Vertical riverbed deformations due to in-stream mining

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Comparison of the longitudinal profile of a number of lowland rivers in Russia, revealed their deformation due to a half-century of sediment flux and channel morphology adjustment. This problem remains relevant both in theoretical and practical aspects, especially for rivers where long-term mining of sediments from the stream beds extends from kilometers to tens of kilometers. The removal of a large amount of alluvial material from the sediments transport and changes of the riverbed morphometric characteristics triggered the process of leveling the sediment transport capacity along the river by the scour and resulted in a lowering of the bottom and water surface. The intensity of the incision reached 3–8 centimeters, and its progradation along the river 400–700 meters per year. Retrogressive erosion is pronounced, while progressive one is less pronounced, because partially replaced by mechanical removal of alluvial material. Over the past decades the shape of the longitudinal profiles changed from convex or straight to concave with no signs of recovery, despite the mining has been quite moderate for last 30 years or completed on the explored rivers.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

K. M. Berkovich

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography

Author for correspondence.
Email: berkovitch@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

L. V. Zlotina

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography

Email: zleonora@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

L. A. Turykin

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography

Email: filigorod@list.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Bovolin V., Ponce V.M. (2008). Evolution of sand mining pits in alluvial rivers. Final draft 28.08.08. http://kon.sdsu.edu/~bovolin/borrowpit/evolution.html
  2. Dobycha nerudnykh stroitelnykh materialov v vodnykh ob’ektakh. Uchet ruslovogo protsessa i rekomendatsii po proektirovaniyu i ekspluatatsii ruslovykh kar’erov (Non-metallic building materials mining in water objects. Riverbed process accounting and recommendation on instream mines design and operation). (2012). Sankt Peterburg: Globus (Publ.). 140 p. (in Russ)
  3. Dong Chen (2011). Modeling Channel Response to Instream Gravel Mining. In Sediment Transport — Flow Processes and Morphology. In: Tech publ. Rijeka, Croatia. P. 125–140. http//dx.doi.org/10.5772/21348
  4. Galay V.J. (1983). Causes of River Bed Degradation. Water resources research. V. 19. № 5. P. 1057–1090.
  5. Karasev I.F. (1975). Ruslovye protsessy pri perebroske stoka (Riverbed processes by stream flow diversion). Leningrad: Hydrometeo (Publ.). 288 с. (in Russ)
  6. Kondolf G.M. (1994). Geomorphic and environmental effects of instream gravel mining. Landscape Urban Planning. V. 28. Iss. 2–3. P. 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90010-8
  7. Makkaveev N.I. (1955). Ruslo reki i erosiya v ee basseine (River channel and erosion within its basin). Moscow: AN SSSR (Publ.). Р. 346. (in Russ)
  8. Naumov G.G. (2012). Antropogennye vozdeistviya na ruslovye protsessy na perekhodakh cherez reki (Human induced impact to riverbed processes on the stream crossings). Moscow: MADI (Publ.). 105 p. (in Russ)
  9. Rinaldi M., Wyżga B., Surian N. (2005). Sediment mining in alluvial channels: physical effects and management perspectives. River Res. Applic. V. 21. № 7. Р. 805–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.884
  10. Savichev O.G. (2007). Bed sediment flux of Tom’ River (West Siberia). Tomsk Polytechnics University Bulletin. V. 310. № 3. P. 22–25. (in Russ.)
  11. Simon A., Rinaldi M. (2006). Disturbance, stream incision, and channel evolution: The roles of excess transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response. Geomorphology. № 79. P. 361–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.037
  12. Vershinin D.A. (2005). Tekhnogennye vozdeistviya na vertikal’nye deformatsii rusla i gidravliku potoka (na primere r. Tomi) (Technogenic impact on channel vertical deformation and flow hydraulic (case study of Tom River)). PhD thesis. Tomsk: Tomsk State University (Publ.). 22 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Oka River water surface longitudinal profile between Serpukhov and Kolomna Cities.

Download (45KB)
3. Fig. 2. Retrogressive deformations intensity changes along the river from the point of maximum profile deflection: 1 — Oka River between Serpukhov and Kashira Cities; 2 — Oka River upstream of Aleksin City; 3 – Tom’ River upstream of Tomsk City; 4 — Katun’ River upstream of Lesnoye settlement.

Download (46KB)
4. Fig. 3. Tom’ River channel deformation intensity: 1 — downstream of Tomsk City, 2 — upstream of Tomsk City.

Download (49KB)
5. Fig. 4. Progressive deformation intensity change along Belaya River downstream of Ufa City in 1965–1999.

Download (45KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies