Ischemic stroke in combat conditions. Vasculocerebral injury

Abstract

During armed conflicts, the incidence of ischemic stroke among military personnel increases substantially compared with peacetime. In addition to the elevated risk of combat-related injuries, military service members are exposed to intense physical and emotional stress and extreme environmental factors, which contribute to the toll of both common (atherosclerotic arterial changes, diabetes mellitus, obesity, cardiovascular diseases) and specific risk factors more typical of young adults (cardiac sources of embolism, non-inflammatory and inflammatory arteriopathies, coagulation disorders), as well as generate additional stroke risk factors unique to combat conditions. Firearm injuries have a special place in the pathogenesis of combat-related ischemic stroke. We have proposed and substantiated the term vasculocerebral injury. It is a distinct type of combat firearm injury, representing a cascade of sequential interrelated pathological changes occurring in the damaged major precerebral arteries (aorta, brachiocephalic trunk, common and internal carotid arteries, vertebral arteries), cerebral arteries, their vascular territories, blood cellular elements, and surrounding tissues as a result of the complex damaging effect of a high-energy projectile (shock wave, lateral impact energy, vortex flow), ultimately leading to pathophysiologically heterogeneous secondary acute cerebrovascular lesions, including ischemic stroke. Clinical cases of vasculocerebral injury are presented. Early identification of cervical and cranial vascular injuries contributes to timely and optimal treatment tactic selection (surgical, conservative, including differentiated antithrombotic therapy) and improves ischemic stroke prevention during combat operations.

About the authors

Igor V. Litvinenko

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8988-3011
SPIN-code: 6112-2792

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Nikolay V. Tsygan

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5881-2242
SPIN-code: 1006-2845

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey V. Kolomentsev

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3756-6214
SPIN-code: 6439-6701

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey Yu. Golokhvastov

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5316-4832
SPIN-code: 2515-2435

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Ruslan V. Andreev

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4845-5368

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Miroslav M. Odinak

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7314-7711
SPIN-code: 1155-9732

Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Dmitriy V.  Svistov

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3922-9887
SPIN-code: 3184-5590

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Aleksandr V. Savello

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1680-6119
SPIN-code: 3185-9332

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Kirill V. Kitachev

Military Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3244-9561

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vasiliy O. Nikishin

Military Medical Academy

Email: izvestiavmeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-1239-9796
SPIN-code: 9295-5923

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Ma Z, He W, Zhou Y, et al. Global burden of stroke in adolescents and young adults (aged 15–39 years) from 1990 to 2019: a comprehensive trend analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2042. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18415-5
  2. Satapathy P, Chauhan S, Gaidhane S, et al. Burden of stroke in adolescents and young adults (aged 15–39 years) in South East Asia: a trend analysis from 1990 to 2021 based on the global burden of disease study 2021. Front Stroke. 2025;4:1503574. doi: 10.3389/fstro.2025.1503574
  3. Nikishin VO, Golokhvastov SYu, Litvinenko IV, et al. Ischemic stroke in young adults: risk factors and etiopathogenetic features. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2020;(S3):68–71. doi: 10.32863/1682-7392-2020-3-71-68-71 EDN: ADIOQL
  4. Golokhvastov SYu, Yanishevsky SN, Tsygan NV, et al. Risk factors and features of ischemic stroke in young adults. Russian Military Medical Academy Reports. 2021;40(S4):27–31. EDN: HATTMN
  5. Terada H, Nakamura K, Fujita S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for ischemic stroke in patients with cancer: a retrospective observational study. Thromb Res. 2025;240:109455. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109455
  6. Kawano T, Mackman N. Cancer patients and ischemic stroke. Thromb Res. 2024;237:155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.02.013
  7. Bürger M, Kapahnke S, Rusch M, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Trauma 2025 — what’s new and interesting? Gefässchirurgie. 2025;30(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00772-025-01589-7
  8. Plotkin A, Weaver FA, Owattanapanich N, et al. Epidemiology, repair technique, and predictors of stroke and mortality in penetrating carotid artery injuries. J Vasc Surg. 2023;78(4):920–928. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.019
  9. White PW, Walker PF, Bozzay JD, et al. Management and outcomes of wartime cervical carotid artery injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89 (2 Suppl 2):S225–S230. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002755
  10. Zavrazhnov AA, Samokhvalov IM, Eroshenko AV. Surgical strategy for wound to the neck under conditions of medical institutions in peace time. Vestnik Khirurgii. 2006;165(5):50–55. EDN: KVKWAV
  11. Katoch R, Gambhir R. Warfare vascular injuries. Med J Armed Forces India. 2010;66(4):338–341. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(10)80013-9
  12. Burlew CC, Biffl WL, Moore EE, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: redefining screening criteria in the era of noninvasive diagnosis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(2):330–337. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182426d58
  13. LeBlang SD. Noninvasive imaging of cervical vascular injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(5):1269–1276. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.5.1741269
  14. Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging; Schroeder JW, Ptak T, Corey AS, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Penetrating Neck Injury. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(11 Suppl):S500–S505. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.048
  15. Saito N, Hito R, Burke PA, Sakai O. Imaging of penetrating injuries of the head and neck: current practice at a level I trauma center in the United States. Keio J Med. 2014;63(2):23–33. doi: 10.2302/kjm.2013-0003-CR
  16. Ramadan F, Rutledge R, Oller D, et al. Carotid artery trauma: a review of contemporary trauma center experiences. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:46–55. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70250-9
  17. Trunin EM, Mikhaylov AP, Danilov AM, et al. Treatment of main neck vessel injuries. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 11. Medicine. 2007;(4):82–88. EDN: RTSHTJ
  18. Chadi T, Anthony D. Fatal vertebral artery injury in penetrating cervical spine trauma. Case Rep Neurol Med. 2015;2015:5. doi: 10.1155/2015/909376
  19. Goyal K, Sunny JT, Gillespie CS, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertebral artery injury after cervical spine trauma. Global Spine J. 2023;14(4):1356–1368. doi: 10.1177/21925682231209631
  20. Wathen C, Santangelo G, Muhammad N, et al. Management and outcomes of cerebrovascular injuries after gunshot wounds to the cervical spine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024;233:108376. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108376
  21. Mingo M, Cao D, Ezepue C, et al. Embolic shotgun pellet to the left middle cerebral artery causing hemiplegia and aphasia with near complete clinical recovery on nonoperative management. Cureus. 2020;12(11):e11677. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11677
  22. Gomez D, Rajeeth G, Pirakash P, Attanayake D. Air rifle wound to the chest and pellet embolism to the intracranial internal carotid artery with a middle cerebral artery territory infarct: a case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023;113:109076. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109076
  23. Ongom PA, Kijjambu SC, Jombwe J. Atypical gunshot injury to the right side of the face with the bullet lodged in the carotid sheath: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-29
  24. Maksimov DA, Boyarintsev VV, Stazhadze LL, et al. Heart injury mechanisms in blunt chest trauma. pathophysiological features, clinical manifestations and treatment strategy. Kremlin Medicine Journal. 2019;3:98–108. EDN: CVOMHQ
  25. Savvin Yu, Kudryavtsev BP, Krasnov SA, Poyarkov AM. Clinical Guidelines for Medical Care of Chest Injury Victims in Emergency Situations. In: Clinical guidelines for polytrauma. Moscow: Federal State Budgetary Institution “All-Russian Center for Disaster Medicine “Zashchita” of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency; 2016. P. 31–49. (In Russ.) EDN: YKHHDD
  26. Reddy D, David JJ, Muckart DJJ. Holes in the heart: an atlas of intracardiac injuries following penetrating trauma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19(1):56–63. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu077
  27. Jendoubi A, Bourguiba B, Gaja A, Houissa M. Stroke complicating penetrating heart injury: keys to the diagnostic workup and management. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(2):239–241. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.203030
  28. Dunne B, Tan D, Ihdayhid A, et al. Penetrating cardiac injury managed without surgery but with systemic heparinisation. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24:e210–e213. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.003
  29. De Bruin G, Pereira da Silva R. Stroke complicating traumatic ventricular septal defect. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(6):987–988. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.10.031
  30. Babichev KN, Savello AV, Sadkovskaya EK, et al. Traumatic intracranial aneurysms following combat cranial injuries. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2023;87(6):25–32. doi: 10.17116/neiro20238706125 EDN: BPGXYG
  31. Geddes AE, Burlew CC, Wagenaar AE, et al. Expanded screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: a bigger impact than anticipated. Am J Surg. 2016;212(6):1167–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.016
  32. Ciapetti M, Circelli A, Zagli G, et al. Diagnosis of carotid arterial injury in major trauma using a modification of Memphis criteria. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-61
  33. Nagpal P, Policeni BA, Bathla G, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: advances in screening, imaging, and management trends. Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(3):406–414. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5486
  34. Malhotra A, Wu X, Seifert K. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: advances in screening, imaging, and management trends. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(9):E103. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5733
  35. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, et al. Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1999;47(5):845–853. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199911000-00003
  36. Liang T, Tso DK, Chiu RY, Nicolaou S. Imaging of blunt vascular neck injuries: a clinical perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(4):893–901. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9625
  37. O’Banion LA, Dirks RC, Siada SS, et al. Risk factors for stroke in penetrating carotid trauma: an analysis from the PROOVIT Registry. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(5):717–722. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003512
  38. Reva VA, Pronchenko AA, Samokhvalov IM. Operative management of penetrating carotid artery injuries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(1):16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.025

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Additional risk factors for ischaemic stroke in combat conditions.

Download (322KB)
3. Fig. 2. Pathogenesis of vasculocerebral injury.

Download (208KB)
4. Fig. 3. Duplex scanning of the neck vessels. Foreign bodies (fragments — marks 1, 2) adjacent to the posterior wall of the right common carotid artery. Floating thrombus of the posterolateral wall of the middle third of the right common carotid artery (marks 3, 4). Non-stenotic atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries.

Download (119KB)
5. Fig. 4. At the 1st Clinic of Advanced Surgery of the Military Medical Academy, the patient underwent thrombectomy from the right common carotid artery: a — fragmentary penetrating wound of the posterior wall of the middle third of the right common carotid artery with the formation of a parietal thrombus; b — removed thrombus.

Download (351KB)
6. Fig. 5. Computed tomography of the head. Signs of cerebral infarction (extensive hypodense area) in the right middle cerebral artery basin. Median dislocation to the left (6 mm).

Download (92KB)
7. Fig. 6. Computed tomography of the neck. Postoperative (decompressive interlaminectomy) defect in the C4 vertebral arch and C5 vertebral arch on the left. Metal foreign body (3 × 4 mm) in the projection of the spinal cord. Two metallic foreign bodies in the paravertebral soft tissues at the level of the C5 vertebra.

Download (200KB)
8. Fig. 7. Duplex scanning of the head vessels. Stenosis of the left middle cerebral artery in segment M1, 52% in diameter.

Download (144KB)
9. Fig. 8. At the neurosurgery clinic of the Military Medical Academy, the patient underwent selective cerebral angiography. The results of the study revealed stenosis (most likely due to dissection) of the M1 segment of the left middle cerebral artery by more than 50% beyond the area of perforating artery origin. A traumatic aneurysm of the ascending deep neck artery measuring up to 4 mm in diameter was also detected.

Download (294KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».