Discretion Versus Modern Technologies and the Resourcefulness of Entrepreneurs (Using Tax Legal Relations as an Example)
- Авторлар: Kobzar-Frolova M.N.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Шығарылым: Том 22, № 4 (2025)
- Беттер: 555-571
- Бөлім: ОБЩИЕ ВОПРОСЫ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОГО УСМОТРЕНИЯ
- ##submission.datePublished##: 24.12.2025
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-7602/article/view/360907
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2025-22-4-555-571
- ID: 360907
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The article is devoted to the current and highly controversial issues of the actions of executive authorities at their discretion and judicial control over administrative discretion. The idea of the work: This article examines the features of discretion in the field of taxes and fees. The idea is brought to the fore that some theorists do not associate (deny) the presence of administrative discretion in financial relations. Legislation on taxes and fees began to actively develop only after perestroika, and was initially conflictual due to the law, which enshrines the existence of power relations and asserts the right to seize part of a person's property. Modern IT and Internet technologies not only provide taxpayers with ample opportunities and conditions for making a profit, but also create conditions under which the taxpayer does not have to pay taxes, and in some cases can count on a refund of the tax amount from the budget. The legislator does not have time to respond to innovations in technical progress. Tax authorities, daily faced with various financial schemes, often make decisions in the order of discretion. Objective: to convey the idea that the activity
of tax authorities is legal, it is based on the rules of law and is aimed at protecting the interests of the state (economic, social, etc.). Judicial control is recognized to ensure compliance with the law in the field of taxes and fees. Result: The article provides individual examples. The main part of the work develops the issue of judicial control over the administrative discretion of tax authorities. The corresponding conclusions
are made. In conclusion, it is concluded that discretion in tax legal relations, including in conflicts over tax disputes, must understood as a legal relationship.
Авторлар туралы
Margarita Kobzar-Frolova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: adminlaw@igpran.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2885-6401
Chief Researcher of the Administrative Law and Administrative Procedure Sector of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Ресей, 10 Znamenka str., Moscow, 119019, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Subjects of Administrative and Tort Relations. Philosophy of Law. 2023;4:80-86. (In Russ.)
- Solovey Yu. P. Standards of Judicial Evaluation of Discretionary Acts of Bodies (Officials) of Public Administration
- Under the Laws of the Russian Federation on Administrative Procedures. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State
- Law University (MSAL). 2015;8:99-113. (In Russ.)
- Solovey Yu. P. Discretionary Nature of Administrative Act as a Circumstance Precluding Judicial Review of
- Its Legality. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019;4:72-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-
- 2019.4.72.99 (In Russ.)
- Solovey Yu. P. Administrative Discretion (A Comparative Legal Study). In: Khachaturov R. L., Glukhareva
- L. I., Golovina A. A. etc. Formation and Development of Branches of Law in the Historical and Contemporary
- Legal Reality of Russia. Vol. VIII: Administrative Law in the System of Modern Russian Law. Moscow: Yurlitinform
- Publ.; 2022. P. 407–454. (In Russ.)
- Brosalina A. A. Administrative Discretion: the Concept and Implementation Limits in the Activities of Executive
- Authorities. Public Service. 2023;25(5):6-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2023-25-5-6-14
- (In Russ.)
- Zyryanov S. M. Discretion Limits in Law Enforcement Activities of Executive Bodies. Administrative Law
- and Procedure. 2018;7:72-77. (In Russ.)
- Manokhin V. M. The Rule of Law and the Problem of Discretionary Governance. Soviet State and Law.
- ;1:23-30. (In Russ.)
- Starilov Yu. N. Administrative Discretion: Not “One’s Own Opinion”, but a Legal Solution! Administrative
- Law and Procedure. 2024;12:3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2024-12-3-13 (In Russ.)
- Elistratov A. I. Fundamental Principles of Administrative Law. Moscow: Publ. by G. A. Leman; 1914. 337 p.
- (In Russ.)
- Starilov Yu. N. A Complicated Path of Understanding Legal Discretion: on the Sense of Confidence Based
- On Value Orientations. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2025;1:15-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-
- -1-15-25 (In Russ.)
- Gorbunova O. N. Best Works. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice Publ.; 2017. 542 p. (In Russ.)
- Krokhina Yu. A. Doctrine as a Factor in Optimising Financial Legislation. In: Financial-Legal Doctrine of
- the Post-Socialist State. Iss. 1. Chernovtsy, 2003. P. 40. (In Russ.)
- Zapol’skii S. V. The Theory of Financial Law: Scholarly Essays. Moscow: Russian Academy of Justice
- Publ.; 2010. 371 p. (In Russ.)
- Bryzgalin A. V. 2022 Accounting Policy of the Enterprise for Taxation Purposes. Tax and Financial Law.
- ;2:9-115. (In Russ.)
- Serkov P. P. Legal Relationship (Theory and Practice of Modern Legal Regulation). Part 1. Moscow: Norma
- Publ.; 2018. 512 p. (In Russ.)
- Grishkovets A. A. State Service and Civil Society: Legal Problems of Correlation (Practice of Russia). State
- and Law. 2004;1:24-36. (In Russ.)
Қосымша файлдар


