Quality of life study in ophthalmic practice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article discusses various methods for studying the quality of life in all kinds of eye diseases. General and special questionnaires used in modern ophthalmological practice are presented. The presence of a sufficiently large amount of data indicating the relationship between the quality of life and objective indicators of the visual system was established. A fairly good comparability of results obtained in the assessment of various quality of life questionnaires in a patient with ophthalmic condition was revealed.

About the authors

Igor G. Ovechkin

Academy of Postgraduate Education under the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Author for correspondence.
Email: doctoro@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3996-1012
SPIN-code: 8074-1879

MD, Dr. Sci (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, 91, Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125371,

Ekaterina I. Kovrigina

Ophthalmological Center of Karelia

Email: Dr.Kovrigina@eyes.mt

ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

Michail E. Konovalov

Academy of Postgraduate Education under the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: zenina@konovalov-eye-center.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3954-6233
SPIN-code: 2302-3493

Dr. Sci (Med).

Russian Federation, 91, Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125371

Vinod Kumar

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: Kumarvinod1955@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5489-4607
SPIN-code: 9287-6007

Dr. Sci (Med).

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Novik AA, Ionova TI. Otsenka kachestva zhizni bol’nogo v meditsine. Clinical Medicine. 2002;(2):10–12. (In Russ.)
  2. Terheyden JH, Finger RP. Vision-related Quality of Life with Low Vision — Assessment and Instruments. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2019;236(3):261–268. doi: 10.1055/a-0838-5810
  3. Davydov SV. Meditsinskie aspekty kachestva zhizni u bol’nykh gipertonicheskoi bolezn’yu. Kazan Medical Journal. 2001;82(1): 35–37. (In Russ.)
  4. Beloborodova EhI, Alekseeva AS, Lambrova EG, Filippova LP. Psikhosomaticheskie rasstroistva u bol’nykh s khronicheskimi zabolevaniyami pecheni. Sibirskii vestnik gastroehnterologii i gepatologii. 2006;20:134–137. (In Russ.)
  5. Sidorenko BA, Semenyuk OA, Bugrimova MA, et al. Mathematical model of the heart muscle functioning level estimation before coronary artery bypass surgery. Kuban scientific medical bulletin. 2015;(5): 109–113. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25207/1608-6228-2015-5-109-113
  6. Malyshev AV, Karapetov GYu, Semykin VD, et al. Methods for assessing the quality of life of the patient in ophthalmic practice. Sovremennaya optometriya. 2015;(7):34–39. (In Russ.)
  7. Bian W, Wan J, Smith G, et al. Domains of health-related quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study in the Chinese cultural context. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4): e018756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018756
  8. Assi L, Rosman L, Chamseddine F, et al. Eye health and quality of life: an umbrella review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8): e037648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037648
  9. Bian W, Wan J, Tan M, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life in Chinese patients receiving treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a prospective longitudinal study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01561-3
  10. Eskina EN, Belogurova AV, Stepanova MA. Clinical effectiveness of Nutrof Total supplement for dry age-related macular degeneration. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2016;9(2):90–95. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2016-9-2-90-95
  11. Ng H, Vermeer KA, van Meurs JC, La Heij EC. Visual Acuity Inadequately Reflects Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients After Macula-Off Retinal Detachment Surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(10):34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.10.34
  12. Loskutov IA. Results of Lucentis use as a routine practice in wet age-related macular degeneration patients. Ophthalmology journal. 2014;7(1):47–57. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV2014147-57
  13. Astakhov YS, Shaar GB, Dal’ NY. Influence of vitrectomyon the progressionof wet age related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology journal. 2014;7(4):13–21. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV2014413-21
  14. Zhuravleva LV. Otsenka kachestva zhizni bol’nykh vozrastnoi makulyarnoi degeneratsiei po rezul’tatam ikh lecheniya preparatom Lyutein forte. Russian Medical Journal. 2012;20(1):11–14. (In Russ.)
  15. Malyshev AV, Karapetov GIu. Effect of surgery on quality of life in patients with epiretinal membrane. The Russian annals of ophthalmology. 2015;131(1):30–35. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/oftalma2015131130-35
  16. Sergienko AA, Malyshev AV, Apostolova AS. The Main Patterns of Disorders of the Visual System in Patients with Retinal Detachment in Pediatric and Adult Practice in Terms of the Level of Antioxidant Protection. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(1):152–156. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-1-152-156
  17. Al-Rashid ZZ, Malyshev AV, Lysenko OI. Quality of life changes after surgical treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmology journal. 2014;7(2):23–29. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-1-152-156
  18. Queirós A. Quality of life of myopic subjects with different methods of visual correction using the NEI RQL-42 questionnaire. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(2):116–121. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182480e97
  19. Kirwan C, Lanigan B, O’Keefe MJ. Vision-related quality of life assessment using the NEI-VFQ-25 in adolescents and young adults with a history of congenital cataract. Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012;49(1):26–31. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20110517-02
  20. He L, Cui Y, Tang X, et al. Changes in visual function and quality of life in patients with senile cataract following phacoemulsification. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9(6):3802–3809. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1709
  21. Alchinova AS, Morina KY, Rakhmanov VV, et al. Comparison of visual function and patient satisfaction with AcrySof ReSTORSN6AD1 multifocal intraocular compared to monofocal intraocular lenses 5. Ophthalmology journal. 2016;9(4):5–12. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV20164
  22. Murdoch I, Smith AF, Baker H, et al. The cost and quality of life impact of glaucoma in Tanzania: An observational study. PLoS One. 2020;15(6): e0232796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232796
  23. Miraftabi A, Coleman AL, Nilforushan N, et al. Vision-related quality of life in patients with a history of congenital glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020. doi: 10.1177/1120672120977354
  24. Belikova EI, Sharova GA. A Personalized Approach to the Treatment of Patients with Latent Stage Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020;17(3s):566–571. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3S-566-571
  25. Panthier C, Moran S, Bourges JL. Evaluation of vision-related quality of life in keratoconus patients, and associated impact of keratoconus severity indicators. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(7):1459–1468. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04680-1
  26. Khabbazi A, Ebrahimzadeh Attari V, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Malek Mahdavi A. Quality of Life in Patients With Behçet Disease and Its Relation With Clinical Symptoms and Disease Activity. Reumatol Clin. 2021;17(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2019.03.002
  27. Steinberg J, Bußmann N, Frings A, et al. Quality of life in stable and progressive ‘early-stage’ keratoconus patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(2): e196–e201. doi: 10.1111/aos.14564
  28. Kochergin SA, Sergeeva ND. С The comparative analysis of indicators of quality of life and eyesight capacity among the patients after different types of eye mechanical injury. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2012;9(3):77–80. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2012-3-77-80
  29. Wilson MR, Sandberg KA, Foutch BK. Macular pigment optical density and visual quality of life. J Optom. 2021;14(1):92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.07.008
  30. Kishimoto F, Ohtsuki H. Comparison of VF-14 scores among different ophthalmic surgical interventions. Acta Med Okayama. 2012;66(2):101–110. doi: 10.18926/AMO/48260
  31. Boiko A.V., Syisoev V.N., Novik A.A., Kuzmitchova O.V. Quality of life and phsychological status of patients suffering from glaucoma and cataract. Glaucoma. 2010;(1):21–25. (In Russ.)
  32. Korotkikh SA, Grinev AG, Sviridova MB, Danilov AM. Development of Algorithm of Surgical Treatment Choice in Patients with Cataract and Asteroid Hyalosis. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020;17(3):361–367. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3-361-367
  33. Isakova IA, Dzhashi BG, Aksenov VP. Gendernyi priznak v udovletvorennosti patsientov rezul’tatami khirurgicheskogo lecheniya katarakty s implantatsiei mul’tifokal’noi IOL. Vestnik Orenburg State University. 2011;14(133):156–157. (In Russ.)
  34. McAlinden A, Gothwal V, Khadka J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2374–2381. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.008
  35. Lundström M, Pesudovs KJ. Questionnaires for measuring cataract surgery outcomes. Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(5):945–959. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.010
  36. Chatziralli IP, Sergentanis TN, Peponis VG, et al. Risk factors for poor vision-related quality of life among cataract patients. Evaluation of baseline data. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(3): 783–789. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2194-2
  37. Fraser ML. Vision, quality of life and depressive symptoms after first eye cataract surgery. Psychogeriatrics. 2013;46(9):16–18. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12028
  38. Azoulay-Sebban L, Zhao Z, Zenouda A, Lombardi M. Correlations Between Subjective Evaluation of Quality of Life, Visual Field Loss, and Performance in Simulated Activities of Daily Living in Glaucoma Patients. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(10):970–974. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001597
  39. Nelson P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O. Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(1): 139–150. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00009
  40. Janz NK, Wren PA, Lichter PR. Quality of life in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients: the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study patterns and correlates over time. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):2213–2220. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00624-2
  41. Tripop S, Pratheepawanit N, Asawaphureekorn S. Health Related Quality of Life Instruments for Glaucoma. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(1):26–28.
  42. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;8(5):769–777. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200410000-00009
  43. Garamendi E. The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling. Vision Res. 2006;46(8–9):1375–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.007
  44. Trubilin VN, Ovechkin IG, Pozharitsky MD, et al. The study of quality of life after excimer laser operations. Sovremennaya optometriya. 2012;5:38–43. (In Russ.)
  45. Ovechkin IG, Malyshev AV, Karapetov GYu, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2015;12(4): 75–79. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2016-4-265-272
  46. Kandel H, Watson SL. Quality-of-life researchers in ocular allergy may benefit from the newer methods. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(1):595–596. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.067
  47. Artesani MC, Esposito M, Sacchetti M, et al. Health-related quality of life in children at the diagnosis of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021. doi: 10.1111/pai.13520
  48. Proskurina OV, Tarutta EP, Iomdina EN, et al. A modern classification of asthenopias: clinical forms and stages. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2016;9(4):69–73. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2016-9-4-69-73
  49. Korotkikh SA, Nikiforova AA. Issledovanie nadezhnosti i validnosti ankety kolichestvennoi otsenki astenopicheskikh zhalob komp’yuternogo zritel’nogo sindroma. Sovremennaya optometriya. 2017;(8(108)):29–33. (In Russ.)
  50. González-Pérez M, Susi R, Antona B, et al. The Computer-Vision Symptom Scale (CVSS17): development and initial validation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(7):4504–4511. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13818
  51. Zhao BW, Fu J, Wang JH, et al. Quality of life in adult intermittent exotropia and the risk factors. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(3):442–447. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.03.18
  52. Hua L, Zhu H, Li R, et al. Development of a quality of life questionnaire for adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021;57(5):341–347. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200611-00392
  53. Hatt SR, Leske DA, Castañeda YS, et al. Understanding the Impact of Residual Amblyopia on Functional Vision and Eye-related Quality of Life Using the PedEyeQ. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;218:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.05.039
  54. Köksoy Vayısoğlu S, Öncü E, Dursun Ö, Dinç E. Investigation of Dry Eye Symptoms in Lecturers by Ocular Surface Disease Index. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019;49(3):142–148. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2018.67915
  55. Astakhov SY, Tkachenko NV. Trehalose efficacy in dry eye syndrome treatment after phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology journal. 2016;9(4):79–89. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV20164
  56. Kulikov AN, Churashov SV, Kamilova TA, Reituzov VA. Molecular genetic aspects of keratoconus pathogenesis. Ophthalmology journal. 2017;10(2):62–71. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV10262-71
  57. Bilalov EN, Yusupov AF, Nozimov AE, Oripov OI. Estimation of lacrimal dysfunction indices in patients with recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology journal 2020;13(1):11–16. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV19242
  58. Deswal J, Narang S, Gupta N, et al. To study the impact of diabetic retinopathy on quality of life in Indian diabetic patients. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(5):848–853. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1553_19
  59. Bian W, Wan J, Smith G, et al. Domains of health-related quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study in the Chinese cultural context. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4): e018756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018756
  60. Zhu W, Katinas EB, Solovyov MM, et al. Comparison of results and quality of life in patients with thyroid eye disease after different methods of orbital decompression. Ophthalmology journal. 2020;13(3):37–45. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV50821
  61. Al-Dairi W, Saeed AAA, Al OM. Sowayigh Impact of Quarantine During COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Life of Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis. Cureus. 2020;12(12): e12240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12240
  62. Azoulay-Sebban L, Zhao Z, Zenouda A, Lombardi M. Correlations Between Subjective Evaluation of Quality of Life, Visual Field Loss, and Performance in Simulated Activities of Daily Living in Glaucoma Patients. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(10):970–974. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001597
  63. Marino PF, Rossi M, Campagna G, et al. Effects of Citicoline, Homotaurine, and Vitamin E on Contrast Sensitivity and Visual-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Preliminary Study. Molecules. 2020;25(23):5614. doi: 10.3390/molecules25235614
  64. Zolotarev AV, Tselina MEH. Perspektivy klinikо-ehkonomicheskogo analiza v oftal’mologii. Russian medical journal. 2011;2(2):78–80. (In Russ.)
  65. Saakyan SV, Amiryan AG, Mironova IS. An analysis of long-term quality of life changes in uveal melanoma patients depending on age and treatment type. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2016;9(1):56–61. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2016-9-1-56-61
  66. Virgili G, Parravano M, Viola F, Varano M. Vision-related quality of life in patients treated for myopic choroidal neovascularization: A post hoc analysis of the OLIMPIC study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30(5):1069–1075. doi: 10.1177/1120672119853745
  67. Kazanova SY, Strakhov VV, Yartsev AV. Glaucoma treatment cost as seen by patients. Ophthalmology journal. 2013;6(4):15–20. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/OV2013415-20
  68. Bian W, Wan J, Tan M, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life in Chinese patients receiving treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a prospective longitudinal study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01561-3
  69. Şahl E, Share İdil ŞA. Comparison of Quality of Life Questionnaires in Patients with Low Vision. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021;51(2):83–88. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.99975
  70. Selivanova A, Fenwick E, Man R, et al. Outcomes After Comprehensive Vision Rehabilitation Using Vision-related Quality of Life Questionnaires: Impact of Vision Impairment and National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(2): 87–94. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001327
  71. Eguchi A, Hasegawa H, Kinouchi H, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11): e033940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033940
  72. Ovechkin IG, Malyshev AV, Karapetov GYu, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Different Assessment Methods of Life Quality in Patients with Vitreoretinal Pathology. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2016;13(4):265–272. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2016-4
  73. Xue WW, Zou HD. Rasch analysis of the Chinese Version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2019;55(8):582–588. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.08.007
  74. Şahlı E, Aysun Sİ. Comparison of quality of life questionnaires in patients with low vision. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021;51(2):83–88. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.99975

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2021 Ovechkin I.G., Kovrigina E.I., Konovalov M.E., Kumar V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies