Acute paraproctitis, Fournier's phlegmon: a clinical case. Radical treatment with the plasty of the wound of the perineum and scrotum

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: The article presents the stages and results of treating a patient with a life-threatening condition caused by acute paraproctitis complicated by necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum and scrotum (Fournier's gangrene). The patient underwent a radical surgical treatment with the removal of the affected tissues, and, in the delayed period, a plastic surgery of the perineum and scrotum with a pedicled flap. Clinical case description: Patient Sh., 62 years old, was hospitalized at the Federal Research and Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia on an emergency basis with the following diagnosis: acute horseshoe-shaped posterior paraproctitis; non-clostridial phlegmon of the perineum and scrotum; sepsis. The patient was operated on urgently: a total necrectomy was performed with a wide excision of the affected tissues, excision of the anterior fistula, and a leak along the left inguinal cord into the abdominal cavity was identified and drained. The patient's condition in a few hours after the operation was characterized by pronounced positive dynamics, the effects of intoxication were stopped. 7 hours after the operation, the patient was transferred from the ICU to the department of coloproctology. A repeated surgical treatment with the revision of wounds was not required. 16 weeks after the first operation, a planned operation was performed with an excision of the fistula of the rectum and plasty of the perineum and scrotum with a rotary flap. The wounds healed by first intention. The patient recovered with all the pelvic functions completely restored. Conclusion: This clinical example can be used as a guide for the step-by-step treatment in this category of patients.

About the authors

Denis L. Davidovich

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: denisdavidovich@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2406-037X

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, 28, Orekhovy blvd, Moscow, 115682

Alexander Ya. Solomka

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: Dr.solomkaa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9515-6371
Russian Federation, 28, Orekhovy blvd, Moscow, 115682

Andrey K. Burovskiy

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: Drun-bur@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4225-8635
Russian Federation, 28, Orekhovy blvd, Moscow, 115682

German S. Tomashevskiy

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: german.tomash@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1108-0443
Russian Federation, 28, Orekhovy blvd, Moscow, 115682

Dmitry V. Razbirin

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Medical Assistance and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Author for correspondence.
Email: razbirin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2644-6153
Russian Federation, 28, Orekhovy blvd, Moscow, 115682

References

  1. Прохоров А.В. Гангрена Фурнье: современные подходы к лечению (обзор литературы) // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2016. № 2. С. 106–177. [Prokhorov AV. Fournier’s gangrene: modern approaches to treatment (literature review). Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2016;(2): 106–177. (In Russ).]
  2. Mallikarjuna MN, Vijayakumar A, Patil VS, Shivswamy BS. Fournier’s gangrene: current practices. ISRN Surgery. 2012; 2012:942437. doi: 10.5402/2012/942437
  3. Новошинов Г.В., Шереметьева А.А., Старченкова Л.П. Гангрена Фурнье у ребенка 1 месяца // Детская хирургия. 2016. Т. 20, № 1. С. 51–52. [Novoshinov GV, Sheremetyeva AA, Starchenkova LP. Fournier’s gangrene in a 1 month old baby. Pediatric Surgery. 2016;20(1):51–52. (In Russ).] doi: 10.18821/1560-9510-2016-20-1-51-52
  4. Привольнев В.В., Плешков В.Г., Козлов Р.С., и др. Диагностика и лечение некротических инфекций кожи и мягких тканей на примере гангрены Фурнье // Амбулаторная хирургия. 2015. № 3-4. С. 50–57. [Privolnev VV, Pleshkov VG, Kozlov RS, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of necrotic infections of the skin and soft tissues on the example of Fournier’s gangrene. Ambulatory Surgery. 2015;(3-4):50–57. (In Russ).]
  5. Черепанин А.И., Светлов К.В., Чернов А.Ф., Бармин Е.В. Другой взгляд на «болезнь Фурнье в практике хирурга» // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2009. № 10. С. 47–50. [Cherepanin AI, Svetlov KV, Chernov AF, Barmin EV. Another look at «Fournier’s disease in the practice of a surgeon». Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2009;(10):47–50. (In Russ).]
  6. Егоркин М.А. Современные подходы к лечению острого анаэробного парапроктита // Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2011. Т. 21, № 3. С. 74–79. [Egorkin MA. Modern approaches to the treatment of acute anaerobic paraproctitis. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2011;(3):74–79. (In Russ).]
  7. Алиев С.А., Алиев Е.С, Зейналов В.М. Болезнь Фурнье в свете современных представлений // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2014. № 4. С. 34–39. [Aliev SA, Aliev ES, Zeynalov VM. Fournier’s disease in the light of modern concepts. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2014;(4):34–39. (In Russ).]
  8. Ягудаев Д.М., Дербенев В.А., Айвазян Д.Р., Соколов Д.А. Современный взгляд на лечение гнойных ран мошонки (обзор литературы) // Лазерная медицина. 2015. Т. 19, № 2. С. 57–65. [Yagudaev DM, Derbenev VA, Aivazyan DR, Sokolov DA. A modern view on the treatment of purulent wounds of the scrotum (literature review). Laser Medicine. 2015;19(2): 57–65. (In Russ).]
  9. Korkut M, Içöz G, Dayangaç M, et al. Outcome analysis in patients with Fournier’s gangrene: report of 45 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(5):649–652. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6626-x
  10. Unalp HR, Kamer E, Derici H, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: evaluation of 68 patients and analysis of prognostic variables. J Postgrad Med. 2008;54(2):102–105. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.40775
  11. Akcan A, Sözüer E, Akyildiz H, et al. Necessity of preventive colostomy for Fournier’s gangrene of the anorectal region. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009;15(4):342–346.
  12. Estrada O, Martinez I, Del Bas M, et al. Rectal diversion without colostomy in Fournier’s gangrene. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13(2):157–159. doi: 10.1007/s10151-009-0474-6
  13. Erol B, Tuncel A, Hanci V, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: overview of prognostic factors and definition of new prognostic parameter. Urology. 2010;75(5):1193–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.090
  14. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2015 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):147–159. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu296
  15. Yanar H, Taviloglu K, Ertekin C, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: risk factors and strategies for management. World J Surg. 2006;30(9):1750–1754. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0777-3
  16. Norton KS, Johnson LW, Perry T, et al. Management of Fournier’s gangrene: an eleven year retrospective analysis of early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Am Surg. 2002; 68(8):709–713.
  17. Pol AG, Groeneveld AE, de Jong IJ, Mensink HJ. Fournier’s gangrene. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999;143(44):2177–2181. (In Dutch).
  18. Huang CS. Fournier’s gangrene. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(12): 1158. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1609306
  19. Korhonen K. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in acute necrotizing infections with a special reference to the effects on tissue gas tensions. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 2000;(214):7–36.
  20. Sroczyński M, Sebastian M, Rudnicki J, et al. A complex approach to the treatment of Fournier’s gangrene. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013;22(1):131–135.
  21. Chernyadyev SA, Ufimtseva MA, Vishnevskaya IF, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: literature review and clinical cases. Urol Int. 2018;101(1):91–97. doi: 10.1159/000490108
  22. Hagedorn JC, Wessells H. A contemporary update on Fournier’s gangrene. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(4):205–214. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.243
  23. Gadler T, Huey S, Hunt K. Recognizing Fournier’s gangrene in the emergency department. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2019;41(1): 33–38. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000221
  24. El-Qushayri AE, Khalaf KM, Dahy A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene mortality: a 17-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;92:218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.12.030
  25. Wongwaisayawan S, Krishna S, Haroon M, et al. Fournier gangrene: pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(11): 3838–3848. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02549-9
  26. Singh A, Ahmed K, Aydin A, et al. Fournier’s gangrene. A clinical review. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88(3):157–164. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2016.3.157

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Patient Sh., 62 years old, diagnosis of acute horseshoe-shaped posterior paraproctitis, non-clostridial phlegmon of the perineum and scrotum, sepsis (Fournier's phlegmon): local status at the time of admission.

Download (1MB)
3. Fig. 2. The same patient. Type of surgical wound after necrectomy and drainage.

Download (1MB)
4. Fig. 3. The same patient. The condition before and 3 months after necrectomy: а — local status before surgery; б — the result of plastic surgery of the perineum and scrotum with a movable skin flap on the leg of the thigh skin.

Download (1MB)
5. Fig. 4. The same patient. The result of plastic surgery.

Download (1MB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Davidovich D.L., Solomka A.Y., Burovskiy A.K., Tomashevskiy G.S., Razbirin D.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies