Outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in pediatric glaucoma

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many types of pediatric glaucoma, there is no clear algorithm for surgical management. In these situations, the procedure of choice can be the implantation of various types of drainage devices.

AIM: To evaluate the outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation in refractory pediatric glaucoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment results of 52 children (67 eyes) aged 1 month – 17 years (6.6 ± 0.6 years) with unsuccessfully operated primary congenital glaucoma, with glaucoma associated with congenital anomalies of the eyeball, with secondary glaucoma were analyzed. The surgery was considered to be effective when stable intraocular pressure (IOP) was achieved, there were no complications, and no need for repeated interventions.

RESULTS: The effect of surgery was maintained for 6 months in 97% of patients, but after 1, 2 and 3 years it decreased to 91.8%, 82%, and 73.9%, respectively, and to 42.8% after 7 years. Postoperative complications included filtering bleb encapsulation (25.3%), iris retraction to the tube with pupil dislocation (4.5%); ciliochoroidal detachment (4.5%); cataract (3.0%), conjunctival erosion with tube eruption (4.5%), endophthalmitis (1.5%), retinal detachment (6.0%), tube retraction (1.5%), hyphema (3.0%). The risk factors for an unfavorable outcome of the procedure were: an increase in the anteroposterior axis of the eyeball length by 20% or more compared to the age norm, IOP at the time of the surgery higher than 32 mm Hg, as well as previous antiglaucoma filtering procedures.

CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of the drainage device Ahmed Glaucoma Valve is indicated for refractory pediatric glaucoma in case of ineffectiveness of previous surgeries. However, it is necessary to take into account the decrease in the effectiveness of the device over time, which, combined with the possibility of complications, requires long-term follow-up of patients.

About the authors

Natalia N. Sadovnikova

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: natasha.sadov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8217-4594

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Ophthalmology

Russian Federation, 2, Litovsckaya st., Saint Petersburg, 194100

Vladimir V. Brzheskiy

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: vvbrzh@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7361-0270

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Ophthalmology

Russian Federation, 2, Litovsckaya st., Saint Petersburg, 194100

Natalia V. Prisich

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: prisichnv@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7749-7850

Ophthalmologist

Russian Federation, 2, Litovsckaya st., Saint Petersburg, 194100

Marina A. Zertsalova

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: mazercalova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4559-0051

Assistant of Department of Ophthalmology

Russian Federation, 2, Litovsckaya st., Saint Petersburg, 194100

Andrei Yu. Baranov

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: homeandrey@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6024-4635

Assistant of Department of Ophthalmology

Russian Federation, 2, Litovsckaya st., Saint Petersburg, 194100

References

  1. Katargina LA, Mazanova EV, Tarasenkov AO, et al. The federal clinical guidelines on “Diagnostics, medicamentous and surgical treatment of the children presenting with congenital glaucoma”. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology. 2016;11(1):33–50. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/1993-1859-2016-11-1-33-51
  2. Gutiérrez-Díaz E, Mencía-Gutiérrez E, Tejada-Palacios P. The role of glaucoma drainage devices in paediatric glaucoma. Eur Opht. 2012;6(4):208–213. doi: 10.17925/eor.2012.06.04.208
  3. Mofti A, Alharbi A, Alsuhaibani M, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Ahmed glaucoma valve surgery in childhood glaucoma. Journal of AAPOS. 2020;24(6):346.e1–346.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.014
  4. Morad Y, Donaldson CE, Kim YuM, et al. The Ahmed drainage implant in the treatment of pediatric glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(6):821–829. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02274-2
  5. Sadovnikova NN, Zertsalova MA. Vrozhdennaya glaukoma. Brzheskii VV, Ivanov DO, editors. Neonatal’naya oftal’mologiya. Moscow: GEHOTAR-Media, 2021. (In Russ.)
  6. Zertsalova MA, Brjeskiy VV, Diskalenko OV, Gaidar MV. The features development and clinical course of primary congenital glaucoma in infants. Pediatrician. 2013;4(2):18–23. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/PED4218-23
  7. Molteno AC, Ancer E, Biljon GV. Children with advanced glaucoma treated by draining implants. S Afr J Ophthalmol. 1973;1:55–61.
  8. Molotkova IA, Belyy YuA, Evsigneeva EM. Drainage surgery of glaucoma in children. Vestnik Orenburg State University. 2012;(12):133–135. (In Russ.)
  9. Rascheskov AYu, Loskoutov IA. Modern technologies of refractory glaucoma treatment. Review. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2012;9(1):4–9. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2012-1-54-62
  10. Sadovnikova NN, Prisich NV, Brzheskiy VV, et al. Glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric glaucoma. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2019;(3):170–174. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2019-3-170-174
  11. Albis-Donado O, Gil-Carrasco F, Romero-Quijada R, Thomas R. Evaluation of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation through a needle-generated scleral tunnel in Mexican children with glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;8:365–373. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.67039
  12. Chen A, Yu F, Law SK, et al. Valved glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric glaucoma. Retrospective long-term outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(9):1030–1035. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1856
  13. Al-Mobarak F, Khan AO. Complications and 2-year valve survival following Ahmed valve implantation during the first 2 years of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:795–798. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.150037
  14. Ou Y, Yu F, Law SK, et al. Outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in children with primary congenital glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(11):1436–1441. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.267
  15. Eksioglu U, Yakin M, Sungur G, et al. Short- to long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve in the management of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with pediatric uveitis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52(3):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.015
  16. Pakravan M, Esfandiari H, Yazdani S, et al. Clinical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in pediatric glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;1(29):44–51. doi: 10.1177/1120672118761332
  17. Yang HK, Park KH. Clinical outcomes after Ahmed valve implantation in refractory paediatric glaucoma. Eye. 2009;23: 1427–1435
  18. Balekudaru S, Vadalkar J, George R, Vijaya L. The use of Ahmed glaucoma valve in the management of pediatric glaucoma. J AAPOS. 2014;18(4):351–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.03.013
  19. Autrata R, Helmanova I, Oslejskova H, et al. Glaucoma drainage implants in the treatment of refractory glaucoma in pediatric patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(6):928–937. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700610
  20. Chen A, Yu F, Giaconi JA. et al. Valved glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric glaucoma: retrospective longterm outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(9)1030–1035. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1856
  21. Spiess K, Calvo JP. Outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve in paediatric glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery in persistent foetal vasculature. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(3):1070–1078. doi: 10.1177/1120672120919066

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The eye of a newborn child with glaucoma due to congenital aniridia

Download (78KB)
3. Fig. 2. The eye of a 16-year-old child with aniridic syndrome

Download (96KB)
4. Fig. 3. The eye of a 14-year-old child with aniridic syndrome, pseudophakia with an implanted valve

Download (83KB)
5. Fig. 4. Dynamics of the hypotensive effect of Ahmed valve implantation during the follow-up period

Download (127KB)
6. Fig. 5. Bleb encapsulation

Download (229KB)
7. Fig. 6. Retraction of the iris to the tube (shown by the arrow)

Download (127KB)
8. Fig. 7. Tube retraction

Download (175KB)
9. Fig. 8. Echogram of a patient with postoperative total ciliochoroidal detachment

Download (87KB)
10. Fig. 9. The eye of a 5-year-old patient with endophthalmitis due to tube erosion 3 months after implantation of the Ahmed valve

Download (105KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Sadovnikova N.N., Brzheskiy V.V., Prisich N.V., Zertsalova M.A., Baranov A.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies