Influence of the quality of viscoelastic removal on phacoemulsification results. Part 2. Dependence of “IOL – posterior lens capsule” interface status on viscoelastic visualization

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

BACKGROUND: Main methods of intraoperative secondary cataract prevention are measures aimed at the formation of full contact of the intraocular lens (IOL) with the posterior capsule. The diastasis between the IOL and the posterior capsule is explained by the presence of viscoelastic in the interface. Maximum visualization of the stained viscoelastic will obviously make it possible to completely remove it from the eye, which will increase the number of eyes with the optimal “IOL – posterior capsule” interface with standard phacoemulsification.

AIM: The aim was to study “IOL – posterior capsule” interface status after phacoemulsification of senile cataract in relation to viscoelastic visualization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 122 eyes of 122 patients were included, which underwent phacoemulsification of senile cataract with femto-laser assistance and were divided into 2 groups depending on viscoelastic characteristic (colored or transparent) used for anterior chamber filling prior to IOL implantation. “IOL – posterior capsule” interface status was examined on the 1st and 7th day post-op in order to evaluate the contact between two structures.

RESULTS: On the 1st day post-op, the absence of contact between IOL and posterior capsule was noticed more often in the second group, the number of eyes with this type of interface was 1.5 times lower in the 1st group. On the 7th day after surgery, optimal interface had place in 9 out of 10 eyes in the 1st group, in comparison with 2/3 of patients from the second group.

CONCLUSION: Conducted investigation showed that the use of colored viscoelastic allowed creating the optimal “IOL – posterior capsule” interface on the 7th day post-op in 87% of eyes of the main group in comparison with 67% eyes from the control group (the difference is statistically significant). The absence of contact between IOL and capsule can be considered as relative capsule block, which may form the high risk of secondary cataract.

作者简介

Anna Egorova

S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: naukakhvmntk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7079-8359
SPIN 代码: 7161-7481
Scopus 作者 ID: 25631622800
Researcher ID: AAK-7969-2021

Cand. Sci. (Med.), MD, Ophnalmologist

俄罗斯联邦, 211, Tikhookeanskaya st., Khabarovsk, 680033

Alexey Vasiliev

S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution

Email: naukakhvmntk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9712-0276
SPIN 代码: 5780-0798
Researcher ID: AAK-7971-2021

Cand. Sci. (Med.), MD, Chief of Cataract Surgery Department

俄罗斯联邦, 211, Tikhookeanskaya st., Khabarovsk, 680033

Lina Bai

S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution

Email: naukakhvmntk@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0107-643X
SPIN 代码: 2005-4948
Researcher ID: AAK-8757-2021

Ophthalmologist

俄罗斯联邦, 211, Tikhookeanskaya st., Khabarovsk, 680033

参考

  1. Vasil’ev AV, Egorova AV, Egorov VV, Bai L. Analiz ehffektivnosti primeneniya metodiki pnevmokompressii IOL pri fakoehmul’sifikatsii v profilaktike razvitiya pomutnenii zadnei kapsuly khrustalika. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2017;(6):32–34. (In Russ.)
  2. Egorova EV. Anatomical and topographical relations between the posterior lens capsule and the intraocular lens in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018;15(2S):134–139. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2018-2S-134-139
  3. Bai L, Kolenko OV, Vasiliev AV, Egorova AV. Study of frequency and structure formation of secondary cataract at various types of IOL – posterior capsule interface in long term after cataract surgery. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2020;(2):47–51. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2020-1-47-51
  4. Bantcykina YuV, Malov IV, Eroshevskaya EB, Malov VM. Frequency, causes, pathogenesis, types, classifications, and clinical manifestations of a secondary cataract. Aspirantskii vestnik Povolzh’ya. 2018;(1–2): 145–152. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/2075-2354.2018.18.145-152
  5. Kolenko OV, Pshenichnov MV, Kravchenko IZ, et al. Izuchenie chastoty, kharaktera i srokov formirovaniya pomutneniya zadnei kapsuly khrustalika posle ehkstraktsii katarakty metodom fakoehmul’sifikatsii. Proceedings of the International Сongress “Dokazatel’naya meditsina – osnova sovremennogo zdravookhraneniya”. Khabarovsk: Red.-izd. tsentr IPKSZ, 2011. P. 94–96. (In Russ.)
  6. Fabrikantov OL, Shutova SV, Aryasov AS, Goydin AP. The probability of secondary cataract development followed phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2015;(3):6–12. (In Russ.)
  7. Kovalevskaya MA, Filina LA, Kokorev VL. Factors of the risk of developing a secondary cataract and recommendations for conducting a primary posterior capsulorhexis. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2018;11(3):213–217. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18499/2070-478X-2018-11-3-213-217
  8. Bai L, Vasiliev AV, Egorova AV. Clinical and functional results of iol pneumocompression method implementation at phacoemulsification of senile cataract. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2019;(1):6–10. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25276/0235-4160-2019-1-6-10
  9. Takhchidi KhP, Zubarev AB. Surgical technique of cataract removal in zonule disorders. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2004;(4):16–18. (In Russ.)
  10. Zhao Y, Li J, Lu W, et al. Capsular adhesion to intraocular lens in highly myopic eyes evaluated in vivo using ultralong-scan-depth optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(3):484–491. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.019
  11. D’yachenko YuN, Kravchenko IZ, Pshenichnov MV, Sorokin EL. Kapsul’nyi blok – posleoperatsionnoe oslozhnenie fakoehmul’sifikatsii, klinicheskie proyavleniya, taktika. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2017;(3):290–292. (In Russ.)
  12. Malyugin BE, Verzin AA, Vlasenko AV. Capsular block syndrome as a complication of phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2015;(1):57–61. (In Russ.)
  13. Tao A, Lu P, Li J, et al. High resolution OCT quantitative analysis of the space between the IOL and the posterior capsule during the early cataract postoperative period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(10):6991–6997. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12849
  14. Polit F, Polit A. Patent blue mixed with sodium hyaluronate for capsulorhexis. J Ophthalmic Clin Res. 2016;(3):21. doi: 10.24966/OCR-8887/100021
  15. Yetik H, Devranoglu K, Ozkan S. Determining the lowest trypan blue concentration that satisfactorily stains the anterior capsule. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(6):988–991. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01217-8
  16. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):831–836. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035
  17. Lytvynchuk LM, Glittenberg CG, Falkner-Radler CI, et al. Evaluation of intraocular lens position during phacoemulsification using intraoperative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(5):694–702. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.044
  18. Anisimova NS, Anisimov SI, Anisimova SY. The variety of secondary changes of the posterior capsule of the lens after the implantation of different types of IOLs. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2015;(2):6–11. (In Russ.)
  19. Ortiz S, Perez-Merino P, Duran S, et al. Full OCT anterior segment biometry: an application in cataract surgery. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4(3):387–396. doi: 10.1364/BOE.4.000387

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Absence of contact between IOL and posterior lens capsule

下载 (102KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Incomplete contact between IOL and posterior lens capsule

下载 (96KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Full contact between IOL and posterior lens capsule

下载 (103KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Egorova A., Vasiliev A., Bai L., 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可
 


##common.cookie##