Characteristics of early–stage fibrosis model in chronic alcoholic liver disease in rats

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The early stage of liver fibrosis of alcoholic or drug-induced origin in humans is difficult to diagnose because it is often asymptomatic. Developing experimental models of the early stages of liver fibrosis that closely reproduce clinical characteristics and allow for the evaluation of candidate hepatoprotective agents for the prevention and treatment of fibrosis is an important task in hepatology.

AIM: This work aimed to develop a model of the early stage of liver fibrosis with evaluation of typical pathomorphological and biochemical indicators of chronic alcoholic liver disease in rats.

METHODS: The study was conducted on 20 white outbred male rats weighing 270–315 g, which were divided into 2 groups: experimental and control (n = 10 per group). Alcohol-induced liver injury was modeled by intragastric administration of 40% ethanol at 5 g/kg for the first 14 days and 3.75 g/kg for the subsequent 14 days. Throughout the experiment, general condition, body weight, and mortality were monitored. At the end of ethanol administration, animals were euthanized; blood was collected for biochemical analysis, and liver tissue was collected to determine S-adenosylmethionine concentration and perform histological examination. The severity of fibrosis was assessed using the METAVIR score, and the liver mass coefficient was determined.

RESULTS: The induced alcoholic liver disease was characterized by mortality and neurological disturbances, including increased aggressiveness and slowed body weight gain compared with controls. Mortality in the experimental group (2 rats) occurred on day 13 after the start of ethanol administration. Biochemical analysis demonstrated increased aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase activity, as well as a decrease in the R-factor and reduced synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine in the liver. Liver dysfunction was accompanied by a reduction in the liver mass coefficient, nucleomegaly and steatosis, and moderate hepatofibrosis (stage F2 according to METAVIR), due to collagen fiber proliferation around bile ducts in portal tracts and the initiation of porto-portal septa formation.

CONCLUSION: The model successfully reproduced characteristic features of alcoholic liver disease and can be recommended for studying the pathogenesis and early stages of liver cirrhosis, as well as for the screening and evaluation of candidate hepatoprotective and antifibrotic agents.

About the authors

Konstantin V. Sivak

Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza

Author for correspondence.
Email: kvsivak@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4064-5033
SPIN-code: 7426-8322

Dr. Sci. (Biology)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Tatiana N. Savateeva-Lyibimova

Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza

Email: drugs_safety@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4516-3308
SPIN-code: 3543-6799

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Kira I. Stosman

Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza; Golikov Research Clinical Center of Toxicology under the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: labtox6@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7959-2376
SPIN-code: 8423-0170

Cand. Sci. (Biology)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Elena Y. Kalinina

Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza; Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: drkalinina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7077-3584
SPIN-code: 1176-5739

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Global status report on alcohol and health and treatment of substance use disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240096745
  2. Ivashkin VT, Mayevskaya MV, Pavlov ChS, et al. Management of adult patients with alcoholic liver disease: clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientific Liver Society. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2017;27(6):20–40. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2017-27-6-20-40 EDN: YQEEDK
  3. Tsukanov VV, Vasyutin AV, Tonkikh YuL. The burden of hepatic cirrhosis in the modern world. Doctor.Ru. 2021;20(4):21–25. doi: 10.31550/1727-2378-2021-20-4-21-25 EDN: KDAEGU
  4. Stepanenko DA, Goma TV, Kozlova NM. Alcoholic liver disease: etiology and the impact of risk factors (literature review). Baikal Medical Journal. 2023;2(2):20–29. doi: 10.57256/2949-0715-2023-2-2-20-29 EDN: DXBONB
  5. Osna NA, Donohue TM Jr, Kharbanda KK. Alcoholic liver disease: pathogenesis and current management. Alcohol Res. 2017;38(2):147–161. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v38.2.01
  6. Patel R, Mueller M. Alcohol-аssociated liver disease. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546632
  7. Ryu T, Kim K, Choi SE, et al. New insights in the pathogenesis of alcohol-related liver disease: The metabolic, immunologic, and neurologic pathways. Liver Res. 2023;7(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2022.09.004 EDN: BZZCFA
  8. Kiseleva YV, Zharikov YO, Maslennikov RV, et al. Molecular factors associated with regression of liver fibrosis of alcoholic etiology. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2021;93(2):204–208. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2021.02.200617 EDN: AFLKLJ
  9. Wu S, Wang X, Xing W, et al. An update on animal models of liver fibrosis. Front Med. 2023;10:1160053. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1160053 EDN: NNNNEV
  10. Kosolapov VA, Litvinov RA, Spasov AA. Experimental models of fibrosis. Journal of Volgograd State Medical University. 2024;21(3):39–47. doi: 10.19163/1994-9480-2024-21-3-39-47 EDN: GOJOZZ
  11. Morgan TR. Treatment of alcoholic liver disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017;13(7):425–427.
  12. Ivashkin VT, Baranovsky AYu, Raikhelson KL, et al. Drug-induced liver injuries (Clinical guidelines for physicians). Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2019;29(1):101–131. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2019-29-1-101-131 EDN: ZERHTF
  13. Hall P, Cash J. What is the real function of the liver ‘function’ tests? Ulster Med J. 2012;81(1):30–36.
  14. Tabatabai L, Lewis WD, Gordon F, et al. Fibrosis/cirrhosis after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hum Pathol. 1999;30(1):39–47. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(99)90298-8
  15. Ginès P, Graupera I, Lammert F, et al. Screening for liver fibrosis in the general population: a call for action. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(3):256–260. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30081-4 EDN: XUHGRV
  16. Carbonell G, Berná-Serna JD, Oltra L, et al. Evaluation of rat liver with ARFI elastography: in vivo and ex vivo study. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217297
  17. Guschin YaA. Application of morphometry methods to assess histopathology in preclinical studies. Laboratory Animals for Science. 2024;1:32–41. doi: 10.57034/2618723X-2024-01-04 EDN: MZMDWJ
  18. Chrostek L, Panasiuk A. Liver fibrosis markers in alcoholic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(25):8018–8023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8018

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).