Features of a well-timed macular hole closure related retinal regmatogenous detachment complicated by macular hole

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The literature review deals with the analysis of the timing and surgical techniques of macular hole closure in patients with retinal detachment complicated by macular hole. Modern concepts of treatment tactics for this disease, its efficacy are analyzed. Benefits and drawbacks of each of the discussed surgical treatment methods are specified.

About the authors

Rinat R. Fayzrakhmanov

N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center; Institute of Advanced Training of Doctors of the N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center

Email: rinatrf@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4341-3572
SPIN-code: 1620-0083

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Eye Diseases, Professor of the Department, Head of the Department of Eye Diseases

Russian Federation, Moscow; 65, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya st., Moscow, 105203

Mikhail M. Shishkin

N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center

Email: michail.shishkin@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5917-6153

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Eye Diseases, Chief Ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Evgenia A. Larina

N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center; Institute of Advanced Training of Doctors of the N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center

Email: alisme93@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5343-3350
SPIN-code: 8969-9526

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Ophthalmologist, Assistant of the Department of eye diseases

Russian Federation, Moscow; 65, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya st., Moscow, 105203

Olga L. Sekhina

Institute of Advanced Training of Doctors of the N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center

Author for correspondence.
Email: sekhina.ol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1499-1787
SPIN-code: 1618-3996

Postgraduate Student of the Department of eye diseases

Russian Federation, 65, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya st., Moscow, 105203

Elena E. Vaganova

Institute of Advanced Training of Doctors of the N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center

Email: vaganova.e.e@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2234-0914
SPIN-code: 5881-8822

Postgraduate Student of the Department of eye diseases

Russian Federation, 65, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya st., Moscow, 105203

References

  1. Obshcherossiiskaya obshchestvennaya organizatsiya “Assotsiatsiya vrachei-oftalmologov”. Federalnye klinicheskie rekomendatsii “Regmatogennaya otsloika setchatki”. 2017. 5 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, et al. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(6):678–684. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.157727
  3. Rumpf J, Gonin J. Inventor of the surgical treatment for retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 1976;21(3):276–284. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(76)90125-9
  4. Mitry D, Fleck BW, Wright AF, et al. Pathogenesis of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: predisposing anatomy and cell biology. Retina. 2010;30(10):1561–1572. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181f669e6
  5. Lyskin PV. Patogeneticheskie razlichiya regmatogennykh otsloek setchatki. Sovremennye tekhnologii lecheniya vitreoretinal’noi patologii. Proceeding of the Science and Practice conferences. Moscow. 2008. P. 110–112. (In Russ.)
  6. Zakharov VD, Airapetova LEh. Vremennaya tamponada silikonom makulyarnykh razryvov setchatki. Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery. 2000;(2):49–53. (In Russ.)
  7. Gordon R, Chatfield RK. Pits in the optic disc associated with macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(4):468–472. doi: 10.1136/bjo.53.7.481
  8. Kang JH, Park KA, Shin WJ, Kang SW. Macular hole as a risk factor of choroidal detachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2008;22(2):100–103. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2008.22.2.100
  9. Tereshchenko AV, Belyi YuA, Shkvorchenko DO, Solovyov DK. Tekhnika formirovaniya fragmentov vnutrennei pogranichnoi membrany dlya zakrytiya makulyarnogo otverstiya pri otsloike setchatki, oslozhnennoi makulyarnym razryvom. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015;(1):126–128. (In Russ.)
  10. Makkaeva SM. Opyt lecheniya otsloiki setchatki pri pomoshchi tamponady PFOS i lazerkoagulyatsii zony razryva. Aktual’nye voprosy oftal’mologii. 2000;(1):233–235. (In Russ.)
  11. Chaker N, Mghaieth F. Post-traumatic retinal detachment with posterior giant retinal tear. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014;37(3):268. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2013.05.020
  12. Okamoto F, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Vision-related quality of life and visual function after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(1):85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.02.011
  13. Ganekal S, Nagarajappa A. Strabismus following scleral buckling surgery. Strabismus. 2016;24(1):16–20. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2015.1130066
  14. Siwiec-Prościńska J, Gotz-Wieckowska A, Rakowicz P, et al. The disturbances of the eye position and motility in patients after scleral buckling surgery due to retinal detachment. Klin Oczna. 2011;113 (4–6):141–145.
  15. Antelava DN, Pivovarov NN, Safoyan AA. Pervichnaya otsloika setchatki. Tbilisi: Sabchota Sakartvelo, 1986. 160 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Park SW, Kwon HJ, Byon IS, et al. Impact of age on scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2017;31(4):328–335. DOI: 10.3341 /kjo.2016.0024
  17. Kozina EV, Kazanskaya TS, Gololobov VT. Functional outcomes of operated retinal detachment. Pacific Medical Journal. 2018;(2):26–33. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2018.2.26-33
  18. Evseev IS. Otsenka funktsional’nykh rezul’tatov khirurgicheskogo lecheniya regmatogennykh otsloek setchatki s razlichnym srokom vozniknoveniya. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences. 2012;2(2):114. (In Russ.)
  19. Ross WH. Visual recovery after macula-off retinal detachment. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(4):440–446. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700192
  20. Liu F, Meyer CH, Mennel S, et al. Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica. 2006;220(3):174–180. doi: 10.1159/000091761
  21. Hassan TS, Sarrafizadeh R, Ruby AJ, et al. The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(1):146–152. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00886-7
  22. Bonnet M, Semiglia R. Spontaneous curse of retinal detachment with macular hole in patients with severe myopia. J Fr Ophthalmol. 1991;14:618.
  23. Min WK. Spontaneous reattachment of retinal detachment with macular hole in nonmyopic patients. Korean J Ophthalmol. 1995;9(1):66–68. doi: 10.3341/kjo.1995.9.1.66
  24. Haut J, Faure JF, Larricart P, et al. Treatment by internal tamponade of retinal detachment with a macular hole. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1987;10(11):707–715.
  25. Wolfensberger TJ, Gonvers M. Long-term follow-up of retinal detachment due to macular hole in myopic eyes treated by temporary silicone oil tamponade and laser photocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(9):1786–1791. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90344-5
  26. Wolfensberger TJ, Gonvers M. Surgical treatment of retinal detachment owing to macular hole. Semin Ophthalmol. 2000;15(2): 122–127. doi: 10.3109/08820530009040003
  27. Kono T, Takesue Y, Shiga S. Scleral resection technique combined with vitrectomy for a macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes. Ophthalmologica. 2006;220(3):159–163. doi: 10.1159/000091758
  28. Fujikawa M, Kawamura H, Kakinoki M, et al. Scleral imbrication combined with vitrectomy and gas tamponade for refractory macular hole retinal detachment associated with high myopia. Retina. 2014;34(12):2451–2457. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000246
  29. Mitra A, Sen A, Bhushan B. Re: Scleral imbrication combined with vitrectomy and gas tamponade for refractory macular hole retinal detachment associated with high myopia. Retina. 2015;35(7):34–35. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000637
  30. Baiborodov YaV. Anatomicheskie i funktsional’nye rezultaty primeneniya razlichnykh variantov tekhniki khirurgicheskogo zakrytiya makulyarnykh razryvov. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015;5(1):22–24. (In Russ.)
  31. Konovalov ME, Kozhukhov AA, Zenina ML, et al. Metod povtornogo zakrytiya nezakryvshikhsya makulyarnykh razryvov. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2016;(1):115. (In Russ.)
  32. Burmeister SL, Hartwig D, Limb GA, et al. Effect of various platelet preparations on retinal Müller cells. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(10):4881–4886. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3057
  33. Orellana J, Lieberman RM. Stage III macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77(9):555–558. DOI: 10.1136 /bjo.77.9.555
  34. Vodovozov AM. Otsloika setchatki, makulyarnoe otverstie, proliferativnaya vitreoretinopatiya kak oslozhneniya involyutsionnogo vitreoretinalnogo sindroma. Volgograd: Komitet po pechati i informatsii, 1998. 104 p. (In Russ.)
  35. Toropygin SG, Nazarova SV, Dawarah H, Maslov AN. Prognostic factors of functional results of surgery for idiopathic (primary) epimacular membranes: the duration of epimacular proliferation. Part 1. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(2):99–104. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-2-99-104
  36. Yamashita T, Sakamoto T, Terasaki H, et al; Writing committee of Japan-Clinical Retina Research Team. Best surgical technique and outcomes for large macular holes: retrospective multicentre study in Japan. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(8):904–910. doi: 10.1111/aos.13795
  37. Oh H. Idiopathic macular hole. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54: 150–158. doi: 10.1159/000360461
  38. Garweg JG, Bergstein D, Windisch B, et al. Recovery of visual field and acuity after removal of epiretinal and inner limiting membranes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;2(92):220–224. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.131862
  39. Sheng Y, Sun W, Shen Y. Delayed closure of macular hole secondary to Terson syndrome after vitrectomy: A case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(31):16577. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016577
  40. Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, et al. The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2611–2619. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.042
  41. Zhang P, Shang Q, Ma J, et al. Correlation between postoperative area of high autofluorescence in macula and visual acuity after macular hole closure. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017;27(6):781–785. DOI: 10.5301/ ejo.5000953
  42. Casini G, Mura M, Figus M, et al. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular holesurgery without extra manipulation of the flap. Retina. 2017;37(11):2138–2144. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001470
  43. Fayzrakhmanov RR. Anti-VEGF therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: from randomized trials to routine clinical practice. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2019;12(2):97–105. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2019-12-2-97-105
  44. Pavlovskii OA. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie makulyarnykh razryvov s sokhraneniem vnutrennei pogranichnoi membrany [dissertation]. Moscow, 2020. 143 p. (In Russ.)
  45. De Novelli FJ, Goldbaum M, Monteiro MLR, et al. Recurrence rate and need for reoperation after surgery with or without internal limiting membrane removal for the treatment of the epiretinal membrane. Int J Retin Vitr. 2017;3:48. doi: 10.1186/40942-017-0101-z
  46. Clark A, Balducci N, Pichi F, et al. Swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina. 2012;32(8):1608–1613. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182437e86
  47. Spaide RF. “Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance” after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina. 2012;32(9):1719–1726. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182671191
  48. Steven P, Laqua H, Wong D, Hoerauf H. Secondary paracentral retinal holes following internal limiting membrane removal. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:293–295. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.078188
  49. Ito Y, Terasaki H, Takahashi A, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(8):1415–1420. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.023
  50. Suda K, Hangai M, Yoshimura N. Axial length and outcomes of macular hole surgery assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(1):118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.07.007
  51. Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, et al. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86: 390–393. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.4.390
  52. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(10):2018–2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.011
  53. Fayzrakhmanov RR, Shishkin MM, Pavlovskii OA, Larina EA. Operativnoe lechenie makulyarnogo razryva. Ufa: Bashkirskaya ehntsiklopediya, 2020. 144 p. (In Russ.)
  54. Belyi IA, Tereshchenko AV, Shkvorchenko DO, et al. A new technique of inverted internal limiting membrane flap formation in a surgical treatment for large idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2015;12(4):27-33. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2015-4-27-33
  55. Patent RU2617528C1. Byul. № 12. Kazaikin VN, Novoselova TN. Sposob khirurgicheskogo lecheniya bol’shikh idiopaticheskikh makulyarnykh razryvov s ispolzovaniem tekhniki «perevernutogo loskuta vnutrennei pogranichnoi membrany. (In Russ.)
  56. Yamashiro K, Kinoshita-Nakano E, Ota T, et al. Floating flap of internal limiting membrane in myopic macular hole surgery. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(4):693–698. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3936-655
  57. Kontos A, Tee J, Stuart A, et al. Duration of intraocular gases following vitreoretinal surgery. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(2):231–236. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3438-3
  58. Nikolaenko EN, Sosnovskii SV, Kulikov AN, Gribanov NA. Vliyanie vitrehktomii na ugnetenie ehlektrogeneza setchatki v posleoperatsionnom periode pri khirurgicheskom lechenii makulyarnogo razryva. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2016;(4):156–161. (In Russ.)
  59. Imai H, Ohta K. Microperimetric determination of retinal sensitivity in areas of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer following internal limiting membrane peeling. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(5):435–440. doi: 10.1007/s10384-010-0839-4
  60. Tsuchiya S, Higashide T, Sugiyama K. Visual field changes after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for epiretinal membrane or macular hole in glaucomatous eyes. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):0177526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177526
  61. Baba T, Yamamoto S, Kimoto R, et al. Reduction of thickness of ganglion cell complex after internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(9):1173–1180. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.170
  62. Kelly NE, Wendel RT, Kase S, et al. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(5):654–659. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031
  63. Ye T, Yu J-G, Liao L, et al. Macular hole surgery recovery with and without face-down posturing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19:265. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1272-1
  64. Ortisi E, Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V. Surgical management of retinal detachment because of macular hole in highly myopic eyes. Retina. 2012;32(9):1704–1718 doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31826b671c
  65. Meng L, Wei W, Li Y, et al. Treatment of retinal detachment secondary to macular hole in highly myopic eyes: pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peel and silicone oil tamponade. Retina. 2014;34(3):470–476. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31829d004b
  66. Takashi H, Inoue M, Koto T, et al. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for theatment of macular hole retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes. Retina. 2018;38(12):2317–2326. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001898
  67. Gu X, Hu Z, Qian H, et al. Perfluorocarbon liquid — Assisted inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane peeling for highly myopic macular hole retinal detachment. Retina. 2021;41(2):317–323. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002853
  68. Kaluzny JJ, Zabel P, Kaluzna M, et al. Macular sensitivity in the area of internal limiting membrane pilling in eyes after pars plana vitrectomy with the temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for a full-thickness myopic macular hole. Retina. 2021;41(8):1627–1634. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003096
  69. Liu X, Huang J, Zhou R, et al. Comparison of internal limiting membrane pilling with the inverted internal internal limiting membrane flap technique for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment coexisting with macular hole. Retina. 2022;42(4):697–703. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003370
  70. Lyu J, Xia F, Zhao P. Intraoperative perfluorocarbon liquid tamponade technique for treatment of extensive retinal detachment secondary to a myopic macular hole. Retina. 2022. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003429
  71. Deobhakta A, Rosen R. Retinal tamponades: current uses and future technologies. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2020;8(3):144–151. doi: 10.1007/s40135-020-00247-9
  72. Brockmann T, Steger C, Weger M, et al. Risk assessment of idiopathic macular holes undergoing vitrectomy with dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina. 2013;33(6):1132–1136. doi: 10.1097/iae.0b013e31827c5384
  73. Essex RW, Kingston ZS, Moreno-Betancur M, et al. The effect of postoperative face-down positioning and of long- versus short-acting gas in macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5): 1129–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.039
  74. Thompson JT, Sjaarda RN, Lansing MB. The results of vitreous surgery for chronic macular holes. Retina. 1997;17(6):493–501. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199711000-00002
  75. Benzerroug M, Genevois O, Siahmed K, et al. Results of surgery on macular holes that develop after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(2):217–219. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.122796
  76. Wu Y, Zhu W, Xu D, et al. Indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(11): e48405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048405.e48405
  77. Azuma K, Noda Y, Hirasawa K, Ueta T. Brilliant blue G-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole. Retina. 2016;36(5):851–858. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000000968
  78. Yamauchi Y, Nakamura H, Hayakawa K, Sawaguchi S. Persistence of triamcinolone acetonide following macular hole surgery. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2006;84(5):711–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00702.x
  79. Koto T, Inoue M, Shinoda K, et al. Residual crystals of triamcinolone acetonide in macular hole may prevent complete closure. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2007;85(8):913–914. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00965.x
  80. Sen AC, Kohli GM, Mitra A, Talwar D. Successful management of persistent macular hole after macular hole surgery with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: A case report. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(6):1193–1196. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1511_19
  81. Medina CA, Ortiz AG, Relhan N, et al. Macular hole after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2017;37(6):1065–1072. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001351
  82. Okonkwo ON, Akanbi T, Agweye CT. Secondary Macular Holes Post Pars Plana. Vitrectomy Int Med Case Rep J. 2022;15(5):141–155. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S357655

Copyright (c) 2023 ECO-vector LLC


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies