COMPUTER SIMULATION OF BIPHASIC CATALYTIC PROCESS IN PRESENCE OF POLYMER MICROGELS

R. A. Gumerov; Гумеров Р. А.; M. V. Anakhov; Анахов М. В.; I. I. Potemkin; Потемкин И. И.

doi:10.31857/S268695352360006X

COMPUTER SIMULATION OF BIPHASIC CATALYTIC PROCESS IN PRESENCE OF POLYMER MICROGELS

作者: Gumerov R.¹, Anakhov M.¹, Potemkin I.¹
隶属关系:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Physics Department
期: 卷 512, 编号 1 (2023)
页面: 130-136
栏目: ФИЗИЧЕСКАЯ ХИМИЯ
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-9535/article/view/247192
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S268695352360006X
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZIEVFY
ID: 247192

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

Dissipative particle dynamics were used for the first time to simulate the reaction of biphasic catalysis with microgels adsorbed at the phase boundary with catalytic groups. It is shown that the rate of the catalytic process increases with the degree of deformation of the polymer network, which depends on the amount of the crosslinker and the solubility of the polymer in both phases. In this case, the highest rate of catalysis was observed for the microgel soluble in both phases due to an increase in its porosity (compared to amphiphilic microgels) and the “water–microgel–oil” contact area with a simultaneous decrease in the time for reagents to reach the catalytic groups due to the flattening of the microgel. The results obtained can be useful for increasing the efficiency of a wide range of catalytic reactions of the considered type through the use of network macromolecules.

关键词

biphasic catalysis, microgels, dissipative particle dynamics

参考

Karg M., Pich A., Hellweg T., Hoare T., Lyon L.A., Crassous J.J., Suzuki D., Gumerov R.A., Schneider S., Potemkin I.I., Richtering W. // Langmuir. 2019. V. 35. P. 6231–6255. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04304
Anakhov M.V., Gumerov R.A., Potemkin I.I. // Mendeleev Commun. 2020. V. 30. P. 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2020.09.002
Lyon L.A., Fernandez-Nieves A. // Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012. V. 63. P. 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143735
Richtering W. // Langmuir. 2012. V. 28 P. 17218–17229. https://doi.org/10.1021/la302331s
Zlotin S.G., Kucherenko A.S., Beletskaya I.P. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2009. V. 78. P. 737–784. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2009v078n08ABEH004040
Beletskaya I.P., Kashin A.N., Litvinov A.E., Tyurin V.S., Valetsky P.M., van Koten G. // Organometallics. 2006. V. 25. P. 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1021/om050562x
Beletskaya I.P., Khokhlov A.R., Tarasenko E.A., Tyu-rin V.S. // J. Organomet. Chem. 2007. V. 692. P. 4402–4406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.06.056
Beletskaya I.P., Kashin A.N., Khotina I.A., Khokh-lov A.R. // Synlett. 2008. P. 1547–1552. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1078430
Beletskaya I.P., Selivanova A.V., Tyurin V.S., Matve-ev V.V., Khokhlov A.R. // Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2010. V. 46. P. 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070428010020016
Xiong L., Zhang H., Zhong A., He Z., Huang K. // Chem. Commun. 2014. V. 50. P. 14778–14781. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc06573e
Ahmed E., Cho J., Friedmann L., Jang S.S., Weck M. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022. V. 2. P. 2316–2326. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00367
Hajji C., Haag R. Hyperbranched Polymers as Platforms for Catalysts. In: Dendrimer Catalysis. Gade L.H. (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. V. 20. 2006. pp. 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/3418_035
Wiese S., Spiess A.C., Richtering W. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013. V. 52. P. 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201206931
Ajmal M., Demirci S., Siddiq M., Aktas N., Sahiner N. // New J. Chem. 2016. V. 40. P. 1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ02298C
Borrmann R., Palchyk V., Pich A., Rueping M. // ACS Catal. 2018. V. 8. P. 7991–7996. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b01408
Tan K.H., Xu W., Stefka S., Demco D.E., Kharandiuk T., Ivasiv V., Nebesnyi R., Petrovskii V.S., Potemkin I.I., Pich A. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019. V. 58. P. 9791–9796. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201901161
Kleinschmidt D., Fernandes M.S., Mork M., Meyer A.A., Krischel J., Anakhov M.V., Gumerov R.A., Potemkin I.I., Rueping M., Pich A. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020. V. 559. P. 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.005
Kleinschmidt D., Nothdurft K., Anakhov M.V., Meyer A.A., Mork M., Gumerov R.A., Potemkin I.I., Richtering W., Pich A. // Mater. Adv. 2020. V. 1. P. 2983–2993. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00407c
Sabadasch V., Dirksen M., Fandrich P., Cremer J., Biere N., Anselmetti D., Hellweg T. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022. V. 14. P. 49181–49188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c14415
Gumerov R.A., Rumyantsev A.M., Rudov A.A., Pich A., Richtering W., Möller M., Potemkin I.I. // ACS Macro Lett. 2016. V. 5. P. 612–616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00149
Gumerov R.A., Filippov S.A., Richtering W., Pich A., Potemkin I.I. // Soft Matter. 2019. V. 15. P. 3978–3986. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM00389D
Hoogerbrugge P.J., Koelman J.M.V.A. // Europhys. Lett. 1992. V. 19. P. 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001
Español P., Warren P. // Europhys. Lett. 1995. V. 30. P. 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/30/4/001
Groot R.D., Warren P.B. // J. Chem. Phys. 1997. V. 107. P. 4423–4435. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474784
Gama Goicochea A., Romero-Bastida M., López-Ren-dón R. // Mol. Phys. 2007. V. 105. P. 2375–2381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970701624679
Thompson A.P., Aktulga H.M., Berger R., Bolintine-anu D.S., Brown W.M., Crozier P.S., in ’t Veld P.J., Kohlmeyer A., Moore S.G., Nguyen T.D., Shan R., Stevens M.J., Tranchida J., Trott C., Plimpton S.J. // Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022. V. 271. P. 108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171
Komarova G.A., Kozhunova E.Yu., Potemkin I.I. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. P. 8549. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238549
Voevodin V.V., Antonov A.S., Nikitenko D.A., Shvets P.A., Sobolev S.I., Sidorov I.Yu., Stefanov K.S., Voevodin V.V., Zhumatiy S.A. // Supercomput. Front. Innov. 2019. V. 6. P. 4–11. https://doi.org/10.14529/jsfi190201