Barack Obama’s diplomacy and the syrian peace process

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article is devoted to the diplomatic activity of the first and second administrations of Barack Obama to resolve the Syrian civil war. Changes in the attitude of the United States towards the government of Bashar al-Assad, as well as forced attempts to change power in the country according to the Libyan model, both through the UN Security Council and through the Friends of Syria Group, are considered. The study analyzes the participation of the United States in the Geneva peace process on Syria, their role in this process, as well as the importance attached to the peace talks by the White House. In addition, attention is paid to the Russian-American ceasefire agreements reached in 2016. Conclusions are drawn about the degree of responsibility of Barack Obama's diplomacy for the actual collapse of the Geneva peace process.

作者简介

Alexey Yurk

St. Petersburg State University

Email: alexey.yurk@mail.ru
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Видясова М.Ф. 2012. Тунис - зачинатель "арабских революций". Актуальные проблемы Европы, №3, с. 42-91.
  2. Самуйлов С.М., Панюжева М.М. 2016. Борьба США с ИГИЛ и ответ России. США v Канада: экономика, политика, культура, №1, с. 3-21.
  3. Ходынская-Голенищева М.С. 2013. Подготовка "Женевы-2" в свете актуальных аспектов развития сирийского кризиса. Вестник МГИМО-Университета, № 5 (32), с. 33-38. doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-33-38
  4. Ходынская-Голенищева М.С. 2017. Работа Совета Безопасности ООН по сирийскому кризису в условиях трансформации системы международных отношений. Вестник МГИМО-Университета, № 6 (57), с. 161-173. doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2017-6-57-161-173
  5. Ходынская-Голенищева М.С. 2017. Формирование Женевского переговорного процесса по урегулированию конфликта в Сирии ("Женева-1"). Вестник Брянского государственного университета, № 4 (34), с. 149-154.
  6. Шумилин А.И. 2013. США - Египет: в поисках новой модели партнёрства. США v Канада: экономика, политика, культура, № 1 (517), с. 37-54.
  7. Davidson J.W. 2013. France, Britain and the intervention in Libya: an integrated analysis. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 310-329, doi: 10.1080/09557571.2013.784573
  8. Lantis J.S. 2020. Advocacy Coalitions and Foreign Policy Change: Understanding US Responses to the Syrian Civil War. Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1. doi: 10.1093/jogss/ogaa016
  9. Mueller J, Stewart M.G. 2016. Misoverestimating ISIS: Comparisons with Al-Qaeda. Perspectives on Terrorism, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 30-39.
  10. Springborg R. 2012. The US Response to the Arab Uprising: Leadership Missing. In R. Alcaro & M. Haubrich-Seco (Eds.), Re-thinking Western Policies in Light of the Arab Uprising (pp. 31-54). Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).
  11. Talmon S. 2013. Recognition of Opposition Groups as the Legitimate Representative of a People. Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 219-253. doi: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmt014

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

##common.cookie##