Consanguineous marriage as socio-medical problem

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Despite the availability of a large amount of scientific data on the negative impact of consanguineous marriages on the health of children born in such families, the significance of this problem is not decreasing in a number of countries.

Aim. Analysis of the modern scientific base on the problem of consanguineous marriages, assessment of their impact on the development of a particular pathology in children.

The article reflects the position of modern clinical recommendations, the results of recent studies, and some controversial and unresolved issues. Despite the emerging trend of declining consanguineous marriages in recent decades, this problem involves at least 20% of the population and dozens of countries around the world. The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in the world varies significantly, ranging from 0.1-0.4% in the United States and European countries to more than 50% in North Africa, the Middle East and West Asia. The most common form of consanguineous marriage is a marriage between first cousins. In general, rural residents who have a lower level of education are more likely to enter into consanguineous marriages.

Conclusion. Despite a number of positive social and economic aspects of consanguineous marriages, from the point of view of genetics and medicine, it is necessary to take into account the negative impact of consanguineous marriages, which consists in an increased genetic risk to offspring and a high incidence of congenital pathology in newborns. An assessment of the socio-demographic aspects of consanguineous marriages shows that their greater prevalence is often due to poor economic conditions, lack of education, and low social security.

About the authors

Oksana B. Bobdjonova

Ibn Sina Tadjik State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: Oksana.gynectj@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1830-6417
SPIN-code: 7905-7643

PhD-student of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2

Tajikistan, Dushanbe

Firuza M. Abdurakhmanova

Ibn Sina Tadjik State Medical University

Email: Oksana.gynectj@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6693-0337
SPIN-code: 5392-3408

MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology №2

Tajikistan, Dushanbe

References

  1. Ivanov AG. Medical and social ways of improving reproduction potential of young people. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2004;(3-4): 105-7. (In Russ).
  2. Moskovkina AG, Orlova NI; Seliverstov VI, editor. Kliniko-geneticheskiye osnovy detskoy defektologii. Moscow: GIS VLADOS; 2015. (In Russ).
  3. Lefranc M-P, Lefranc G. Consanguinity. In: Brenner's Encyclopedia of Genetics. 2nd ed. 2013:158-62. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374984-0.00324-7
  4. Bowirrat A, Armaly Z. Consanguineous Marriages in the Middle East: Nature Versus Nurture. The Open Complementary Medicine Journal. 2013;5:1-10. doi: 10.2174/1876391X01305010001
  5. Christianson AN, Howson CP, Modell B. March of dimes. Global report on birth defects. New York; 2006.
  6. Panfilova TN, Medvedeva OV. Thе family as an object of the modern demographic policy. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2009;17(2):67-70. (In Russ).
  7. Hamamy H. Consanguineous Marriages Preconception Consultation in Primary Health Care Settings. Journal of Community Genetics. 2012;3(3):185-92. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0072-y
  8. Hussain R, Bittles AH. Sociodemographic correlates of consanguineous marriage in the Muslim population of India. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2000; 32(4):433-42. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000004338
  9. Saleem M, Shankar K, Sabeetha K. A population-based cross-sectional study on consanguineous marriages in rural Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2016; 5(04):730-4. doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2016.20112015221
  10. Bellad MB, Goudar SS, Edlavitch SA, et al. Consanguinity, prematurity, birth weight and pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study at four primary health center areas of Karnataka, India. Journal of Perinatology. 2012;32:431-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.115
  11. Naidu YJM, Mascie-Taylor CGN. Consanguinity and its relationship to differential fertility and mortality in the Kotia: a tribal population of Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1997;29(2): 171-80. doi: 10.1017/s0021932097001715
  12. Saify K, Saadat M. Consanguineous marriages in Afghanistan. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2012;44(1): 73-81. doi: 10.1017/S0021932011000253
  13. Tunçbílek E, Koç I. Consanguineous marriage in Turkey and its impact on fertility and mortality. Annals of Human Genetics. 1994;58(4):321-9. doi:10.1111/ j.1469-1809.1994.tb00729.x
  14. Kaplan S, Pinar G, Kaplan B, et al. The prevalence of consanguineous marriages and affecting factors in Turkey: a national survey. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2016;48(5):616-30. doi: 10.1017/s0021932016000055
  15. Yamamah G, Abdel-Raouf EM, Talaat A, et al. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in South Sinai, Egypt. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2013; 45(1):31-9. doi: 10.1017/s002193201200020x
  16. Hosseini-Chavoshi M, Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Bittles AH. Consanguineous marriage, reproductive behavior and postnatal mortality in contemporary Iran. Human Heredity. 2014;77(1-4):16-25. doi: 10.1159/000358403
  17. Al-Arrayed S, Hamamy H. The changing profile of consanguinity rates in Bahrain, 1990-2009. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2012;44(3):313-9. doi:10.1017/ s0021932011000666
  18. Islam MM, Ababneh FM, Khan MDHR. Consanguineous marriage in Jordan: an update. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2018;50(4):573-8. doi:10.1017/ s0021932017000372
  19. Assaf S, Khawaja M. Consanguinity trends and correlates in the Palestinian Territories. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2009;41(1):107-24. doi:10.1017/ s0021932008002940
  20. Islam MM. Effects of consanguineous marriage on reproductive behavior, adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring mortality in Oman. Annals of Human Biology. 2013;40(3):243-55. doi: 10.3109/03014460. 2012.760649
  21. Bener A, Mohammad RR. Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: genetic disorders from an endogamous population. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2017; 18(4):315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmhg.2017.01.002
  22. Nouri N-s, Nouri N-h, Tirgar S, et al. Consanguineous marriages in the genetic counseling centers of Isfahan and the ethical issues of clinical consultations. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 2017;10:1-10.
  23. Gunaid AA, Hummad NA, Tamim KA. Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana’a, Yemen. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2004;36(1):111-21. doi: 10.1017/s0021932003006138
  24. Al Ali KA. Consanguinity and associated socio-demographic factors in Qatari population. Qatar Medical Journal. 2005;14(1):16-9. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2005.1.9
  25. Barbour B, Salameh P. Consanguinity in Lebanon: prevalence, distribution and determinants. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2009;41(4):505-17. doi:10.1017/ s0021932009003290
  26. Othman H, Saadat M. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2009; 41(5):685-92. doi: 10.1017/S0021932009003411
  27. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Mcdonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M. Modernization or cultural maintenance: the practice of consanguineous marriage in Iran. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2008;40(6):911-33. doi: 10.1017/s0021932008002782
  28. Jurdi R, Saxena PC. The prevalence and correlates of consanguineous marriages in Yemen: similarities and contrasts with other Arab countries. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2003;35(1):1-13. doi:10.1017/ s0021932003000014
  29. Panahian VM. System of preventive maintenance and early of congenital defects and hereditary diseases in otorinolaryngology. Zhurnal Ushnykh, Nosovykh i Gorlovykh Bolezney. 2008;(6):32-6. (In Russ).
  30. Panakhian VM. Rasprostranennost’ i profilaktika vrozhdennykh i nasledstvennykh zabolevaniy LOR-organov v Azerbaydzhanskoy Respublike [dissertation]. Moscow; 2004. Available at: http://medical-diss.com/docreader/251210/a?#?page=36. Accessed: 2020 March 20. (In Russ).
  31. Valiyeva ST. A characteristic of medical and social factors of family lifestyles and organization of nutrition of children under 5 years of age in a rural area. Pediatric Nutrition. 2013;11(6):60-3. (In Russ).
  32. Garayeva SZ. Struktura i chastota krovnorodstvennykh brakov roditeley detey s zaderzhkoy vnutriutrobnogo razvitiya. In: III Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya «Meditsina i zdravookhraneniye»; may 2015. Kazan’: Buk; 2015. Available at: https://moluch.ru/conf/med/archive/ 154/8021/. Accessed: 2020 March 20. (In Russ).
  33. Seyidbekova FO. Estimation risk of development of innate vices factors on a city Baku. Mir Meditsiny i Biologii. 2015;(2):65-9.
  34. Akhmedova AR, Shamov IA, Bulaeva KB, et al. Studying marriage structure in ethnic populations of Dagestan and its relationship with epidemiology of iron deficiency anemia. Bulletin of the Dagestan State Medical Academy. 2013;(4):65-70. (In Russ).
  35. Inoyatov ASh, Saidova MA, Shodmonov KE. The analysis of factors of the congenital defects of maxillofacial area promoting development. Vestnik Soveta Molodykh Uchonykh i Spetsialistov Chelyabinskoy Oblasti. 2016;3(4):51-5. (In Russ).
  36. Khushvakova NZh. Clinical and genetic survey of congenital disorders associated with sensorineural bradyacuasia in the condition of panmixis and in-breeding. Vestnik Kazakhskogo Natsional’nogo Me-ditsinskogo Universiteta. 2014;(2-3):111-3. (In Russ).
  37. Radzhabaliyev SH. Epidemiologiya nervno-myshechnykh zabolevaniy v Tadzhikistane, diagnostika, metody lecheniya i profilaktika [dissertation]. Dushanbe; 1996. Available at: http://medical-diss.com/docreader/403039/a?#?page=1. Accessed: 2020 March 20. (In Russ).
  38. Rakhmonov RA, Madaminova TV. Hereditary diseases of the nervous system in the hissar district of Tajikistan. Avicenna Bulletin. 2014;(1):94-7. (In Russ).
  39. Kholmatov IB, Ochilzoda AA. Hearing loss of soil related to marriage as a factor in hereditary disease (literature review). Bulletin of the Kyrgyz State Medical Academy. IK Ahunbaeva. 2014;3(suppl 1):21-7. (In Russ).
  40. Mahmadjonov DM, Sultonov ShR, Sattorov AM. Diagnostics of complicated nephrolitiasis in children. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):47-50. (In Russ).2016. Т. 6, №1. С. 47-50.

Copyright (c) 2020 Bobdjonova O.B., Abdurakhmanova F.M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies