Consequences of weakening of dynamic barrier of the Arctic polar vortex

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The dynamic barrier is one of the physical characteristics of the polar vortices; it prevents subpolar air masses from penetrating into the vortex and contributes to a temperature decrease inside the vortex in the lower stratosphere. In the presence of a dynamic barrier in winter, chlorine compounds involved in the ozone destruction cycle accumulate on particles of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) and heterogeneous reactions occur with the formation of molecular chlorine, and with the appearance of solar radiation over the polar region, photochemical reactions begin, leading to large-scale ozone depletion. When the dynamic barrier is weakened in winter, the temperature inside the vortex rises, PSC melts and, thus, the accumulation of chlorine cycle reagents on PSC is interrupted. We proposed dividing the Arctic polar vortex dynamics into 3 types according to the consequences: (1) the strong vortex, whose activity results in ozone depletion, (2) the weak vortex with breakdown in winter, marked by a sudden stratospheric warming, and (3) the stable vortex with an episode (episodes) weakening of the dynamic barrier in winter without ozone depletion in the period from late winter to spring. We have for the first time proposed a characteristic of the dynamic barrier of the polar vortex at all pressure levels from 100 to 1 hPa and described the consequences of its weakening. Using the vortex delineation method based on the data of the ERA5 and MERRA-2 reanalyses, we showed that in all cases when the polar ozone depletion was not recorded from late winter to spring under the conditions of the stable polar vortex, the dynamic barrier weakening and PSС melting was observed in midwinter.

作者简介

V. Zuev

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vzuev@list.ru

Corresponding member of the RAS

俄罗斯联邦, Tomsk

E. Savel’eva

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vzuev@list.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Tomsk; Moscow

E. Maslennikova

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vzuev@list.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Tomsk; Moscow

A. Tomashova

Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vzuev@list.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Tomsk

V. Krupchatnikov

A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vzuev@list.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

O. Chkhetiani

A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vzuev@list.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

M. Kalashnik

A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vzuev@list.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Waugh D. W., Sobel A. H., Polvani L. M. What is the polar vortex and how does it influence weather? // Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 2017. V. 98. № 1. P. 37–44.
  2. Manney G. L., Zurek R. W., O’Neill A., Swinbank R. On the motion of air through the stratospheric polar vortex // J. Atmos. Sci. 1994. V. 51. № 20. P. 2973–2994.
  3. Zuev V. V., Savelieva E. Arctic polar vortex dynamics during winter 2006/2007 // Polar Sci. 2020. V. 25. P. 100532.
  4. Solomon S. Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concepts and history // Rev. Geophys. 1999. V. 37. № 3. P. 275–316.
  5. Finlayson-Pitts B.J., Pitts J. N. Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications. California: Academic Press, 2000. 969 p.
  6. Hersbach H., Bell B., Berrisford P., et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis // Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 2020. V. 146. № 729. P. 1–51.
  7. Gelaro R., McCarty W., Suárez M. J., et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) // J. Climate. 2017. V. 30. № 14. P. 5419–5454.
  8. Zuev V. V., Savelieva E. Stratospheric polar vortex dynamics according to the vortex delineation method // J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2023. V. 132. № 1. P. 39.
  9. Limpasuvan V., Thompson D. W.J., Hartmann D. L. The life cycle of the Northern Hemisphere sudden stratospheric warmings // J. Climate. 2004. V. 17. № 13. P. 2584–2596.
  10. Hoppel K., Bevilacqua R., Nedoluha G., et al. POAM III observations of Arctic ozone loss for the 1999/2000 winter // J. Geophys. Res. 2002. V. 107. № 20. P. 8262.
  11. Kuttippurath J., Nikulin G. A comparative study of the major sudden stratospheric warmings in the Arctic winters 2003/2004–2009/2010 // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012. V. 12. № 17. P. 8115–8129.
  12. Zuev V. V., Savelieva E. Antarctic polar vortex dynamics depending on wind speed along the vortex edge // Pure Appl. Geophys. 2022. V. 179. № 6–7. P. 2609–2616.
  13. Holton J. An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 4th Edition. California: Academic Press, 2004. 535 p.

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

##common.cookie##