Email this article Home birth as a way of protection by woman itself and of her child
- Authors: Brekhman G.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Interdisciplinary Clinical Center of Haifa University
- Issue: Vol 61, No 5 (2012)
- Pages: 115-121
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/jowd/article/view/1316
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD615115-121
- ID: 1316
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The growing obstetrical aggression as aspiration of the doctors actively to operate by labor in a combination with formal attitudes between the woman and accompanying man in labor have given a pulse to occurrence and increase in the world of alternative movement for home birth. From a position of perinatal psychology it could be considered as a display of a woman self-defence and her protection of the unborn child. The author discusses the significance of the mental factor in labor, and also in a choice of a place of delivery. He comes to the conclusion about an opportunity of parallel functioning of two forms of support of the women in labor: in maternity branch of hospital and home under condition of the legislatively authorized Rules about their interaction
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Grigori Iosifovich Brekhman
Interdisciplinary Clinical Center of Haifa University
Email: grigorib@013.net
Doctor of Science, Scientific Consultant, Professor
References
- Брехман Г. И. Существует ли природная противоболевая система защиты женщины и ребенка в родах? // Жiночий лiкар. — 2011. — № 4(36). — С. 19–23.
- Брехман Г. И. Шейка матки: преобразования в связи с родовым процессом // Жiночий лiкар. — 2010. — № 6. — С. 77– 83.
- Домашние роды в России / Хасанов А. А. [и др.] // Актуальные вопросы акушерства и гинекологии. Т. 1, вып. 1. — Казань, 1992.
- Пахнер Ф. За жизнь матерей. Трагедия жизни И. Ф. Земмельвейса: пер. с чешск. — М., 1963. — 223 с.
- Позиция пятого цвета у беременных женщин / Брехман Г. И. [и др.] // Журнал практического психолога. — 2003. — № 4–5. — С. 250–260.
- Радзинский В. Е. Акушерская агрессия. — М.:Status Praesens, 2011. — 210 с.
- Campbell R., MacFarlane A. Place of delivery: a review // Br. J. Obstet Gynaecol. — 1986. — Vol. 93, N 7. — P. 675–683.
- Eskes T. K. Home deliveries in the Netherlands — perinatal mortality and morbidity // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. — 1992. — Vol. 38, N 3. — P. 161–169.
- Midwifery Today. Com., E-news, V. 1, Issue 29: Homebirth. July 16, 1999. URL: www.midwifery.ru/st/home_birth.htm. (дата обращения 05.09.2012).
- Goer H. Obstetric myths versus research realities, a guide to the medical literature. — N. Y.: Bergin & Garvey, 1995.
- Kitzinger Sh. Birth Your Way. Dorling Kindersley. — N. Y., 2002. — 208 p.
- Korte D., Scaer R. A Good Birth, a Safe Birth. — London: Harvard Common Press, 1999.
- May Gaskin Ina. Spiritual Midwifery. — N. Y.:Book Publishin Co, 1975. — 480 p.
- Outcomes for births booked under an independent midwife and births in NHS maternity units: matched comparison study / Symon A. [ et al.] // BMJ. — 2009. — Vol. 338. — P. b 2060.
- Tew M. Place of birth and perinatal mortality // J. R. coll. Gen. Pract. — 1985. — Vol. 35 (277). — P. 390–394.
Supplementary files
