Multilateralism and minilateralism as global governance mechanisms
- Authors: Polulyakh D.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Issue: No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 63-84
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-6730/article/view/144793
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673023030057
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HBCBTW
- ID: 144793
Cite item
Abstract
Multilateralism and minilateralism are the main mechanisms of global governance. Multilateralism is characterized by membership inclusiveness, a low entry threshold for new members, and a focus on universality, while minilateralism is characterized by membership exclusivity, a high entry threshold for new members, and no focus on universality. Contemporary multilateral institutions emerged after World War II under the influence of American hegemony. The US commitment to multilateralism in global governance has been inconsistent, setting the stage for the current crisis of multilateral global governance. The aforementioned crisis can be explained by the problems of American leadership, the emergence of a polycentric power configuration of the world, as well as specific actions of both the hegemon and other great powers. The issue was fueled by the increasingly evident problems of ineffectiveness of the core global institutions in dealing with pressing problems, deadlocks in multilateral negotiations and the lack of representation of developing countries in global governance. The failure of the main actors to respond to these challenges has led to the proliferation of the minilateralist mechanism of global governance. Two types of minilateralism in global governance are distinguished - clubs of the most significant states (the first type) and communities of like-minded states (the second type). The main advantage of the first type of minilateralism is the ability to solve global problems with minimal effort. Minilateralism of the second type is positively distinguished by its homogeneous structure and cohesion of the ranks. The main advantages of minilateralism in general include flexibility, adaptability, plasticity, quick decision-making, free, open and effective negotiations and resource saving. The main disadvantages of minilateralism are low legitimacy, limited technical and financial capabilities, lack of transparency and accountability, vagueness of goals and lack of focus. The first type of minilateralism is able to somewhat increase the effectiveness of interaction within the global institutions by reducing the number of parties involved, but it is unlikely to be able to overcome the core source of ineffectiveness of global governance, which is the mistrust between the main actors. The main disadvantage of the second type of minilateralism is the fragmentation of international regimes. The emergence of the minilateral competitors can both motivate the established institutions to reform and demotivate states to participate in multilateral global governance. Minilateralism will continue to play a large role in global governance. The disadvantages of minilateralism can be mitigated by combining it with the multilateralist mechanism, using a more rigorous approach to the selection of participants, goal setting and the implementation of agreements, and introducing a system of indirect representation.
Keywords
About the authors
Daniil Sergeevich Polulyakh
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: daniilpolulyakh@mail.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Мафуанг С. Влияние пандемии COVID-19 на перестройку глобализации и многосторонность. Русская политология - Russian Political Science, 2021, №2 (19), с. 109-115.
- Надточей Ю. Феномен односторонности в политике США и России. Международные процессы, 2004, № 3, с. 85-95.
- Полулях Д.С. Турбулентность как характеристика современного миропорядка. Политическая наука, 2017, №S,. 245-260.
- Полулях Д.C. Эволюция стратегий глобального управления. Политическая наука, 2012, № 4, с. 214-239.
- Сагалова А.Л. Международные организации во внешней политике России: опыт "опоздавшей" великой державы. Управленческое консультирование, 2013, № 9, с. 55-61.
- Стрежнева М.В. Приверженность Евросоюза принципу многосторонности в условиях трансформации мирового порядка. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25: Международные отношения и мировая политика, 2016, № 2, с. 3-30.
- Шаклеина Т.А. Критическое направление исследований миропорядка в США. Международные процессы, 2007, № 3, с. 66-75.
- Шаклеина Т.А. Лидерство и современный мировой порядок. Международные процессы, 2015, № 4, с. 6-19.
- Abbott, K.W., Faude, B. Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance. The Review of International Organizations, 2022, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 263-291. doi: 10.1007/s11558-021-09431-3
- Caporaso, J.International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form.Ruggie J.G. (ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, 1993, pp. 403-437
- Eckersley, R. Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 2012, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 24-42. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00107
- Falkner, R. A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits, and International Legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 2016, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 87-101. doi: 10.1017/S1537592715003242
- Hampson, F.O., Heinbecker, P. The "New" Multilateralism of the Twenty-First Century. Global Governance, 2011, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 299-310. doi: 10.1163/19426720-01703003
- Kahler, M. Global Governance: Three Futures.International Studies Review, 2018, vol. 20, issue 2, pp. 239-246. doi: 10.1093/isr/viy035
- Kahler, M. Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers.International Organization, 1992, vol, no. 3, pp. 681-708. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027867
- Keohane, R. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984. 320 p.
- Keohane, R. Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research.International Journal, 1990, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 731-764. doi: 10.1177/002070209004500401
- Kumar, A., Messner, D.Introduction: Global Governance: Issues, Trends and Challenges. Power Shifts and Global Governance: Challenges from South and North. Kumar A., Messner D. (eds.). London: Anthem Press, 2011, pp. 3-31.
- Milner, H.International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics, 1992, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 466-496. doi: 10.2307/2010546
- Naim, M. Minilateralism. Foreign Policy, no. 173, 2009, pp. 135-136. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/06/21/minilateralism/(accessed 10.11.2022).
- Paris, R. Global Governance and Power Politics: Back to Basics. Ethics & International Affairs, 2015, vol. 29, issue 4, pp. 407-418. doi: 10.1017/S0892679415000428
- Patrick, S. The New "New Multilateralism": Minilateral Cooperation, but at What Cost? Global Summitry, 2015, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 115-134. doi: 10.1093/global/guv008
- Patrick, S. The Unruled World: The Case for Good Enough Global Governance. Foreign Affairs, 2014, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 58-73
- Plesch, D., Weiss T.G. 1945's Lesson: "Good Enough" Global Governance Ain't Good Enough. Global Governance, 2015, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 197-204. doi: 10.1163/19426720-02102002
- Pouliot, V. Multilateralism as an End in Itself.International Studies Perspectives, 2011, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 18-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00416.x
- Ruggie, J.G. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution.International Organization, 1992, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 561-598. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027831
- Stephen, M.D. Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance. Global Governance, 2017, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 483-502. doi: 10.1163/19426720-02303009
- Tow, W.T. Minilateral security's relevance to US strategy in the Indo-Pacific: challenges and prospects. The Pacific Review, 2019, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 232-244. doi: 10.1080/09512748.2018.1465457
- Vabulas, F. Informal IGOs as Mediators of Power Shifts. Global Policy, 2020, vol. 11, issue S3, pp. 40-50. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12869
- Viola, L. Orchestration by design: The G20 in international financial regulation.International Organizations as Orchestrators /Abbott K., Genschel P., Snidal D., Zangl B., eds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 88-113. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139979696.006
- Zürn, M. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018. 336 pp.