Discretion Versus Modern Technologies and the Resourcefulness of Entrepreneurs (Using Tax Legal Relations as an Example)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the current and highly controversial issues of the actions of executive authorities at their discretion and judicial control over administrative discretion. The idea of the work: This article examines the features of discretion in the field of taxes and fees. The idea is brought to the fore that some theorists do not associate (deny) the presence of administrative discretion in financial relations. Legislation on taxes and fees began to actively develop only after perestroika, and was initially conflictual due to the law, which enshrines the existence of power relations and asserts the right to seize part of a person's property. Modern IT and Internet technologies not only provide taxpayers with ample opportunities and conditions for making a profit, but also create conditions under which the taxpayer does not have to pay taxes, and in some cases can count on a refund of the tax amount from the budget. The legislator does not have time to respond to innovations in technical progress. Tax authorities, daily faced with various financial schemes, often make decisions in the order of discretion. Objective: to convey the idea that the activity
of tax authorities is legal, it is based on the rules of law and is aimed at protecting the interests of the state (economic, social, etc.). Judicial control is recognized to ensure compliance with the law in the field of taxes and fees. Result: The article provides individual examples. The main part of the work develops the issue of judicial control over the administrative discretion of tax authorities. The corresponding conclusions
are made. In conclusion, it is concluded that discretion in tax legal relations, including in conflicts over tax disputes, must understood as a legal relationship.

About the authors

Margarita N. Kobzar-Frolova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: adminlaw@igpran.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2885-6401

Chief Researcher of the Administrative Law and Administrative Procedure Sector of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, 10 Znamenka str., Moscow, 119019, Russian Federation

References

  1. Subjects of Administrative and Tort Relations. Philosophy of Law. 2023;4:80-86. (In Russ.)
  2. Solovey Yu. P. Standards of Judicial Evaluation of Discretionary Acts of Bodies (Officials) of Public Administration
  3. Under the Laws of the Russian Federation on Administrative Procedures. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State
  4. Law University (MSAL). 2015;8:99-113. (In Russ.)
  5. Solovey Yu. P. Discretionary Nature of Administrative Act as a Circumstance Precluding Judicial Review of
  6. Its Legality. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019;4:72-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-
  7. 2019.4.72.99 (In Russ.)
  8. Solovey Yu. P. Administrative Discretion (A Comparative Legal Study). In: Khachaturov R. L., Glukhareva
  9. L. I., Golovina A. A. etc. Formation and Development of Branches of Law in the Historical and Contemporary
  10. Legal Reality of Russia. Vol. VIII: Administrative Law in the System of Modern Russian Law. Moscow: Yurlitinform
  11. Publ.; 2022. P. 407–454. (In Russ.)
  12. Brosalina A. A. Administrative Discretion: the Concept and Implementation Limits in the Activities of Executive
  13. Authorities. Public Service. 2023;25(5):6-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2023-25-5-6-14
  14. (In Russ.)
  15. Zyryanov S. M. Discretion Limits in Law Enforcement Activities of Executive Bodies. Administrative Law
  16. and Procedure. 2018;7:72-77. (In Russ.)
  17. Manokhin V. M. The Rule of Law and the Problem of Discretionary Governance. Soviet State and Law.
  18. ;1:23-30. (In Russ.)
  19. Starilov Yu. N. Administrative Discretion: Not “One’s Own Opinion”, but a Legal Solution! Administrative
  20. Law and Procedure. 2024;12:3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2024-12-3-13 (In Russ.)
  21. Elistratov A. I. Fundamental Principles of Administrative Law. Moscow: Publ. by G. A. Leman; 1914. 337 p.
  22. (In Russ.)
  23. Starilov Yu. N. A Complicated Path of Understanding Legal Discretion: on the Sense of Confidence Based
  24. On Value Orientations. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2025;1:15-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-
  25. -1-15-25 (In Russ.)
  26. Gorbunova O. N. Best Works. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice Publ.; 2017. 542 p. (In Russ.)
  27. Krokhina Yu. A. Doctrine as a Factor in Optimising Financial Legislation. In: Financial-Legal Doctrine of
  28. the Post-Socialist State. Iss. 1. Chernovtsy, 2003. P. 40. (In Russ.)
  29. Zapol’skii S. V. The Theory of Financial Law: Scholarly Essays. Moscow: Russian Academy of Justice
  30. Publ.; 2010. 371 p. (In Russ.)
  31. Bryzgalin A. V. 2022 Accounting Policy of the Enterprise for Taxation Purposes. Tax and Financial Law.
  32. ;2:9-115. (In Russ.)
  33. Serkov P. P. Legal Relationship (Theory and Practice of Modern Legal Regulation). Part 1. Moscow: Norma
  34. Publ.; 2018. 512 p. (In Russ.)
  35. Grishkovets A. A. State Service and Civil Society: Legal Problems of Correlation (Practice of Russia). State
  36. and Law. 2004;1:24-36. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Kobzar-Frolova M.N.

License URL: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2658-7602 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7610 (Online)

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).