Email this article 
Post a Comment Comparison of strategies for myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary heart disease and multivessel coronary artery disease
- Authors: Bocharov A.V.1, Popov L.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Korolev E.I. Kostroma regional clinical hospital
- N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center
- Issue: Vol 10, No 4 (2019)
- Pages: 30-35
- Section: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/clinpractice/article/view/12631
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract12631
- ID: 12631
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Justification. To this day, the problem of choosing the method of complete revascularization in the category of patients with acute coronary syndrome without the ST segment elevation and multi-vascular lesions of the coronary bed does not lose its relevance. The goal of this study was to compare the results of surgical manipulations in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using 3rd-generation drug-coated stents and coronary artery bypass grafting, according to the two-year follow-up data.
Methods. The results of surgical and endovascular revascularization strategies were compared in 140 patients with ischemic heart disease and multivessel coronary disease after previously successfully performed stenting of a clinically dependent artery using 3rd-generation drug-coated stents for acute coronary syndrome without the ST segment elevation based on the results of a two-year follow-up.
Results. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical, demographic and operational characteristics between the groups, except for the number of smoking patients, wich was significantly higher in the PCI group. In the PCI group, there was a statistically significant difference in the frequency of repeated revascularizations and the combined MACCE point.
Discussion. The obtained results showed the advantage of CABG in a group of patients with previously successfully performed PCI of the clinically dependent artery for non -STEMI and multi-vascular lesions.
Conclusion. In patients with coronary artery disease and multivascular lesions of the coronary bed, who had successfully underwent stenting of the clinical-dependent artery using stents of the 3rd generation with drug coating for acute coronary syndrome without the ST segment elevation, and intermediate severity of lesions on the SYNTAX scale when performing full functional revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting or stenting, there are no differences in the indicators of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, acute cerebrovascular disease, frequency of return of the clinic angina pectoris, with the exception of the frequency of repeated revascularization and composite MACCE points, which was statistically significantly higher in the group of stenting.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Aleksandr V. Bocharov
Korolev E.I. Kostroma regional clinical hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: bocharovav@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6027-2898
SPIN-code: 6073-1445
ResearcherId: C-6324-2019
Cand. Med. Sc., Chief of Department, Endovascular Surgeon
Russian Federation, 156013, Kostroma, pr. Mira, 114Leonid V. Popov
N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center
Email: popovcardio@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0530-3268
Professor, head of the Department of cardiac surgery
Russian Federation, 105203, Moscow, Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya str., 70References
- Чазова И.Е., Ощепкова Е.В. Борьба с сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями: проблемы и пути их решения на современном этапе // Вестник Росздравнадзора. — 2015. — №5. — С. 7–10. [Chazova IE, Oschepkova EV. The fight against cardiovascular diseases: problems and solutions at the present stage. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora. 2015;(5):7–10. (In Russ).]
- Бокерия Л.А., Алекян Б.Г. Рентгенэндоваскулярная диагностика и лечение заболеваний сердца и сосудов в Российской Федерации. — М.: НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН, 2011. [Bockeria LA, Alekyan BG. Rentgen·endovaskulyarnaya diagnostika i lecheniye zabolevaniy serdtsa i sosudov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Moscow: Nauchnyy tsentr serdechno-sosudistoy khirurgii imeni A.N. Bakuleva Rossiyskoy Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk; 2011. (In Russ).]
- Fukui T, Tabata M, Tobaru T, et al. Early and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with left main disease: single-center results of multidisciplinary decision making. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(5):301–307. doi: 10.1007/s11748-013-0357-7.
- Ганюков В.И. Доказательная база приоритетной роли первичного чрескожного коронарного вмешательства в реваскуляризации больных с инфарктом миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST // Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. — 2013. — №1. — С. 24–34. [Ganyukov VI. Evidence base for priority role of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in revascularization of stemi patients. Complex Issue of Cardiovascular Disease. 2013;(1):24–34. (In Russ).] doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2013-1-24-34.
- Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267–315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320.
- Curtis JP, Schreiner G, Wang Y, et al. All-cause readmission and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(10):903–907. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.076.
- Meadows ES, Bae JP, Zagar A, et al. Rehospitalization following percutaneous coronary intervention for commercially insured patients with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:342. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-342.
- Ranasinghe I, Alprandi-Costa B, Chow V, et al. Risk stratification in the setting of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes 1999–2007. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(5):617–624. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.005.
- Ганюков В.И., Тарасов Р.С., Кочергин Н.А., Барбараш О.Л. Чрескожное коронарное вмешательство при остром коронарном синдроме без подъема сегмента ST // Эндоваскулярная хирургия. — 2016. — Т.3. — №1. — С. 5–19. [Ganjukov VI, Tarasov RS, Kochergin NA, Barbarash OL. Percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. Endovascular surgery. 2016;3(1):5–19. (In Russ).]
- Ben-Gal Y, Moses JW, Mehran R, et al. Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(10):1059–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.017.
- Palmerini T, Genereux P, Caixeta A, et al. Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(24):2389–2397. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.032.
Supplementary files
