external carotid arteries can be isolated. Heparin (5000 U) is administrated intravenously, and the systolic arterial pressure is increased and kept over 160 mm Hg. In the next step, the cross clamping tolerance test is performed for 60 s. During clamping, the patient is neurologically meticulously observed. In the case of CCI, the operation proceeds with the insertion of a temporary shunt. The arteriotomy is started in the CCA and continues to the ICA. The plaque is completely removed, and the arteriotomy incision is covered with a patch. Before completing the suture, the clamps are partially removed to flush out the debris using the blood flow. Now, the external and common artery can be released. Finally, the clamp of the ICA can be removed.

Results. Eight patients had cross clamping tolerance test intolerance. In all these cases, the surgical procedure was continued with a shunt. The further operation course remained uncomplicated. The in-hospital mortality was nil, and a transient ischemic attack occurred in only one case.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) [odds ratio (OR) 12.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-112.50], a history of cerebrovascular events [OR 10.50, 95% CI 1.83-60.30], and contralateral stenosis of 70% or more [OR 26.66, 95% CI 2.29-304.37] presented a significant association with the CCI and the need to shunt. The remaining factors showed no significant association with intolerance.

Conclusions. Regional anesthesia is a safe method for identifying patients with CCI and safely performing the surgical procedure. Contralateral stenosis of the ICA and a history of cerebrovascular events are significant factors to predict CCI.

About the authors

Payman Majd

Evangelical Hospital Bergisch Gladbach

Email: mir.majd@uk-koeln.de
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5835-8318

Chief physician, Specialist in surgery, Specialist in vascular surgery, Endovascular surgeon

Germany, Bergisch Gladbach North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Peter Galkin

Evangelical Hospital Bergisch Gladbach

Email: p.galkin@uk-koeln.de
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2666-5337

Senior physician Dr. Med., Specialist in vascular surgery

Germany, Bergisch Gladbach North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Mahmoud Tayeh

Evangelical Hospital Bergisch Gladbach

Email: m.tayeh@uk-koeln.de
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5460-8562

Assistant Doctor

Germany, Bergisch Gladbach North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Thomas Herzmann

Evangelical Hospital Bergisch Gladbach

Email: t.herzmann@uk-koeln.de
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7442-9825

Senior physician
Specialist in surgery, Specialist in vascular surgery, Endovascular surgeon (DGG)
Germany, Bergisch Gladbach North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Michael Gores

Evangelical Hospital Bergisch Gladbach

Email: m.gores@uk-koeln.de
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1015-3698

Senior physician, Specialist in anesthesiology, Special anesthesiological intensive medicine, emergency
medicine
Germany, Bergisch Gladbach North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Egan Kalmykov

Evangelical Hospital Bergisch Gladbach

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@helios-international.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6784-2243

MD, PhD

Germany, Bergisch Gladbach North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Wael Ahmad

University Hospital of Cologne

Email: wael.ahmad@uk-koeln.de
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5090-3468

Dr, Personal assistant medical, endovascular surgeon
Germany, Cologne North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

References

  1. Bagan P, Vidal R, Martinod E, et al. Cerebral ischemia during carotid artery cross-clamping: predictive value of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2006;20(6): 747-52. doi: 10.1007/s10016-006-9126-8
  2. ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/ CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive summary. Catheterization & Cardiovascular Interventions. 2013;81(1):E76-123. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22983
  3. Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, et al. Editor's Choice – Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2018;55(1):3-81. doi:10.1016/ j.ejvs.2017.06.021
  4. Kalmykov EL, Matoussevitch V, Brunkwall J. Letter to editor. Longitudinal and transverse access for carotid endarterectomy. Commentary and invitation to discussion. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2019;3(2):34-6. doi:10.17116/ operhirurg2019302134
  5. Paraskevas KI, Kalmykov EL, Naylor AR. Stroke/ Death Rates Following Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Contemporary Admin-istrative Dataset Registries: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2016;51(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.032
  6. Ahmad W, Deeb H, Otto C, et al. Long-term out-comes of open and endovascular treatment of recurrent carotid artery stenosis – a 16-year retrospective single centre case series. Vasa. 2020;49(1):23-9. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000824
  7. Piffaretti G, Tarallo A, Franchin M, et al. Out-come Analysis of Carotid Cross-Clamp Intolerance during Carotid Endarterectomy under Locoregional Anesthesia. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2017; 43:249-57. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.11.024
  8. Montisci R, Sanfilippo R, Bura R, et al. Status of the circle of Willis and intolerance to carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2013;45(2):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.11.012
  9. Myrcha P, Lewczuk A, Jakuciński M, et al. The Anatomy of the Circle of Willis Is Not a Strong Enough Predictive Factor for the Prognosis of Cross-Clamping Intolerance during Carotid Endarterectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9(12): 3913. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123913
  10. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet. 1998;351(9113):1379-87.
  11. Lutz H-J, Michael R, Gahl B, et al. Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy – improving the gold standard? European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2008;36(2): 145-9;
  12. discussion 150-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.03.009
  13. Harky A, Chan JSK, Kot TKM, et al. General Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2020;34(1):219-34. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca. 2019.03.029
  14. Kretz B, Abello N, Astruc K, et al. Influence of the contralateral carotid artery on carotid surgery out-come. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2012;26(6):766-74. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.12.009

Copyright (c) 2021 Majd P., Herzmann T., Galkin P., Tayeh M., Gores M., Ahmad W., Kalmykov E.


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies